Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Elastic Search vs Exalead comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Search
Ranking in Indexing and Search
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
71
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (9th), Search as a Service (1st), Vector Databases (3rd)
Exalead
Ranking in Indexing and Search
11th
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Indexing and Search category, the mindshare of Elastic Search is 23.7%, down from 27.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Exalead is 3.2%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Indexing and Search
 

Featured Reviews

Anand_Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Captures data from all other sources and becomes a MOM aka monitoring of monitors
Scalability and ROI are the areas they have to improve. Their license terms are based on the number of cores. If you increase the number of cores, it becomes very difficult to manage at a large scale. For example, if I have a $3 million project, I won't sell it because if we're dealing with a 10 TB or 50 TB system, there are a lot of systems and applications to monitor, and I have to make an MOM (Mean of Max) for everything. This is because of the cost impact. Also, when you have horizontal scaling, it's like a multi-story building with only one elevator. You have to run around, and it's not efficient. Even the smallest task becomes difficult. That's the problem with horizontal scaling. They need to improve this because if they increase the cores and adjust the licensing accordingly, it would make more sense.
reviewer916404 - PeerSpot reviewer
The indexing feature is handy but the user interface and support can be better
I am not sure if I will recommend this solution to others. There should definitely be an improvement in the user interface. It should be more friendly and customize until it's perfect. On a scale from 1 to 10, I rate this solution a six, because there is room for improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"X-Pack provides good features, like authorization and alerts."
"ELK Elasticsearch is 100% scalable as scalability is built into the design"
"The most valuable features are the data store and the X-pack extension."
"I have found the sort capability of Elastic very useful for allowing us to find the information we need very quickly."
"Search is really powerful."
"Using real-time search functionality to support operational decisions has been helpful."
"Data indexing of historical data is the most beneficial feature of the product."
"Elastic Search makes handling large data volumes efficient and supports complex search operations."
"I find the indexing feature the most valuable."
 

Cons

"Dashboards could be more flexible, and it would be nice to provide more drill-down capabilities."
"They could improve some of the platform's infrastructure management capabilities."
"This product could be improved with additional security, and the addition of support for machine learning devices."
"Elastic Enterprise Search could improve the report templates."
"There should be more stability."
"There are some features lacking in ELK Elasticsearch."
"The solution has quite a steep learning curve. The usability and general user-friendliness could be improved. However, that is kind of typical with products that have a lot of flexibility, or a lot of capabilities. Sometimes having more choices makes things more complex. It makes it difficult to configure it, though. It's kind of a bitter pill that you have to swallow in the beginning and you really have to get through it."
"We'd like to see more integration in the future, especially around service desks or other ITSM tools."
"The scalability of the solution is a problem."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the free version for some logs, but not extensive use."
"ELK has been considered as an alternative to Splunk to reduce licensing costs."
"This is a free, open source software (FOSS) tool, which means no cost on the front-end. There are no free lunches in this world though. Technical skill to implement and support are costly on the back-end with ELK, whether you train/hire internally or go for premium services from Elastic."
"I rate Elastic Search's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The tool is not expensive. Its licensing costs are yearly."
"The solution is less expensive than Stackdriver and Grafana."
"The pricing model is questionable and needs to be addressed because when you would like to have the security they charge per machine."
"To access all the features available you require both the open source license and the production license."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Indexing and Search solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ELK Elasticsearch?
Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time anal...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ELK Elasticsearch?
We used the open-source version of Elasticsearch, which was free.
What needs improvement with ELK Elasticsearch?
It would be useful if a feature for renaming indices could be added without affecting the performance of other features. However, overall, the consistency and stability of Elasticsearch are already...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
Seek
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Luigi's Box, OpenText and others in Indexing and Search. Updated: May 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.