We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiSandbox and SentinelOne Singularity Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fortinet FortiSandbox is scalable."
"The solution is very good because it catches a lot of threats in emails."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiSandbox are customization, ICAP protocol, and integration with other vendors. Additionally, the security work very well."
"What I find most valuable, is that it is easy to use."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox puts suspicious files in quarantine, analyzes for virus risks, and lets them out of quarantine if it detects no risk."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiSandbox are the analysis options, artificial intelligence, and the many interfaces it provides."
"FortiSandbox helps us handle unknown threats. Every vendor is competing for who can detect an unknown threat the fastest. Fortinet is competitive in the market."
"It is a stable solution."
"They have different levels of support. We have the highest level where they are constantly checking all the endpoints. If at any certain point, they identify that a computer has been triggered by a virus, a link, or something else, they would automatically tell us that within 15 seconds. If they notice something, they automatically send us an email saying that they noticed something in the computer, and they are going to block it."
"The biggest value for us is getting a much better picture of what our risks are."
"The AI-based detection, scanning, prevention and mitigation features are the most valuable features."
"SentinelOne Singularity Identity is very lightweight as an agent or software."
"One of the top things we're interested in is cloud protection."
"All the features within the XDR are valuable as a whole for our organization."
"I like the detection and protection features. We don't need to do anything, and it will alert us when the mitigation is not successful. We only need to target those endpoints. Otherwise, we don't have to do anything about that."
"The threat detection capability is the most valuable feature."
"The reporting tools could be improved in Fortinet FortiSandbox."
"The integration is limited. The solution needs to offer better integration with multiple vendors."
"The delivery feature in my country is extremely bad."
"The main area of concern in Fortinet FortiSandbox is its detection capabilities."
"Something that needs to improve, is the end-point protection."
"I don't know if it is viable to do an improvement like this. When there are passwords in the password-protected files, it can't scan them or do things like this. I don't know if an algorithm or something else could make it better. Nowadays, many legitimate office documents have passwords."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox can improve by decreasing the time of analysis response. Other solutions have a better response time, such as WildFire."
"Product could include a user interface and be made simpler for customers to configure."
"Sometimes I get kicked out of the console. I don't know why."
"Our engineers are dealing with issues to add exclusions to the antivirus for custom applications."
"The policies could be more precise, and Singularity should use more templates like alternative solutions have. Endpoint management is poor. We cannot manage individual endpoints and must rely on policies, exclusions, or block lists to apply settings to a group instead of the individual agent. If I have to make settings for one computer, I need to create a group, apply the configuration, and move the agent there. It's challenging to manage endpoints that way."
"The UI can be more user-friendly."
"I don't like SentinelOne's reporting tools. Their reports seem fine theoretically, but the issue is the sample size. For example, it will report that there were four incidents, and that equals 25 percent fewer incidents compared to the previous months. It would be a great improvement if I could expand the range to see reports for the last six months, but it's always one month. That would be an easy thing for them to resolve."
"A lot of those features came from an acquisition of a different company."
"The root cause of automation could be better."
"We haven't received the expected support whenever we've had questions."
More SentinelOne Singularity Identity Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet FortiSandbox is ranked 5th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 35 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Identity is ranked 12th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 14 reviews. Fortinet FortiSandbox is rated 8.2, while SentinelOne Singularity Identity is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSandbox writes "Light and powerful solution design; useful to have". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Identity writes "It offers deep and continuous visibility into our attack surface". Fortinet FortiSandbox is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Trellix Network Detection and Response, Check Point SandBlast Network, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 and Fortinet FortiEDR, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Identity is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Identity, Qualys VMDR, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Microsoft Defender for Office 365. See our Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. SentinelOne Singularity Identity report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors and best Threat Deception Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
