Eggplant Test vs PractiTest comparison

Keysight Technologies and PractiTest are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.3, while PractiTest is ranked #17. Keysight Technologies holds a 3.6% mindshare in TMT, compared to PractiTest’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PractiTest users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,597 Views
504 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

PractiTest

Read 7 PractiTest reviews

599 Views
317 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

PractiTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

PractiTest and Eggplant Test are two leading testing tools with distinct strengths in the software testing category. PractiTest users are happier with pricing and customer support, while Eggplant Test is favored for its robust features and overall value.

Features: PractiTest is recognized for its comprehensive test management capabilities, customizable dashboards, and powerful reporting tools. Eggplant Test stands out for its advanced automation features, cross-platform testing, and ease of integration with various CI/CD pipelines.

Room for Improvement: PractiTest users mention the need for more intuitive navigation and enhanced automation tools. Eggplant Test users highlight areas such as improved documentation and user training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PractiTest offers a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer support noted for its timeliness. Eggplant Test also provides an easy deployment process but receives mixed reviews regarding customer support responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: PractiTest is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and satisfactory ROI by its users. Eggplant Test, while more expensive, is considered worth the investment due to its feature-rich platform and the efficiency gains it provides.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. PractiTest Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. PractiTest

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Management Tools

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

PractiTest

Ranking in Test Management Tools

17th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (23rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 3.6%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PractiTest is 3.0%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Eggplant Test	3.6%
PractiTest	3.0%
Other	93.4%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Dave Carter

Test Team Lead at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat

It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for different projects. As an example, if you connect PractiTest to Jira for one project, that's the one you have to use for all projects. We had a requirement to connect with Jira for one project, and a different tool for another, project but it was unable to accommodate that unfortunately. I would therefore like to see it easier to integrate with bug tracking tools at project level which would give each project the opportunity to use a different bug tracker if required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Everything is happening on the layout or display that is used by the user. Eggplant prompts processes, like 'click here,' or 'look for this image.' Eggplant makes it possible for QA people and BAs, working in the actual display, to check if the software is providing the right images, the right text, and the right results. They don't have to go inside the code or to the TCP/IP layer. Everything is happening at the highest level."

"It provides very strong cross-platform support."

"Eggplant Test is valuable due to its OCR technology, which is independent of underlying technologies and can identify applications based on labels such as 'username' and 'password'."

"We did see a massive return on investment from using Eggplant."

"The main feature of Eggplant Test is that it can do fully automated web testing and app testing."

"The most valuable features would be the image recognition and the OCR."

"Good text reading ability."

"DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use the controller to run scripts rather than having to translate things to models. There are lots of options."

More Eggplant Test pros

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

Cons

"They need to update the Linux. I think it's kind of an outdated Java Swing application."

"The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans."

"Since there are very few customers in the Indian region, there is no training available, and it's challenging to find skilled talent."

"I would like to see standardized actions already built into Eggplant. For example, "wait eight seconds". That way, I wouldn't need to create it as an action. Right now, I have to program that wait and describe it as an action so that everybody knows it is an action that waits eight seconds... That way, somebody who is not familiar with programming processes like "if-else", or "for", or "while", would be able, from the first moment, and without programming, to put some easy-to-use, standardized, actions in place."

"The solution would crash from time to time."

"If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."

"Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price."

"The reporting function is a bit shallow. The solution does not offer very comprehensive reporting in terms of your test results. The reporting time and the logs are very high level as well. These areas need improvement."

More Eggplant Test cons

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 16% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Parasoft Development Testing Platform vs PractiTest

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest

Compared 13% of the time

Jira vs PractiTest

Compared 13% of the time

TestRail vs PractiTest

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest

Compared 12% of the time

More PractiTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

January 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

December 2025

Download PractiTest product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

No data available

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.

Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
Release your products with confidence and control.

PractiTest

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. PractiTest

December 2025

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. PractiTest

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. PractiTest and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. PractiTest report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.