Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Fortinet and Trellix are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Fortinet is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while Trellix is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.5. Fortinet holds a 11.4% mindshare in ATP, compared to Trellix’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Fortinet FortiSandbox

Read 38 Fortinet FortiSandbox reviews

2,489 Views
1,506 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Trellix Network Detection a...

Read 38 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews

1,278 Views
872 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiSandbox

Trellix Network Detection a...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Trellix Network Detection and Response and Fortinet FortiSandbox both operate in the cybersecurity realm, focusing on advanced threat detection and response. Trellix seems to have the upper hand in investigative depth and visibility, whereas Fortinet excels in integration with its product ecosystem.

Features: Trellix Network Detection and Response offers in-depth analysis tools, including the MVX engine and sandboxing technology, enabling advanced threat detection and forensic capabilities. It provides real-time investigation potential and integrates with other security measures for comprehensive security coverage. Fortinet FortiSandbox is known for its seamless integration with other Fortinet products and provides robust sandboxing environments for analyzing malicious files, along with the capability to emulate various operating systems, making it valuable for threat hunting.

Room for Improvement: Trellix Network Detection and Response could improve in managing false positives, customizing virtual environments, and better integrating with third-party solutions. Suggestions also include more straightforward analytics and simplified setup processes. Fortinet FortiSandbox users seek more virtual environment options and better integration beyond the Fortinet ecosystem. Enhancements in ease of using license management and speeding up analysis are also desired.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer flexible deployment options, whether on-premises, hybrid, or cloud. Trellix is recognized for its responsive technical support and extensive documentation, offering a variety of support contact methods. Fortinet is praised for effective technical support, but its deployment complexity can present challenges. Trellix's proficiency in support contrasts with Fortinet's focus on installation clarity.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix Network Detection and Response is viewed as expensive, but its ROI is justified due to its advanced threat prevention capabilities, making the price barrier acceptable given the security it provides. Fortinet FortiSandbox is usually regarded as reasonably priced, though its licensing can be complex. Both solutions report significant ROI in threat prevention, with Fortinet having a competitive pricing edge despite Trellix's higher cost being backed by its comprehensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,369 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiSandbox

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Threat Deception Platforms (7th)

Trellix Network Detection a...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiSandbox is 11.4%, up from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Network Detection and Response is 5.2%, down from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Kiarash Heydari

Information security manager at asa com

Light and powerful solution design; useful to have

My impression is that the initial setup process is quite straightforward. If you know what you're using it for, the initial setup can be quite easy and the solution is not that hard to use. When it comes to the steps taken for the implementation, you would select the OS you're using and when the files are sent to the appliance you check, and in the appliance configuration, it must be like the visual governance environment. You must set up the OS you have so that appliance can scan or analyze your file. To maintain this solution, you must always have at least one all-around person tuning this solution.

Read full review

BiswabhanuPanda

Senior technical consultant at Hitachi Systems Micro Clinic

Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one

The in-depth investigation capabilities are a major advantage. When the system flags something as malicious, it provides a packet capture of that activity within the environment. That helps my team quickly identify additional context that most other tools wouldn't offer – like source IP or base64 encoded data. We can also see DNS requests and other details that aren't readily available in solutions like Check Point or others that we've tried. The detection itself is solid, and their sandboxing is powerful. There's a learning curve – you need a strong grasp of OS-level changes, process forking, registry changes, and the potential impact of those. But with that knowledge, the level of information Trellix provides is far greater than what we've seen elsewhere. The real-time response capability of Trellix has been quite effective, although it's not very fast. The key is this solution's concept of 'preference zero.' They don't immediately act on a zero-day. For example, the solution has seen a piece of malware for the first time. It'll let it in, then do sandboxing. Maybe after four or five minutes, it identifies that specific file's DNX Secure Store as malicious. At that point, they update the static analysis engine, and it gets detected if anything else tries to download the same file. There is that initial 'preference zero' concept, like with Panda. You may not hold traffic in the network. That's standard in the industry; we don't do much about it. To address that, we also have endpoint solutions. We use SentinelOne in our environment, which helps us identify threats like Western Bureaus and others.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Integration is one of the solution's most valuable aspects. You can integrate even third-party solutions so that they can send the information or files they quarantine through the FortiSandbox"

"The dynamic behavior analysis is excellent. We have many attacks caught by the FortiSandbox as zero-day attacks. Additionally, the administration is simple and can be customized to fit your companies needs."

"Fortinet FortiSandbox's most valuable feature is the security it provides against threats, such as ransomware. Additionally, it integrates well with APIs."

"The real-time analysis capability of FortiSandbox is beneficial for email analysis."

"The product is great. It can be deployed on the cloud or on-premises."

"he solution's GUI is good."

"You have access to a report as to what behaviors the example file entered in the registry."

"FortiSandbox analyzes the behavior of processes in a sandbox environment, which is useful for threat hunting. The solution has an excellent standard configuration, and you can prioritize the types of files of VMs you want to analyze. It also integrates seamlessly with other Fortinet solutions, like FortiGate, FortiMail, and FortiEMS."

More Fortinet FortiSandbox pros

"The most valuable feature is MVX, which tests all of the files that have been received in an email."

"Trellix Network Detection and Response helps increase response to attacks. One benefit is increased visibility and simplicity in maintaining it. AI analyzes and relates data based on past performance over the last five days."

"It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities."

"The server appliance is good."

