Ekran System vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

Ekran System and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Ekran System is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.0, while One Identity is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.4. Ekran System holds a 0.5% mindshare in PAM, compared to One Identity’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ekran System users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Ekran System

Read 1 Ekran System review

163 Views
86 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Read 45 One Identity Safeguard reviews

2,675 Views
787 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Ekran System

One Identity Safeguard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ekran System and One Identity Safeguard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, One Identity and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).

To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ekran System

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Activity Monitoring (4th)

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (6th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Ekran System is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 3.9%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Andreas Lalos

Director of Professional Services at Besecure

Early threat detection and diverse OS support with enhanced security

Ekran System offers a lightweight solution that does not impact the systems where it is implemented. It provides rich metadata for monitored activities and includes threat analysis capabilities for early alerting and investigation of unauthorized actions. Additionally, it supports diverse operating systems and allows for monitoring and enforcement policies, like blocking actions for policy violations, and provides a retention of historical data in a lightweight format.

Read full review

Martin Ajayiobe

Senior Vice President (Infrastructure Systems/Information Security) at MAXUT

Th password vault feature has proven to be most effective for managing privileged access

One Identity Safeguard now prevents unauthorized access to servers by eliminating privileged passwords and requiring all connections to go through a PAM-authorized process. This means no one, including hackers, can access servers without explicit approval, significantly enhancing overall security. One Identity Safeguard is easy to use with a good partner to support you, and it can be up and running within a few days. We have successfully integrated One Identity Safeguard with cloud targets, and the process was straightforward. One Identity Safeguard has improved our incident response time by 300 percent.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It supports diverse operating systems and allows for monitoring and enforcement policies, like blocking actions for policy violations, and provides a retention of historical data in a lightweight format."

"The system is easy to manage, as it is not a system that you will change everything all of a sudden. It evolves most of the time with customer requests."

"It has greatly helped improve our security posture. Safeguard has an option where it will reset passwords on service accounts, then go out to those servers where that service account is running as a service and update the password on it. That makes password changes very easy. We can regularly change passwords now and are planning on making it an annual activity, where all the people who own service accounts will go in and make sure all their passwords get changed, updated, and reset."

"Being able to use a proxy server is an advantage."

"We are able to log and get reporting on all privileged activity that is being performed. We like the fact that we can leverage the session recording feature, which is especially valuable when we're dealing with third-party vendors that have to remote into our our boxes and servers to do any work on behalf of the bank. Now, we can record everything they are doing to ensure that they're only doing the changes that were needed. In addition, we use it to leverage knowledge transfer with our internal staff."

"The solution's most valuable features are the efficiency and the quality of the recording."

"One of the most important aspects is that it is very easy to use and install. It is also agentless, so all of the operations happen more smoothly than any other product."

"The most valuable feature of One Identity Safeguard is the user-friendly interface."

"I like the discovery functionality and the change password feature through the check-in. I also like the bulk import with the help of templates that come with it out of the box. With the help of these few features, my tasks are made easier."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

Cons

"Ekran System could improve in terms of communication to the market, particularly after their rebranding as Shiteka."

"I find it complicated to implement HTTPS monitoring because the documentation is unclear."

"On a scale of one to ten, the stability is an eight."

"It needs more marketing."

"We can't review or audit HTTP and HTTPS. This functionality should be added so that we can review and audit HTTP and HTTPS."

"Some of our users find the functionality a bit complex, and it could be made more user-friendly."

"The SPS could be a lot easier to administrate and the parts should be unified, from a design perspective, so that I can recognize the systems as being part of the same package. They feel like they have been forced together."

"The product uses a lot of resources in current sessions."

"We should be able to create customized connectors in a better way. For ad hoc or special use cases, I sometimes find we have limitations. Improving the way we develop new connectors for non-typical systems would be beneficial."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."

"It is more expensive than Secret Server but way less expensive than CyberArk. As a customer, I would like the pricing to be lower, but it has a good price point."

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

"It is cheaper than CyberArk. Its price is fair."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

25%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ekran System?

The business model has become more complex with changes in feature licensing, yet they provide affordable options, particularly with the standard edition, which doesn't charge for the management co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ekran System?

Ekran System could improve in terms of communication to the market, particularly after their rebranding as Shiteka. The solution does not support other protocols beyond traditional monitoring chann...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ekran System?

The primary use case for Ekran System is third-party vendor monitoring and privileged access management monitoring. It is also used for privilege access management solutions.

See all answers

What do you like most about One Identity Safeguard?

The identity discovery is good, and the performance is pretty good value.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

The pricing of One Identity Safeguard is fairly priced and cheaper than other solutions of the same enterprise level. It provides a good cost-benefit ratio.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

There is room for improvement in integration between modules. The native integration between SPP and SPS, which is currently based on a plugin, could be enhanced. Customization for lookup passwords...

See all answers

Comparisons

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Ekran System

Compared 32% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Ekran System

Compared 30% of the time

TSFactory RecordTS vs Ekran System

Compared 20% of the time

Teramind vs Ekran System

Compared 17% of the time

More Ekran System Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 33% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 18% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 9% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 9% of the time

Fudo PAM vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Activity Monitoring

June 2025

Download Ekran System product report

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

May 2025

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Overview

Get overall user activity tracking with this local, Telnet, and terminal session monitoring software. See any user session in your reports.

Set up advanced video logging for any actions performed with critical applications, data, and IT configuration.

Get platform-independent software to monitor computer activity for Windows, Linux, Citrix, and VMware environments.

Ekran System

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Deloitte, UPS, Seoul National University, KDN, Finat, Constitutional Court of Korea, Ukrsibbank

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, One Identity and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.