

OpenText Behavioral Signals and Elastic Security compete in security and behavioral analysis technology. Data suggests Elastic Security offers better features, while OpenText provides competitive pricing and support.
Features: OpenText Behavioral Signals includes advanced behavioral analysis focused on improving AI-driven communication. It leverages AI to analyze interactions deeply. Elastic Security features robust threat detection and strong platform integration. It offers comprehensive threat coverage and scalable infrastructure monitoring.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Behavioral Signals could enhance its threat detection capabilities and diversification of feature sets beyond behavioral insights. Integration with additional platforms and refining its AI-driven insights might also be beneficial. Elastic Security would benefit from improvements in deployment speed and simplifying customization processes. Enhancing its UI and user training resources can also be considered.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Behavioral Signals is praised for its easy deployment and responsive customer service. It integrates smoothly into existing systems. Elastic Security offers easy deployment with extensive documentation, yet OpenText leads in customer satisfaction through its attentive service approach.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Behavioral Signals offers a competitive pricing structure that is cost-effective through focused behavioral features. Elastic Security involves higher initial costs, delivering a significant ROI with its extensive security capabilities and comprehensive threat management. OpenText's value is illustrated through affordability, whereas Elastic Security justifies its higher cost with broad functionalities.
It does not require hefty security budgets and can be deployed for enterprise security effectively.
Most of the time when my team encounters issues, they receive responses within 24 hours.
Support is prompt and helpful.
I have not faced any difficulties with Elastic Security, as we have a pretty good support service from them.
It allows us to think about specific use cases, such as gathering malicious IPs in a single view and analyzing threats based on geolocation.
Elastic Security is quite scalable.
In terms of stability, I would rate Elastic a solid eight out of ten.
CrowdStrike and Defender have more established threat intelligence integration due to having a larger client base.
Machine learning algorithms become better with time; as they ingest a huge volume of data, they become better.
My security testing team continuously reports vulnerabilities, and we have to fix and update the versions frequently.
The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building their security infrastructure.
This is beneficial for SMEs as they do not need extensive budgets for security solutions.
Elastic Security is considered cost-effective, especially at lower EPS levels.
Elastic Security is as flexible and configurable as Microsoft Sentinel.
The platform provides more visibility and requires less effort in monitoring.
The most useful features I find in Elastic Security are the forensic ones that allow us to carry deeper analysis into the logs for in-depth investigations, and the dashboards, with the reporting dashboard being quite user-friendly.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Elastic Security | 4.1% |
| OpenText Behavioral Signals | 0.7% |
| Other | 95.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 40 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.
Additional offerings and benefits:
Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.
OpenText Behavioral Signals enhances organizational security monitoring with its robust correlation engine and streamlined dashboard, offering customization to suit different environments like airports or banks.
OpenText Behavioral Signals effectively integrates device logs through its strong correlation engine. The platform's customization options enable tailored alerts to match specific use cases, such as airports or banks. Although it needs more frequent updates to stay aligned with global incidents, it provides a centralized dashboard that ensures comprehensive visibility across networks. Users find the interface intuitive, making rule writing and report access easy, aiding in a comprehensive understanding of the network environment.
What are the key features of OpenText Behavioral Signals?In industries like banking and airports, OpenText Behavioral Signals is implemented for gathering global intelligence from the cloud. It notifies organizations about global attacks and updates its correlation engines. These industries utilize the platform for monitoring and analyzing logs from network devices, security log management, and addressing network challenges like link failures and unauthorized login attempts, ensuring better security posture with behavioral analytics and log integration using Unix and Microsoft-based connectors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.