"It allows us to be more hands off in checking on emails and networking traffic. We can set up a bunch of different alerts and have it alert us."

"Initially, we didn't have much visibility around what is occurring at our applications lower level. For instance, if we are exposed to any malicious attacks or SQL injections. But now we've integrated FireEye with Splunk, so now we get lots of triggers based on policy content associated with FireEye. The solution has allowed for growth and improvement in our information security and security operations teams."

"It protects from signature-based attacks and signature-less attacks. The sandboxing technology, invented by FireEye, is very valuable. Our customers go for FireEye because of the sandboxing feature. When there is a threat or any malicious activity with a signature, it can be blocked by IPS. However, attacks that do not have any signatures and are very new can only be blocked by using the sandboxing feature, which is available only in FireEye. So, FireEye has both engines. It has an IPS engine and a sandbox engine, which is the best part. You can get complete network protection by using FireEye."

"We see ROI in the sense that we don't have to react because it stops anything from hurting the network. We can stop it before we have a bigger mess to clean up."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros

Cons

"I don't know if it is viable to do an improvement like this. When there are passwords in the password-protected files, it can't scan them or do things like this. I don't know if an algorithm or something else could make it better. Nowadays, many legitimate office documents have passwords."

"The initial setup of Fortinet FortiSandbox is complex. You cannot only deploy Fortinet FortiSandbox without deploying the stack of Fortinet solutions. The implementation and integration are challenging tasks with the device and placement in the network. We needed to do POC and offloading testing."

"Most people are confused about how to use the right integration of the right Fortinet product."

"The licensing can be very confusing. It needs to be simplified."

"For the MSSPs, it would be great if the product could display all the threat chains on a dashboard since it is an area where the tool is currently lacking."

"The area I would like this solution to be improved in is the integrations for Sandbox with AI and big data ML mechanisms. I think this would be a practical improvement."

"In the next release, I would like to see machine learning and anti-exploitation included."

"Not practical for real-time web traffic analysis because users won't wait for the FortiSandbox to complete its analysis before accessing content"

More Fortinet FortiSandbox cons

"It would be a good idea if we could get an option to block based upon the content of an email, or the content of a file attachment."

"I heard that FireEye recently was hacked, and a lot of things were revealed. We would like FireEye to be more secure as an organization. FireEye has to be more protective because it is one of the most critical devices that we are using in our environment. They have a concept called SSL decryption, but that is only the packet address. We would like FireEye to also do a lot of decryption inside the packet. Currently, FireEye only does encryption and decryption of the header, but we would like them to do encryption and decryption of the entire packet."

"The solution's support needs to improve their support."

"The initial setup was complex because of the nature of our environment. When it comes to the type of applications and functions which we were looking at in terms of identifying malicious threats, there would be some level of complexity, if we were doing it right."

"It is an expensive solution."

"I would love to see better reporting. Because you can't export some of the reports in proper formats, it is hard to extract the data from reports."

"Technical support could be improved."

"Cybersecurity posture has room for improvement."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing a five or six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high."

"There is a license to use this solution."

"The solution is unavailable at a lower cost and can be difficult to deploy."

"The solution is affordable."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The license for Fortinet FortiSandbox depends on the use case."

"FortiSandbox is a subscription that can be purchased from Fortinet directly. Only using FortiSandbox as features purchased as a subscription in the cloud."

"The price of Fortinet FortiSandbox is expensive."

More Fortinet FortiSandbox pricing and cost advice

"Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."

"It's an expensive solution."

"We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."

"FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."

"The tool is a bit pricey."

"There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."

"The pricing is a little high."

"The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,369 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortinet FortiSandbox?

The real-time analysis capability of FortiSandbox is beneficial for email analysis.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiSandbox?

I think it's affordable. For the six to seven months of usage, the cost has been reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiSandbox?

We sometimes face a delay in email scanning due to not having multiple virtual machines. Improvements could be made in dynamic scanning, scanning all email components such as URLs and attachments, ...

See all answers

What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?

We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?

The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced. It's a bit on the expensive side, but we don't want to compromise with cheap, less r...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?

The solution's support needs to improve their support.

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Fortinet FortiSandbox

Compared 39% of the time

Check Point SandBlast Network vs Fortinet FortiSandbox

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Fortinet FortiSandbox

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Fortinet FortiSandbox

Compared 5% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Fortinet FortiSandbox

Compared 5% of the time

More Fortinet FortiSandbox Competitors

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 17% of the time

Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 9% of the time

Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiSandbox

January 2025

Download Fortinet FortiSandbox product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Network Detection and Response

December 2024

Trellix Network Detection and Response report

Download Trellix Network Detection and Response product report

Also Known As

FortiSandbox

FireEye Network Security, FireEye

Overview

Fortinet FortiSandbox is a behavior-based threat detection solution that prevents and detects malicious code in files transferred within the organization. It is integrated with FortiGate firewalls and FortiMail for threat protection and can be used for monitoring and reporting. The solution inspects files in a virtual environment with different types of virtual machines and can block or quarantine files based on their score.

The most valuable features include dynamic behavior analysis, manual scan features, easy management and configuration, fast scanning, scalability, customization, and ICAP protocol. The solution is cost-effective and faster than other sandbox solutions, with a good user interface.

Fortinet

Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Lush, Barnabas Health, Options, Riverside Healthcare, Hillsbourough County Schools, Columbia Public Schools, Schiller AG

FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

January 2025

Free Report: Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,369 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.