Ekran System vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

Ekran System and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Ekran System is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0, while One Identity is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. Ekran System holds a 0.8% mindshare in PAM, compared to One Identity’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ekran System users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Ekran System

Read 1 Ekran System review

590 Views
366 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Read 56 One Identity Safeguard reviews

5,477 Views
3,724 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Ekran System

One Identity Safeguard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ekran System and One Identity Safeguard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Okta and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).

To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,444 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ekran System

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Activity Monitoring (5th)

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (5th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Ekran System is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 4.4%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
One Identity Safeguard	4.4%
Ekran System	0.8%
Other	94.8%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Andreas Lalos

Director of Professional Services at Besecure

Early threat detection and diverse OS support with enhanced security

Ekran System offers a lightweight solution that does not impact the systems where it is implemented. It provides rich metadata for monitored activities and includes threat analysis capabilities for early alerting and investigation of unauthorized actions. Additionally, it supports diverse operating systems and allows for monitoring and enforcement policies, like blocking actions for policy violations, and provides a retention of historical data in a lightweight format.

Read full review

Sindre Toft

Senior Information Technology Consultant at Helse Nord IKT

Centralized privileged access has improved control and now supports secure vendor billing oversight

The transparent mode is a seamless approach when using it. We have some issues with it, but we are working on it to make it work for us. Managing remote access for privileged users with the secure remote access feature is both easy and hard depending on the scenario we face. We have some systems that are easy and take not even a minute to set up, while others take a bit longer. We are in the middle of integrating One Identity Safeguard with the IGA solution, Identity Manager. We have some A2A setups, but it is not optimal. We are using RPA for developers, not actually RPA accounts, but that is something we are working on. We are also using the service account password rotation on the asset to some degree, and we are exploring options there. For integrating One Identity Safeguard, figuring out how password rotation works is a bit difficult because we have to make custom integrations. After that, it was no problem really. For the A2A use, it is not as easy as using something like HashiCorp's password management tools. It is mostly for certain features in One Identity Safeguard that I would like some improvements. Some of the things you can do in entitlements, there is a lot you can do there, but not everything is optimal. You have to have duplicates of a lot of things to make it work the way you want.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It supports diverse operating systems and allows for monitoring and enforcement policies, like blocking actions for policy violations, and provides a retention of historical data in a lightweight format."

"The transparent mode for privileged sessions is one of the best things for customers, because they don't see the system in-between."

"The best feature One Identity Safeguard offers is that it is a pretty new, modern tool that makes extensive use of its API."

"Two-factor authentication has saved us from a couple of brute force attacks on a couple of our C-level executives."

"It provides secure and centralized access to both on-prem and cloud servers, which we did not have before. Previously, there were myriad ways to access our servers, so this centralizing feature is beneficial."

"The most valuable feature of One Identity Safeguard is the user-friendly interface."

"Safeguard is a next-generation tool when it comes to privileged access management."

"I like that One Identity Safeguard lets you configure the maximum number of connections to the target, a configuration I didn't find in its competitor."

"It was super easy to deploy, not complicated, and did not have the hidden Capex that competitors do!"

More One Identity Safeguard pros

Cons

"Ekran System could improve in terms of communication to the market, particularly after their rebranding as Shiteka."

"The automated change of the passwords, which is now integrated, could be improved to be more flexible regarding different systems."

"I would like to see support for RDP over HTTPS so this product can be used in conjunction with the Microsoft terminal."

"We can't review or audit HTTP and HTTPS. This functionality should be added so that we can review and audit HTTP and HTTPS."

"The interface is better now, but it still could be improved a lot. It needs more organization, menus, automatic refresh of information, and Web 2.0."

"For some users, the physical appliance has been a bit buggy."

"Cost-wise, it is a little bit expensive, which makes it difficult to get management approval. Its price should be reduced."

"We are still in the onboarding phase, and it seems very manual. Ideally, a single interface to integrate all these processes would be useful."

"When we compare One Identity Safeguard with CyberArk, we know CyberArk has other tools or other features that are more complex and more useful for the customers."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs."

"It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody."

"They offer a fair price for a robust solution."

"The license is around $3,000 per month."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

University

12%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	39
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ekran System?

The business model has become more complex with changes in feature licensing, yet they provide affordable options, particularly with the standard edition, which doesn't charge for the management co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ekran System?

Ekran System could improve in terms of communication to the market, particularly after their rebranding as Shiteka. The solution does not support other protocols beyond traditional monitoring chann...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ekran System?

The primary use case for Ekran System is third-party vendor monitoring and privileged access management monitoring. It is also used for privilege access management solutions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

We have a separate department that studies setup costs for each product, but as far as my information goes, the pricing and setup costs are very good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

The most common improvement needed is for upgrades. One Identity Safeguard's desktop client should have a faster and easier upgrade process that ensures compatibility.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity Safeguard serves as our Privileged Access Management solution to enforce session management for administrators and allow them to access our systems in recorded sessions, which secures ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Ekran System

Compared 20% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Ekran System

Compared 17% of the time

TSFactory RecordTS vs Ekran System

Compared 15% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Ekran System

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CloudTrail vs Ekran System

Compared 12% of the time

More Ekran System Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 19% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 9% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

BeyondTrust Password Safe vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 5% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Activity Monitoring

March 2026

Download Ekran System product report

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

March 2026

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Overview

Get overall user activity tracking with this local, Telnet, and terminal session monitoring software. See any user session in your reports.

Set up advanced video logging for any actions performed with critical applications, data, and IT configuration.

Get platform-independent software to monitor computer activity for Windows, Linux, Citrix, and VMware environments.

Ekran System

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Deloitte, UPS, Seoul National University, KDN, Finat, Constitutional Court of Korea, Ukrsibbank

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Okta and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.