ESP Workload Automation Intelligence vs Tidal by Redwood comparison

Broadcom and Tidal Software by Redwood are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Broadcom is ranked #21, while Tidal Software by Redwood is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.6. Broadcom holds a 2.3% mindshare in WA, compared to Tidal Software by Redwood’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Tidal Software by Redwood users who would recommend it.

ESP Workload Automation Int...

Read 1 ESP Workload Automation Intelligence review

1,090 Views
913 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tidal by Redwood

Read 37 Tidal by Redwood reviews

2,585 Views
1,090 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

ESP Workload Automation Int...

Tidal by Redwood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Tidal by Redwood and ESP Workload Automation Intelligence compete in the automation market. Tidal by Redwood is preferred for its pricing and support, while ESP Workload Automation Intelligence leads in feature richness, offering higher value.

Features: Tidal by Redwood emphasizes comprehensive job scheduling, visual workflows, and intuitive automation for scalable environments. ESP Workload Automation Intelligence is strong in sophisticated analytics, advanced automation, and robust workload management. The main difference is Tidal's user-friendliness contrasted with ESP's advanced analytics and management capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tidal by Redwood has a seamless deployment process with responsive support that minimizes disruptions. ESP Workload Automation Intelligence provides a structured deployment approach with thorough onboarding, potentially requiring more time for configuration. Tidal shines in service efficiency, while ESP is noted for detailed setup.

Pricing and ROI: Tidal by Redwood usually has a lower setup cost, leading to quicker ROI and cost-effectiveness. ESP Workload Automation Intelligence requires a higher initial investment, justified by its extensive capabilities and long-term benefits. The key difference lies in initial cost versus future returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Workload Automation Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ESP Workload Automation Int...

Ranking in Workload Automation

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tidal by Redwood

Ranking in Workload Automation

6th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of ESP Workload Automation Intelligence is 2.3%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tidal by Redwood is 3.9%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

reviewer1609584

Assistant Vice President at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Stable, connects with everything, and has great technical support

The new version is going to have more web services where you could string together various web services so that you can create a workflow across multiple web services, which I don't think is there today. It's not easy to do today. You have to use other tools to accomplish things. However, if the functionality exists, we haven't tested that out yet.

Read full review

Steve Mikula

IT Scheduling Manager at Paychex, Inc.

Very reliable processing engine, and scheduling is flawless—crucial elements in our financial transaction processing

Because we've been on it for 20 years, it's pretty easy for us to automate jobs with Tidal at this point. It has become second nature. It's pretty simplistic to set up and get going, although there are different levels of complexity you can have within the product. It depends on how simple you want to keep it. If you just keep it: Job A, Job B, Job C, Job D, that becomes pretty simple. But when you start integrating some complex calendars that use sub-calendars—and you can go three, four, or five deep to set up schedules—it becomes more complicated. The beauty of it is you can go as deep as you need to. We can get really complex or we can keep it simple. We have some use cases for both scenarios. The thing that I like the most is the reliability of the engine. The actual scheduling part of the product is pretty much flawless, but the stability of the product is what I find to be reassuring. We are a financial company, we move billions of dollars a day, and if we don't have our transactions processed in a timely manner we can be penalized and our clients can be penalized. It can have a serious financial impact.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution can scale."

"Tidal integrates with other third-party systems, which makes it easy to connect and exchange data."

"It's the most efficient tool in doing repetitive tasks and saves a lot of time with minimum possibility of error."

"By leveraging machine learning algorithms, Tidal Automation can use this data to optimize turbine settings and improve overall efficiency and performance."

"The best feature of Tidal Workload Automation Software is its ease of integration with other systems, including ERP, CRM, and BI tools."

"We have to run about 12,000 jobs every day and the majority of them need to be launched from our ERP, JD Edwards. The native compatibility of the Tidal platform with JD Edwards dovetails with our greatest need. It's directly connected to the heart of our IT system. We couldn't work without it."

"It's easy to use and easy to administer, and it's very flexible."

"It has been super stable. There are no complaints on stability. We would not be using it if Tidal wasn't stable."

"From a management standpoint, when using the solution for cross-platform, cross-application workloads, I've never had a problem with the application. It's very interactive, especially with the different security levels that they offer."

More Tidal by Redwood pros

Cons

"The new version is going to have more web services where you could string together various web services so that you can create a workflow across multiple web services, which I don't think is there today."

"One of the weaknesses of the product is, when something happens, it's difficult to find out the root cause. There are a lot of logs you can take a look at in Tidal. Sometimes, they are useful, but other times, they're not. That is mostly relegated to the administrative team. Users for the most part don't see that and don't know anything about that. They just know they have a problem, then it's up to the administrative team to see what happened and figure out the problem."

"Understanding and using Tidal Automation could be overwhelming for someone with minimal programming language."

"My complaint about their pricing model is that every year or every time technology changes or somebody has a new requirement, it usually means that I can schedule that with Tidal, but I would need another adapter. So, every time there is a change, I need a different adapter that I don't have. That's why it is harder to plan for Tidal growth because you have to buy a new adapter every time."

"When we patch to the next version, there is often a little thing that breaks. It has rarely been a big deal, but I always seem to have to follow up on one tiny issue. It would help if they had some better QA testing of their patches."

"They can do better reporting in terms of production statistics reporting."

"Tidal Software interface could be more intuitive and user-friendly."

"The biggest improvement they need to work on is doing better QA checks before they release new patches and service packs. We do find that you can't trust getting the new product right away, as they have to get some bug fixes out. They do tend to have some bugs in the first iteration."

