Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Forcepoint and GTB Technologies are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Forcepoint is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while GTB Technologies is ranked #25. Forcepoint holds a 4.4% mindshare in DLP, compared to GTB Technologies’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Forcepoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GTB Technologies users who would recommend it.

Forcepoint Data Loss Preven...

Read 64 Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention reviews

9,099 Views
8,917 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

GTB Technologies Inspector

Read 8 GTB Technologies Inspector reviews

4,011 Views
3,851 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Forcepoint Data Loss Preven...

GTB Technologies Inspector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and GTB Technologies Inspector compete in the data loss prevention category. Forcepoint holds a slight advantage with extensive integration and advanced AI features, while GTB offers better pricing flexibility for smaller enterprises.

Features: Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is equipped with advanced data protection tools, cloud integration capabilities, and an extensive set of predefined templates and OCR. It integrates seamlessly with CASB and SIEM for enhanced compliance. GTB Technologies Inspector emphasizes ease and efficiency with a single-agent setup, a flexible customization option, and strong database connectors, though it offers less support for modern endpoints.

Room for Improvement: Forcepoint could improve integration, language support, and speed up policy management. Enhancements in AI features and quicker technical support are also suggested. GTB Technologies Inspector should focus on handling mobile devices and integrating IRM solutions while enhancing processing times. Simplifying deployment and management would benefit both products.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Forcepoint can be set up in various environments like on-premises and cloud, providing flexibility but often requires complex initial setups with better technical support needed. Customer experiences with its support are mixed, with some reporting delays. GTB Technologies Inspector offers efficient deployment in on-premises and hybrid settings, with a notable and accessible support team.

Pricing and ROI: Forcepoint is seen as a premium offering that delivers value through comprehensive features, appealing mainly to larger enterprises, though its high cost might be prohibitive for smaller businesses. GTB Technologies Inspector is favored for its competitive and flexible pricing structure, which provides substantial value, especially for those with budget constraints. Both solutions show potential for ROI through improved data protection and compliance.

To learn more, read our detailed Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. GTB Technologies Inspector Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. GTB Technologies Inspector

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,262 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Forcepoint Data Loss Preven...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GTB Technologies Inspector

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

25th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is 4.4%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GTB Technologies Inspector is 1.8%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention	4.4%
GTB Technologies Inspector	1.8%
Other	93.8%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Madhukar Pandey

Senior Manager, Risk at LTFS

Quarantine workflows have shifted risk to business and provide strong PII protection across channels

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention can be improved because the options nowadays involve the use of AI. The approach of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is still very traditional, where I have to create the policy for each and everything. The AI component is missing in Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, where based on user behavior analytics, it could give us suggestions. This type of improvement is needed in Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention. Additionally, the hardware costing goes up when it comes to Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention because it requires large resources in the implementation part. Not regarding the user interface, but nowadays other DLP solutions have come up with the CASB part and the SaaS platform they are providing. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is still lagging there, and I have to rely on the on-premises setups. The management part has been difficult as I have to patch the servers, restart them, and regularly take backups. These are a few tedious things that I have to do while managing Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention. This part also needs to be improved in Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention.

Read full review

Marcelo Grandchamp

General Manager (Founder and Owner) at nnhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/marcelograndchamp/ovax

Enables organizations to monitor the network and protect themselves from data leakage

The initial setup process is very simple and easy. We have no issues to do it for ourselves or our customers. The deployment takes less than 20 days. The integration is very simple. However, first, we must understand what we want to have on our network and what we want to prevent. If we don't have this information before we start the configuration, we will be lost. We must know what kind of protection we need in our company. We have LGPD in Brazil. It is similar to GDPR in Europe. It prevents any personal information from being linked to other companies without permission. We have to take care of the personal information of our customers, employees, and partners. To deploy the tool, we must understand what we need to do. We must download the whole package and have our infrastructure ready to receive it. We must get the SSL certification and start to configure our platform. When the process is finished, we must roll out a small portion of our network to ensure everything will be well. After that, we must do the full rollout.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support for the solution is very good."

"The most useful features of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention are the transfer through Bluetooth can be blocked and the transfer to the cloud-based storage can be blocked, and the features are wonderful."

"The tool is fine for the DLP features, especially when you are on an on-premises model with a data center."

"Forcepoint enables you to clarify aspects of your data, including which data to protect for how long, what priority to assign to the data and the destinations. It's a comprehensive, dedicated solution. The interface is user-friendly and easy to manage. No other product will give you the same visibility and data classification functions as this tool."

"Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention has positively impacted my organization because we have managed to keep track of all the emails sent, all the data, and all the proprietary information that's shared, and everything is on a proper track, enabling everyone to classify their information so that nothing is leaked."

"Incident remediation is awesome in Forcepoint."

"Has multiple modules and is good with integration."

"One of the most valuable features is the set of built-in policies that Forcepoint has for PCI compliance. We just need to activate them and start working. Without them, it would be a big task to do a data transformation."

More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention pros

"The most valuable feature is we can develop what we want. If we have an old or new requirement, they are able to support us to develop it all within one month."

"This solution has improved our organization, primarily in helping to develop my business processes, and for confidential government information."

"All features in GTB are very valuable and effective."

"This solution helps classify what is confidential and what is not, allowing products to be installed at home if they do not contain confidential information."

"The product has a centralized console for everything."

"When comparing GTB Technologies Inspector to other solutions you receive a good value for your money when considering all the features and benefits."

"I am impressed with the tool's ease of deployment."

"The classifications in place are very helpful in making policies for ensuring sensitive data can be contained."

More GTB Technologies Inspector pros

Cons

"Everything can be improved and maybe there is a way to improve the user experience through the interface."

"In terms of display, the support and the Mac platform requires a lot of improvement."

"Their discovery or the way they discover the data at risk can also be improved. There are many database servers that are not supported by Forcepoint."

"It would be better if we could easily integrate with other products. Suppose I want to integrate this DLP with some other CASB solutions or a firewall solution. In that case, it takes a considerable amount of time because Forcepoint DLP doesn't come with a legacy firewall or CASB solutions to integrate with it. We need to do it separately. It's not improvised for different sectors, and I need to look for other solutions. I'm investing a lot of time researching and implementing other solutions for other areas. That is one point where I can't feel satisfied with this Forcepoint DLP. The only problem we have faced is that it consumes most of the CPU whenever a Forcepoint DLP is deployed on an endpoint. This is when users feel some lag in their machine's performance or their Internet performance. That's when we uninstall and try to reinstall, or we'll give a cloud link to which it gets access. We use Forcepoint DLP for endpoint protection, not for email or cloud. For email and drive, we went with the Google DLP. Forcepoint DLP isn't as efficient on drive or chat, or email. For that, we have some specialized solutions, but it would be better to have a single console where you can control all these areas. It would be pretty easy for a consumer who is going to use this product. All in one shot, you can try to track it and enforce your policies on a single dashboard. That is one point currently lacking in Forcepoint, and I feel they need to work on it. In the next release, I would like to use this DLP across different solutions like network, firewall, email, or chat with a consolidated dashboard and with integration facilities with other solutions. Security should work as a whole. It shouldn't work individually in blocks. It does not serve our purpose. It should be integrated with multiple solutions. For that, it should have enough intelligence to work with other tools. I'm looking forward to seeing that kind of capability with Forcepoint."

"The main area of concern is the tool's technical support."

"Forcepoint DLP is a bit expensive."

"It would be wonderful if the solution could develop more AI and machine learning capabilities. It would also be good if the solution was able to integrate with other ML and AI solutions. Right now, this is lacking."

"I would recommend aligning OCR with endpoints. This is a highly demanded technology globally, especially for endpoints. Forcepoint should focus on improving this aspect to draw more users from Symantec's side."

More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention cons

"They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac. So, we need those things in Linux and Mac as well."

"The solution’s performance must be improved."

"The solution could improve by providing additional availability requirements."

"The product needs to improve its support so that users can just log in and create tickets as opposed to sending emails. Sending emails is difficult to track. It also needs to work on its analytics platform."

"The tool should include better AI features."

"It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent."

"The performance could be better."

"To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Forcepoint offers a more cost-effective solution because everything, including OCR, is included in one package, unlike Symantec, where it is an add-on with an additional cost."

"This solution is quite expensive."

"The pricing and licensing are okay."

"Pricing for this solution could be better."

"It's not the cheapest solution but it's not the most expensive. It's a good price for a good product."

"The pricing for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is more expensive than Symantec, but it's negotiable. It depends on how well you negotiate. The solution is worth the money, though, based on the services and facilities it provides to my company."

"From one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing to be an eight."

"The solution is expensive."

