Fortify Software Security Center vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing comparison

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

• Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
• Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
• Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
• Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
• Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.

• Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
• Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
• Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
• Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.