We performed a comparison between F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management."The tool is reliable and easy to configure."
"Our customers have never complained about the stability"
"We have seen a return on investment from F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager. It provided access at a time when we didn't have it."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The performance of the solution is valuable."
"This is a product that is easy to install and integrate, and it is simple to use."
"The load balancing features are valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the virtual IP creation. It's our most frequently used feature."
"The solution is simple to use."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."
"The operational deployment is not great."
"The solution’s GUI looks very old."
"The technical support’s response time must be improved."
"The initial setup was complex."
"In my opinion, the GUI side needs some improvement based on my usage. Sometimes, it doesn't work as efficiently as the CLI side."
"The solution is quite costly."
"Integrating identity providers and single sign-on solutions can simplify user authentication and access control."
"Cloud services are something that F5 Access Policy Manager could do better"
"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."
"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."
"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."
More F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is ranked 9th in Access Management with 13 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 20th in Access Management. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is rated 8.2, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) writes " Facilitates packet inspection, modification, and offloading and offers visibility and troubleshooting capabilities, allowing for pre-production server testing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is most compared with Citrix Gateway, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Remote Desktop Services and Ivanti Connect Secure, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator.
See our list of best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.