More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

"They offer a lot of features in a single bundle. So, if you want to remove some features from GTB, you can remove those. You don't need to buy those, and the price will reduce accordingly. I am very happy with the pricing."

"The tool's pricing is affordable and based on the number of endpoints."

"Its price is very reasonable and competitive."

"The tool has a fair price."

"The tool is not expensive."

"When comparing GTB Technologies Inspector to other solutions you receive a good value for your money when considering all the features and benefits."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention?

Need to bare server cost if you are going for on prem setup. License cost is negotiable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention?

My main use case for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is that I have used it for all three channels: the endpoint, web, and email. The main use case is preventing the exfiltration of personally iden...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Compared 8% of the time

Cyera vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Compared 8% of the time

Cyberhaven vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Compared 6% of the time

Trellix DLP vs Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 15% of the time

Trellix DLP vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 6% of the time

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 6% of the time

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 5% of the time

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 5% of the time

More GTB Technologies Inspector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

September 2026

Download Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

September 2026

Download GTB Technologies Inspector product report

Also Known As

Forcepoint DLP, Forcepoint Data Security Suite, Websense Data Security Suite

Inspector, GTB Technologies DLP

Overview

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) helps organizations prevent sensitive data loss across endpoints, AI interactions, web, cloud applications, email, and networks. Forcepoint provides unified policy management and consistent enforcement across channels, giving organizations visibility and control over sensitive data everywhere.

Forcepoint DLP simplifies deployment, policy management, and compliance with 1,800+ predefined classifiers and policy templates covering regulations across 90+ countries and major industries. Forcepoint Risk-Adaptive Protection continuously analyzes user behavior and risk to dynamically adjust DLP enforcement, helping organizations reduce data loss while minimizing unnecessary friction for users.

Forcepoint also uses AI to simplify DLP operations. ARIA, the Adaptive Risk Intelligence Assistant, helps security teams configure and deploy policies, investigate incidents, understand user risk, and surface data security insights using natural language. With unified policies, risk-adaptive enforcement, AI-assisted operations, and flexible on-premises, hybrid, and cloud deployment options, Forcepoint helps organizations protect sensitive data, streamline compliance, and modernize data security without adding unnecessary complexity.

Forcepoint

GTB Technologies Inspector offers a single agent solution for data loss prevention and classification, supporting multiple platforms. Users find it lightweight and effective for real-time protection and encryption, making it suitable for managing sensitive data and preventing data leakage.

GTB Technologies Inspector integrates data classification and leakage prevention in a unified platform, functioning as a Cloud Access Security Broker and firewall. Supporting platforms like Google Cloud and Azure, it monitors sensitive data between departments and third parties, protecting confidential documents and Microsoft 365 from network and endpoint threats. Its centralized console facilitates deployment and monitoring across networks and endpoints. While recognized for its ease of deployment and real-time protection, improvements in processing time, performance, analytics, and support processes are desired. Users seek enhanced information rights management, AI capabilities, and mobile endpoint security with better database security and functionality.

What are the key features?

Single Agent: Integrates DLP and data classification into one solution.
OCR: Offers optical character recognition without extra licensing fees.
Fingerprinting: Includes data fingerprinting for preemptive protection.
Real-Time Protection: Encrypts and decrypts data instantaneously.
Centralized Console: Manages deployments and settings from one location.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Effective Management: Ensures efficient handling of sensitive data across platforms.
Ease of Deployment: Simplifies setup and integration processes.
Customization Options: Adapts to industry-specific needs and changes.
Network and Endpoint Protection: Offers robust security for multiple environments.

In industries like finance and healthcare, GTB Technologies Inspector addresses unique data security concerns, facilitating data classification and regulatory compliance. It efficiently manages cloud access and enforces security policies, safeguarding data shared with third parties. As organizations expand digitally, it provides essential leakage prevention mechanisms, maintaining data integrity without compromising operational efficiency.

GTB Technologies

Sample Customers

Alphawest, Betsson, Cellcom Israel Ltd., Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, Confartigianato Vicenza, EverBank, Finansbank, iGATE, Landa Digital Printing, Northern California Bank, Reliance Capital, Remosa, Toyota, Scavolini, Zim Integrated Shipping Services

Supya Security Software

Buyer's Guide

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. GTB Technologies Inspector

September 2026

Free Report: Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. GTB Technologies Inspector

Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. GTB Technologies Inspector and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. GTB Technologies Inspector report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.