F5 BIG-IP DNS vs Sucuri comparison

F5 and Sucuri Security are both solutions in the Domain Name System (DNS) Security category. F5 is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0, while Sucuri Security is ranked #22. F5 holds a 4.4% mindshare in DS, compared to Sucuri Security’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sucuri Security users who would recommend it.

F5 BIG-IP DNS

Read 21 F5 BIG-IP DNS reviews

1,451 Views
1,451 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sucuri

Read 6 Sucuri reviews

1,045 Views
282 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

F5 BIG-IP DNS

Sucuri

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024

Sucuri and F5 BIG-IP DNS are both distinguished products in their respective fields. User reviews indicate Sucuri offers more favorable pricing and support while F5 BIG-IP DNS excels in features, making it worth the higher cost.

What features are offered by Sucuri in comparison to F5 BIG-IP DNS?

Sucuri users value comprehensive security features and ease of use, including malware detection, DDoS protection, and website firewall. F5 BIG-IP DNS offers advanced traffic management, versatile configuration options, and superior scalability.

What areas of improvement can be found in Sucuri in comparison to F5 BIG-IP DNS?

Sucuri users suggest better customization options, improved peak-time performance, and enhanced reporting. F5 BIG-IP DNS needs simpler configuration processes, better documentation, and improved user interface.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Sucuri in comparison to F5 BIG-IP DNS?

Sucuri is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. F5 BIG-IP DNS, noted for a complex setup, provides robust support to offset these difficulties.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Sucuri in comparison to F5 BIG-IP DNS?

Sucuri has competitive pricing and good ROI, suitable for smaller businesses. F5 BIG-IP DNS, although more expensive, offers high ROI due to its extensive capabilities, ideal for larger enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 BIG-IP DNS vs. Sucuri Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP DNS vs. Sucuri

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,425 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 BIG-IP DNS

Ranking in Domain Name System (DNS) Security

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sucuri

Ranking in Domain Name System (DNS) Security

22nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (37th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Domain Name System (DNS) Security category, the mindshare of F5 BIG-IP DNS is 4.4%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sucuri is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Domain Name System (DNS) Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
F5 BIG-IP DNS	4.4%
Sucuri	1.3%
Other	94.3%

Domain Name System (DNS) Security

Featured Reviews

reviewer2733993

Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Ensures reliable web application security and offers comprehensive load balancing solutions

When it comes to denial of service or DNS security, F5 is not the best vendor as dedicated vendors such as Arbor for denial of service and Infoblox for DNS security offer more comprehensive solutions. The main features such as WAF and load balancing do not generate complaints. F5 BIG-IP DNS is not the best for DNS denial of service because they handle it as part of BIG-IP features, mainly used for GSLB, while other vendors provide complete DDI solutions, including DHCP, DNS, and IP address management, along with specialized DNS security, offering much more than just GSLB and basic recursive DNS security. The two main concerns are DNS related and denial of service, areas where F5 BIG-IP DNS could improve, and they could do better as they are not the best vendor, indicating ample room for improvement especially since those are not their main specialties.

Read full review

Jagobandhu Some

Hardware Engineer at Ministry of Defense

A cost-effective choice for website security and informative support with issues related to CDN quality

One area where they could improve is in providing real-time support options because now you need to open a support ticket and wait for their response. It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance. I have found their Content Delivery Network service to be lacking in quality, and it could certainly be enhanced to provide better performance. I would also like to see improvements in the deployment process, as it currently takes more time than desirable. Another significant concern is that their service when your website is down, turns it into a static site. This means that if customers try to visit your site during downtime, they will see old content from the static site, which is not ideal. The CDN and tracking services are areas that need improvement, as well as addressing their bandwidth limitations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The management is very easy."

"F5 BIG-IP DNS is useful, depending on how you use it."

"F5 provides us with a mechanism to accomplish complex product balancing."

"F5 BIG-IP DNS has been rock solid in terms of stability for years."

"For one of our clients, F5 improved global server load balancing with an active-active site configuration for Disaster Recovery."

"F5 BIG-IP DNS is a stable solution."

"It's very stable."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More F5 BIG-IP DNS pros

"I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server."

"The initial setup was straightforward. Straight forward because the plugin can simply be installed and then it does its job. It's not complex, there is no learning curve. The online scan is simple, you put in the website address and the scan gives us a report on the browser itself. It's simple to use."

"It significantly eases the workload and streamlines the initial setup required to protect a website."

"Domain name scanning since it allows us to scan all our domain names and determine whether it has malware or if is reported as phishing."

"The initial setup was very easy."

"The most valuable part is the analytics and visualization."

Cons

"The analysis services needs improvement."

"I would like to see more marketing documentation, rather than technical documentation."

"The solution can improve by adding cloud integration through plugins or additional configurations so we can use F5 BIG-IP DNS to communicate with the cloud."

