Ekran System vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

Ekran System and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Ekran System is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.0, while One Identity is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5. Ekran System holds a 0.9% mindshare in PAM, compared to One Identity’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ekran System users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Ekran System

Read 1 Ekran System review

948 Views
578 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Read 88 One Identity Safeguard reviews

9,254 Views
5,830 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Ekran System

One Identity Safeguard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ekran System and One Identity Safeguard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Idira by Palo Alto Networks, One Identity, Okta and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).

To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 904,836 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ekran System

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

23rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Activity Monitoring (4th)

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (2nd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Ekran System is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 4.4%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
One Identity Safeguard	4.4%
Ekran System	0.9%
Other	94.7%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Andreas Lalos

Director of Professional Services at Besecure

Early threat detection and diverse OS support with enhanced security

Ekran System offers a lightweight solution that does not impact the systems where it is implemented. It provides rich metadata for monitored activities and includes threat analysis capabilities for early alerting and investigation of unauthorized actions. Additionally, it supports diverse operating systems and allows for monitoring and enforcement policies, like blocking actions for policy violations, and provides a retention of historical data in a lightweight format.

Read full review

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Associate at DigitalTrack Solutions ind pvt ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It supports diverse operating systems and allows for monitoring and enforcement policies, like blocking actions for policy violations, and provides a retention of historical data in a lightweight format."

"The best feature One Identity Safeguard offers is that it is a pretty new, modern tool that makes extensive use of its API."

"The integration of One Identity Safeguard has had a clear positive impact on both security and operational efficiency, with earlier estimates showing thirty to forty percent fewer password-related tickets and fifty percent faster audit preparation, along with reducing risk and eliminating shared credentials."

"Flexible modes are easily integrated into the customer infrastructure."

"One Identity Safeguard has saved us security time, improved security, better compliance, increased trust in employees, and reduced risk since the tools provided by the company are now in safer hands."

"The solution's most valuable features are the efficiency and the quality of the recording."

"There are numerous valuable data protection features, including the content and information that offer us more scalable protection as needed."

"One Identity Safeguard has improved security a lot by controlling privileged access, and it also reduced risks since all sensitive activities are monitored and logged."

"Since using One Identity Safeguard, we have more control over who accesses what, especially regarding vendors, and we have seen billing actually go down because we now know how long vendors have been on the server and how long they have worked on it."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

Cons

"Ekran System could improve in terms of communication to the market, particularly after their rebranding as Shiteka."

"From a usability perspective, what we are finding out is that our privileged domain admin users, in particular, want functionality for extending a checkout session. So we are working with One Identity support to see if there's an enhancement that can be made to the product."

"The main thing that needs improvement is the slowness. Apart from that, the change password check-in feature also needs improvement because it is not working perfectly accurately."

"I think the aspects that could be improved in One Identity Safeguard include the learning curve, since the installation is complex and expert guidance is required in the first steps."

"The Transparent Mode could be somewhat easier to use."

"For some users, the physical appliance has been a bit buggy."

"I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated."

"Reporting and dashboard customization with One Identity Safeguard should be better improved."

"We would like to have the option of importing assets by using the CSV file. It was available in the earlier versions, but it is not available now."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs."

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"We have a yearly license. The cost depends on how much a company wants to invest in technology. In our organization, we believe in modern digitization and automation processes so we found it affordable. One Identity was not that much less than other solutions and it is not a cheap solution. There were number of cheaper solutions. However, it's the most effective, according to our evaluation."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

"It is more expensive than Secret Server but way less expensive than CyberArk. As a customer, I would like the pricing to be lower, but it has a good price point."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Outsourcing Company

11%

Retailer

10%

University

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	89
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	36

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ekran System?

The business model has become more complex with changes in feature licensing, yet they provide affordable options, particularly with the standard edition, which doesn't charge for the management co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ekran System?

Ekran System could improve in terms of communication to the market, particularly after their rebranding as Shiteka. The solution does not support other protocols beyond traditional monitoring chann...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ekran System?

The primary use case for Ekran System is third-party vendor monitoring and privileged access management monitoring. It is also used for privilege access management solutions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

Pricing, setup cost, and licensing are managed by the management team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity Safeguard is a very strong privileged access management solution, and the only thing that needs to be enhanced is its dashboard customization; apart from this, everything is perfect.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity Safeguard is used primarily to secure privileged credentials, enforce control over administrative access, and provide visibility into privileged activities. Whenever a network or serve...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS CloudTrail vs Ekran System

Compared 23% of the time

TSFactory RecordTS vs Ekran System

Compared 14% of the time

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Ekran System

Compared 13% of the time

Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Ekran System

Compared 13% of the time

Teramind vs Ekran System

Compared 10% of the time

More Ekran System Competitors

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 14% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 7% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 5% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 4% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Activity Monitoring

June 2026

Download Ekran System product report

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

June 2026

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Overview

Ekran System is a comprehensive insider threat detection and employee monitoring tool designed for businesses seeking efficient security solutions. It offers powerful features ideal for protecting sensitive data and ensuring compliance with industry regulations.

Ekran System caters to companies needing to monitor internal activities effectively. It provides robust insider threat management by capturing user sessions and analyzing behavioral patterns. This tool supports various industries, aiming to reduce data breaches and increase accountability. Ekran System offers multiple deployment options, making it easily adaptable to different organizational environments.

What are the key features of Ekran System?

Session Recording: Monitors and records user activity for in-depth security analysis.
User Behavior Analytics: Identifies unusual behavior patterns by analyzing data.
Access Management: Offers granular control over devices and applications.
Real-Time Alerts: Immediately notifies administrators of suspicious activities.
Audit and Compliance: Provides detailed reports to meet compliance standards.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Risk Mitigation: Helps prevent insider threats and data breaches through vigilant monitoring.
Increased Security: Strengthens data protection and accountability measures.
Regulatory Compliance: Ensures adherence to legal and industry-specific mandates.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring processes, reducing manual tasks.

Ekran System is used in industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. It helps financial institutions monitor transactions, supports healthcare compliance with regulations like HIPAA, and assists manufacturers in safeguarding intellectual property through detailed monitoring of employee activities.

Ekran System

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Deloitte, UPS, Seoul National University, KDN, Finat, Constitutional Court of Korea, Ukrsibbank

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Idira by Palo Alto Networks, One Identity, Okta and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

904,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.