Microsoft Entra ID vs Thales SafeNet Trusted Access comparison

Microsoft and Thales Cloud Security are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8, while Thales Cloud Security is ranked #20. Microsoft holds a 27.1% mindshare in SSO, compared to Thales Cloud Security’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Thales Cloud Security users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 192 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

13,868 Views
10,166 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Read 3 Thales SafeNet Trusted Access reviews

735 Views
446 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Microsoft Entra ID and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access are both popular solutions for identity and access management. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is often preferred for its advanced features, while Microsoft Entra ID scores higher in pricing and support.

Features: Microsoft Entra ID offers robust integration capabilities, comprehensive access policies, and reliable customer support. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is praised for its advanced security features, flexible authentication methods, and superior feature set.

Room for Improvement: Users feel Microsoft Entra ID could improve in areas such as detailed reporting, role management, and enhancing its documentation. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access users mention a need for a more intuitive management console, better user interface, and simplified configuration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Entra ID is reported to have a straightforward deployment process and reliable customer support. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access also provides efficient deployment but is noted for superior customer service quality.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Entra ID is generally considered more cost-effective, offering a better perceived ROI among users. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access, while more expensive, is seen as worth the investment due to its feature set. Users are happier with Microsoft Entra ID's pricing but acknowledge Thales offers good value for its price.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 812,628 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

1st

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

1st

Ranking in Access Management

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

192

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (1st), Identity Management (IM) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (4th)

Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

20th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

24th

Ranking in Access Management

20th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2024, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 27.1%, down from 31.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is 1.8%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Vinod Survase

M365 Senior Consultant at Capgemini

Oct 31, 2022

Saves us time and money and features Conditional Access policies, SSPR, and MFA

I want better integration between Azure AD and the on-prem environment because there are currently limitations that can hamper employee experience. We use a feature called password writeback, that can be challenging to implement in a hybrid environment. Employees can change their passwords using a self-service password reset (SSPR) feature, which reflects from the cloud to the on-prem identity, but not the other way around. Currently, there is no way to reflect passwords from on-prem identities to the cloud. There are other similar limitations, such as a cap on the number of identities that can be synchronized in a particular time frame, which can be an issue for large enterprises with 300,000 employees or more.

Read full review

GauravMathur

Vice President Information Technology at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 11, 2021

Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well

I'm not saying that we want to switch the product, however, since the requirement has increased, we are looking at other options that may be better suited. The scalability may not there. We have a few specific use cases where we have to avoid the cloud. Especially in Europe, we're not allowed to carry their phone in factories. We need some sort of secure access solution. There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure. I am paying to SafeNet and in parallel, I also need to pay Microsoft to use the same service. That makes no sense, to pay double. If they could do something about it, that would be very good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A couple of features are valuable, but the one that comes across the most to me is multi-factor authentication."

"The tool's most valuable feature is conditional access."

"The solution is free to use and you can use it for every service."

"Single sign-on is the reason we use AD."

"Technical support has been great."

"We do not have to deploy lots of machines all over the place to run things as a service, which is how we like to deploy things, just as a service."

"The solution allows users to authenticate from home, and the Office 360 integration is advantageous."

"The self-password reset if it's enabled and configured properly, really helps a company be able to reset rather than getting IT involved."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

"The interface is easy to use."

"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."

"The solution is simple to use."

Cons

"Technical support could be better."

"My only pain point in this solution is creating group membership for devices."

"Lacks integration between applications and phones."

"From time to time it takes a little bit of time to replicate, with some of the applications—something like five to 10 minutes. I know that the design is not supposed to enable real-time replication with some of the applications. But, as an administrator, I would like to run a specific change or modification in Azure Active Directory and see it replicated almost immediately."

"Though the installation was seamless, it took longer than expected to be completed."

"The solution has not saved costs. While we’ve eliminated some tools, there are some other features that we are dependent on as admin, which are not yet integrated with Azure AD."

"The thing that is a bit annoying is the inability to nest groups. Because we run an Azure hybrid model, we have nested groups on-premise which does not translate well. So, we have written some scripts to kind of work around that. This is a feature request that we have put in previously to be able to use a group that is nested in Active Directory on-premise and have it handled the same way in Azure."

"One thing that they need to improve is the cost."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."

"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."

"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution can be cheaper."

"The pricing for companies and businesses is okay, it's fair. But if you are trying to teach someone about Azure AD, there is no licensing option for that... It would be nice to have a 'learning' license, one that is cheaper for a single person."

"The price is affordable, and we pay around $100 per month."

"It is costly."

"Microsoft has a free version of Azure AD. So, if you don't do a lot of advanced features, then you can use the free version, which is no cost at all because it is underpinning Office 365. Because Microsoft gives it to you as a SaaS, so there are no infrastructure costs whatsoever that you need to incur. If you use the free version, then it is free. If you use the advanced features (that we use), it is a license fee per user."

"Previously, only building and global administrators could purchase subscriptions or licenses. Mid-last year, Microsoft made it so users can purchase the license online. Microsoft business subscription is for 200 to 300 users. If you have more than 300 users, you can't purchase the business plan. You have to purchase the enterprise plan. The enterprise plan is for 301 users and above. Pay as you go is also available. If you pay as you go in Azure, you will be billed for whatever you use."

"It is a really nice tool and we have a license for the more complex model."

"The solution has three types of tiers: E1 has very basic features. You get limited stuff in E2 and cannot have Office 360 associated with it. E3 is on the costly side and has all the features."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

812,628 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

30%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

51%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

The pricing is expensive. It's in US dollars. I'd rate the affordability of pricing six out of ten.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 8% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 6% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Okta Workforce Identity vs Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Compared 20% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Compared 18% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Compared 11% of the time

Auth0 vs Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Compared 10% of the time

More Thales SafeNet Trusted Access Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

September 2024

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

September 2024

Download Thales SafeNet Trusted Access product report

Also Known As

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

SafeNet Trusted Access, Gemalto SafeNet Trusted Access

Learn More

Microsoft

Thales Cloud Security

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

Thales Cloud Security

Overview

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is a comprehensive access management solution that provides secure and seamless access to cloud and web applications. It offers a range of features, including multi-factor authentication, single sign-on, and adaptive authentication. With SafeNet, organizations can easily manage user access, enforce security policies, and monitor user activity to prevent cyber threats.

The solution is highly scalable and can be customized to meet the unique needs of any organization. Overall, SafeNet is a reliable and effective solution for preventing cyber threats and ensuring secure access to critical applications and data.

Sample Customers

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

IBM, Western Union, Vanderbilt University Medical Centre, Novartis, and AT&T.

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

October 2024

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

812,628 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.