"The solution's initial setup is complex compared to Fortinet."

"It would be great to see a F5 BIG-IP DNS cloud version. What we within the Australian government are looking at doing is utilizing a secured DNS service much the same as the English GCHQ version of their protected DNS service."

"The initial setup could be easier."

"The initial setup is a step-by-step process, so it can be a bit complicated for someone who's using it for the first time."

"In the product, one of the shortcomings is related to its configuration part...Though you can find some manuals or F5 documents, in real life, it's very hard to understand this product."

More F5 BIG-IP DNS cons

"It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance."

"Sucuri could provide help for specific security alerts in-line instead of requiring users to search for it in the help section."

"The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection."

"I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything."

"Confident score: Currently it does not have one and there are cases that most websites flagged are false-positives."

"In terms of improvement, the cost factor is always there."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The on-prem version is only available on a yearly license, but the cloud version can be paid for on a day-by-day basis."

"They are competitively priced."

"BIG-IP DNS is more expensive than its competitors like Citrix, but it gives good value for money."

"Cost is a factor. It is really costly."

"This product is quite pricey but if you compare the feature set and its compatibility with similar products on the market, you would understand why it's that price."

"You cannot do much around DDoS protection without an additional license from F5."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being a low price."

"In some cases, it is expensive."

"The ROI has been very good. Because of the solution, I have a tax break. The site developers were not always experienced people. We used to pay more for cleaning up the site when it was infected. Now, we have peace of mind knowing that the solution will clean up the site and that we won't have to go through the unnecessary process of restoring it from a backup. The protection on the WAF and the measures for backups have also prevented our site from going down."

"It stands out as a more cost-effective option compared to other cloud-based security services like Cloudflare or JetPass."

"Sucuri offers different plans, both the standard plan and an advanced plan. So there are different plans to choose from."

"I’d simply say it’s really worth it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Domain Name System (DNS) Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about F5 BIG-IP DNS?

For one of our clients, F5 improved global server load balancing with an active-active site configuration for Disaster Recovery.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IP DNS?

In terms of pricing, F5 BIG-IP is not cheaper compared to other solutions like Fortinet or Citrix. The cost can be high due to its comprehensive modules.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IP DNS?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection vs F5 BIG-IP DNS

Compared 48% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs F5 BIG-IP DNS

Compared 13% of the time

CIRA Anycast DNS vs F5 BIG-IP DNS

Compared 10% of the time

EfficientIP DNS Guardian vs F5 BIG-IP DNS

Compared 7% of the time

BlueCat Edge vs F5 BIG-IP DNS

Compared 7% of the time

More F5 BIG-IP DNS Competitors

Cloudflare vs Sucuri

Compared 32% of the time

SiteLock vs Sucuri

Compared 16% of the time

AWS WAF vs Sucuri

Compared 13% of the time

Comodo cWatch vs Sucuri

Compared 10% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Sucuri

Compared 9% of the time

More Sucuri Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP DNS

December 2025

Download F5 BIG-IP DNS product report

Buyer's Guide

Sucuri

December 2025

Download Sucuri product report

Also Known As

F5 BIG-IP DNS, F5 DNS Delivery

No data available

Overview

F5® BIG-IP® DNS distributes DNS and user application requests based on business policies, data center and cloud service conditions, user location, and application performance. BIG-IP DNS is commonly configured as a full proxy to provide global server load balancing (GSLB) for applications and DNS across architectures, and across the globe.

The BIG-IP platform delivers DNS services with visibility, reporting, and analysis; scales and secures DNS responses geographically to survive increased traffic or threats; delivers a real-time DNSSEC solution; designed to provide availability of global applications in all cloud environments.

Sucuri gives website owners peace of mind with solutions that prevent hackers from abusing websites, and professional response services to those compromised. Sucuri is dedicated to researching the latest and emerging threats affecting websites like yours. Website security should be attainable for all website owners; we focus on making that a reality. Get back to running awesome WordPress websites. Our services are built around three principles – People. Process. Technology.

Sucuri Security

Sample Customers

Ricacorp Properties, Bangladesh Post Office, Shawbrook Bank, Shinsegae Internet Duty Free

The Loft Salon, Tom McFarlin, WPBeginner, Taylor Town, Everything Everywhere, Financial Ducks in a Row, Chubstr, Real Advice Gal, Sujan Patel, Wallao, List25, School the World

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP DNS vs. Sucuri

December 2025

Free Report: F5 BIG-IP DNS vs. Sucuri

Find out what your peers are saying about F5 BIG-IP DNS vs. Sucuri and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our F5 BIG-IP DNS vs. Sucuri report.

See our list of best Domain Name System (DNS) Security vendors.

We monitor all Domain Name System (DNS) Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.