"The user interface is the place that needs the most work. If and when we find issues with the product, they are usually in that area. If I had to choose, that's where I'd want issues, as opposed to in the engine. But the UI is average. It's a little sluggish at times and there are some bugs in it."

More Tidal by Redwood cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Our annual maintenance cost is competitive for what we have and what they do."

"Our licensing model for Tidal is on an annual basis. It is very good and works well for us. Tidal's licensing is very transparent and simple. It lets you know, for the amount you use, that's the price that you pay. So, we buy X number of licenses, and we know that this is where we are. I'm very happy with that. I saw the licensing modules on other platforms, and I didn't like them. Other companies and solutions would calculate the connections, adapters, and instances. I think that's the reason that BMC was pretty expensive: They just didn't understand what our needs are."

"They work with you on licensing. So, it has been great. Everybody has different licensing, but I've had good luck with the licensing. They've been very accommodating. You basically need to buy a license for each physical server, but then you're allowed an unlimited number of virtual servers."

"We are satisfied with the pricing of Tidal. It's in the moderate range and it feels very achievable for us."

"Their pricing seems very fair. It is more than the other solutions, but the functionality and the support are very much there. You pay for the job scheduler, and then they have certain things that are built into it, such as the FTP processes. If you then want to do JD Edwards jobs, you need an adapter. If you want to do SQL jobs, there is another adapter. Similarly, if you want to do Oracle jobs, there is an adapter. It is like there is the base and then there are the adapters for the jobs that you want to do, but it seems that's also how they pay for each of those adapters and keep them up to date."

"Tidal is a low-cost tool and not expensive in comparison to other tools."

"The solution has no hidden costs. It helps me to plan forward into the future. I know that I can add another 100 or a thousand jobs, and that's how much it will cost me today."

"Right now, we are in a good position with the licensing model that we have with the Tidal vendor. So, we won't have any issues. even if we double in our current production. Initially, Tidal provided us some specs where if you have these number of jobs, then you come under this category. They usually provide a range of jobs from 2,000 to 10,000. You can use these specs for your infrastructure. Whether you have 2,000 or 8,000 jobs, Tidal should support it."

More Tidal by Redwood pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

41%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Tidal Automation?

Tidal Automation by Redwood is a user-friendly solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tidal Automation?

The price is reasonable in terms of the product’s functionality.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tidal Automation?

Initially, it is complicated to understand the functionalities as there is limited product documentation. The setup and configuration of the software is a bit complicated. Providing the training vi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs ESP Workload Automation Intelligence

Compared 60% of the time

Stonebranch vs ESP Workload Automation Intelligence

Compared 20% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ESP Workload Automation Intelligence

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs ESP Workload Automation Intelligence

Compared 7% of the time

More ESP Workload Automation Intelligence Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Tidal by Redwood

Compared 43% of the time

Control-M vs Tidal by Redwood

Compared 23% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Tidal by Redwood

Compared 7% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Tidal by Redwood

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Tidal by Redwood

Compared 5% of the time

More Tidal by Redwood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

April 2025

ESP Workload Automation Intelligence report

Download ESP Workload Automation Intelligence product report

Buyer's Guide

Tidal by Redwood

April 2025

Download Tidal by Redwood product report

Also Known As

CA Workload Automation ESP

Tidal Workload Automation, Cisco Workload Automation, Tidal Enterprise Scheduler

Overview

ESP Workload Automation Intelligence is used for managing and optimizing batch workflows. It helps with forecasting workloads, improving job scheduling, and minimizing manual interventions.

Users appreciate ESP Workload Automation Intelligence's ability to identify potential issues before they impact operations. Its seamless integration with existing infrastructures provides valuable insights and enhances operational efficiency. The tool's robust analytics and scalability aid in streamlining complex processes and ensuring timely completion of critical tasks. However, some users have noted limitations with scheduling options, occasional delays in performance, and a need for enhanced customer support.

What are the key features of ESP Workload Automation Intelligence?

Robust Scheduling Capabilities: Allows for effective job scheduling to streamline workflows.
Real-time Monitoring: Facilitates ongoing oversight of workloads to ensure optimal performance.
Detailed Reporting: Provides in-depth reports for better analysis and decision-making.
Advanced Analytics: Offers predictive insights to boost efficiency and reduce manual tasks.
Customizable Automation: Enables flexible automation tailored to specific requirements.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in the reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines complex workflows to enhance overall efficiency.
Reduced Manual Intervention: Decreases the need for manual oversight through automation.
Timely Task Completion: Ensures critical tasks are completed on schedule.
Enhanced Operational Insights: Provides valuable analytics to inform better decision-making.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing systems, making it easier to implement.

Industries implementing ESP Workload Automation Intelligence benefit from its scalability and robust analytics, particularly in sectors requiring stringent job scheduling and precise workload management. Manufacturing companies can streamline production processes, while financial institutions ensure timely batch processing. Healthcare providers might employ it to manage data-heavy tasks efficiently, ultimately enhancing service delivery and operational performance.

Broadcom

Tidal Software is a leading provider of enterprise workload automation solutions that orchestrate the execution of complex workflows across systems, applications and IT environments. With a comprehensive portfolio of products and services, Tidal optimizes mission-critical business processes, increases IT cost efficiencies and satisfies legal and regulatory compliance requirements. Hundreds of customers around the world count on Tidal for modernizing their workload automation and driving their digital transformation. Tidal Software is headquartered in Chicago with offices in Houston, London, Minsk, Belarus and Chennai, India. For more information, visit tidalsoftware.com.

Tidal Software by Redwood

Sample Customers

Sandvik, DHL, Landmark Group, SAIF

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Broadcom, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.