Eggplant Test vs PractiTest comparison

Keysight Technologies and PractiTest are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.3, while PractiTest is ranked #17. Keysight Technologies holds a 3.3% mindshare in TMT, compared to PractiTest’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PractiTest users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,848 Views
577 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

PractiTest

Read 7 PractiTest reviews

723 Views
405 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

PractiTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

PractiTest and Eggplant Test are two leading testing tools with distinct strengths in the software testing category. PractiTest users are happier with pricing and customer support, while Eggplant Test is favored for its robust features and overall value.

Features: PractiTest is recognized for its comprehensive test management capabilities, customizable dashboards, and powerful reporting tools. Eggplant Test stands out for its advanced automation features, cross-platform testing, and ease of integration with various CI/CD pipelines.

Room for Improvement: PractiTest users mention the need for more intuitive navigation and enhanced automation tools. Eggplant Test users highlight areas such as improved documentation and user training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PractiTest offers a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer support noted for its timeliness. Eggplant Test also provides an easy deployment process but receives mixed reviews regarding customer support responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: PractiTest is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and satisfactory ROI by its users. Eggplant Test, while more expensive, is considered worth the investment due to its feature-rich platform and the efficiency gains it provides.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. PractiTest Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. PractiTest

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Management Tools

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

PractiTest

Ranking in Test Management Tools

17th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 3.3%, down from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PractiTest is 3.0%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Eggplant Test	3.3%
PractiTest	3.0%
Other	93.7%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Dave Carter

Test Team Lead at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat

It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for different projects. As an example, if you connect PractiTest to Jira for one project, that's the one you have to use for all projects. We had a requirement to connect with Jira for one project, and a different tool for another, project but it was unable to accommodate that unfortunately. I would therefore like to see it easier to integrate with bug tracking tools at project level which would give each project the opportunity to use a different bug tracker if required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Prior to using the product, all regression testing was done manually for our POS system, and now regression test packs are 70% automated."

"GUI testing is the strength of the tool. The tool works as expected, and the support response from eggPlant, as a company, has been quick and substantial."

"It provides very strong cross-platform support."

"It has enabled true end-to-end testing."

"It is easy to set up."

"These days I use only Eggplant since it is very easy to use, especially in the function test, and in the UI test, and it's better than other tools."

"The solution is based on a Windows model, where adding users is just a few clicks. It is easy to manage users and add them."

"Everything is happening on the layout or display that is used by the user. Eggplant prompts processes, like 'click here,' or 'look for this image.' Eggplant makes it possible for QA people and BAs, working in the actual display, to check if the software is providing the right images, the right text, and the right results. They don't have to go inside the code or to the TCP/IP layer. Everything is happening at the highest level."

More Eggplant Test pros

"In addition, we found PractiTest very user-friendly and customizable."

"Converting a couple of these test plans into PractiTest was amazing and made a world of difference."

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

"Helped organise the manual test cases so they were documented correctly, which was invaluable as it allowed for reviewing and improving of test scripts so they could be followed by a number of different people which helped with resourcing."

"PractiTest gives us the opportunity to control the testing process efficiently and saves us a lot of time that we had to spend while using other tools."

"Since we started using this product, our organization's testing functionality has really improved."

"Technical support of PractiTest is awesome. They are always ready to help in any time zone, which makes them stand out from others."

"This is a good solution for a global transnational company."

Cons

"They need to update the Linux. I think it's kind of an outdated Java Swing application."

"It has low productivity."

"Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price."

"The language is too specific; it is just for Eggplant."

"eggPlants data input is text based and does not easily conform to data driven test, and this makes data management painful."

"We were not able to write code as fast as with the competing open-source software, so that needs to be improved."

"Eggplant Test should emphasize on improving its offering in non-Windows environments."

"The biggest issue I had was the crashing. You could be in the middle of setting up and writing up a nice little script and then it would crash."

More Eggplant Test cons

"Needs to improve adding the ability to run tests multiple times and setting different parameters."

"It does not offer server installation, only software as a service."

"There are some features that I would like added: an option to export a part of tests with steps."

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time."

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

"PractiTest practically requires a lot of sandboxing, demos with their team, and online tutorials."

"Yes, there are times when server is very slow in response."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 17% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 6% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 4% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 4% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest

Compared 11% of the time

TFS vs PractiTest

Compared 10% of the time

Parasoft Development Testing Platform vs PractiTest

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest

Compared 9% of the time

Jira vs PractiTest

Compared 8% of the time

More PractiTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

March 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

March 2026

Download PractiTest product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

No data available

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.

Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
Release your products with confidence and control.

PractiTest

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. PractiTest

March 2026

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. PractiTest

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. PractiTest and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. PractiTest report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.