IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs PractiTest comparison

IBM and PractiTest are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. IBM is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.8, while PractiTest is ranked #21. IBM holds a 3.3% mindshare in ALM, compared to PractiTest’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PractiTest users who would recommend it.

IBM Engineering Lifecycle M...

Read 19 IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) reviews

1,404 Views
991 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

PractiTest

Read 7 PractiTest reviews

173 Views
117 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Engineering Lifecycle M...

PractiTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 30, 2025

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management ELM and PractiTest compete in the engineering project management solutions category. PractiTest has the advantage due to its robust feature set.

Features: ELM offers integrated tools for requirements, quality, and problem management, enhancing project oversight. PractiTest provides flexible test management capabilities, advanced reporting features, and comprehensive testing control.

Room for Improvement: ELM could enhance its test management linkage with stories and issue tracking. Streamlined integration with non-IBM tools would benefit users further. PractiTest may improve by offering more competitive initial pricing and enhancing its support for non-testing functions. Opportunities exist to expand its deployment models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ELM provides extensive customer support, aiding in successful deployments. PractiTest emphasizes a faster setup process with its versatile deployment model and efficient integrations.

Pricing and ROI: IBM ELM offers competitive pricing aimed at enterprises looking for full project integration, providing value through comprehensive lifecycle management. PractiTest, although higher in initial cost, demonstrates strong ROI for organizations prioritizing advanced test management, justifying its features over time.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs. PractiTest Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs. PractiTest

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Lifecycle M...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

13th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PractiTest

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

21st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) is 3.3%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PractiTest is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Juergen Albrecht

Managing Director at CCC Systems Engineering Suisse GmbH

Combining tools for effective data analysis while customization and integration need improvement

The most valuable feature is how IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) ( /products/ibm-engineering-lifecycle-management-elm-reviews ) allows me to present to the customer what the actual software, even hardware, will do. It helps them gain an impression of the complexity of the functionality and find an easier way to decide whether to implement it. A picture says more than one thousand words, which is why I work with the combination of ELM and the specification of DOORS. The automation capabilities I built use column-based scripts for analysis to search, fetch, and transfer information. When I open modules, it automatically analyzes the changes since the last opening by me.

Read full review

Dave Carter

Test Team Lead at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Flexible and intuitive with easy reporting, and good support that is instantly available through chat

It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different bug tracking tools at the same time. This is not an issue if you only have one bug tracker but we can potentially use different tools for different projects. As an example, if you connect PractiTest to Jira for one project, that's the one you have to use for all projects. We had a requirement to connect with Jira for one project, and a different tool for another, project but it was unable to accommodate that unfortunately. I would therefore like to see it easier to integrate with bug tracking tools at project level which would give each project the opportunity to use a different bug tracker if required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The transition to a SaaS-based solution is a distinct advantage."

"You can customize the board according to your needs."

"IBM Rational ALM is a very good tool. I like the management and traceability features and the test management tool. The latter is not linked with the stories and fixed management. It is really useful, and we can create test plans. We can also test some metrics related to QA."

"It is relatively easy to use and user-friendly once the setup is complete."

"The most valuable feature is the reporting of the CPU usage on the dashboard."

"It helped us contain critical things, like source code and several documents, which is very important to us."

"The tools for requirement capture we have found very useful."

"The solution is customizable."

More IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) pros

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

Cons

"The user interface requires significant improvement as it is overly complex."

"In the next release, we expect a traceability metrics configuration where we can configure the user stories. We also expect them to improve or simplify the query process."

"Improvement is needed in bridging DNG and Rhapsody and vice versa for better data exchange from both sides with some trigger technologies."

"The interconnectivity between packages is a major support problem and can be improved."

"Some improvements to the user interface (UI) would be helpful, such as exposing more services to make it easier to customize to the needs of each customer."

"The stability of this solution can be improved."

"The features should be more intuitive. If I'm looking for something, its location should be easy to locate."

"The GUI is a little bit outdated."

More IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) cons

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a contract, but I am not aware of the details."

"The price of the solution could be reduced. Many of our customers are not using all the features and this could be why our clients feel the price is too high."

"IBM Rational ALM has both monthly and yearly licensing options."

"The solution is not cheap."

"This product is a little expensive and we had to pay extra to have them set it up for us."

"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

26%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Transportation Company

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Rational ALM?

The solution is customizable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Rational ALM?

The user interface requires significant improvement as it is overly complex. For business users with no experience in IT, it can be particularly challenging to understand the UI and create test cas...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Rational ALM?

We use IBM Rational ALM as part of our overall application suite for our manufacturing company. It is used by our engineering team to capture requirements, perform testing, and manage defects. Spec...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jira vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)

Compared 28% of the time

Codebeamer vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)

Compared 19% of the time

Polarion ALM vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)

Compared 11% of the time

PTC Integrity vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)

Compared 10% of the time

More IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest

Compared 30% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest

Compared 28% of the time

Jira vs PractiTest

Compared 23% of the time

TestRail vs PractiTest

Compared 19% of the time

More PractiTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)

April 2025

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) report

Download IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

April 2025

Download PractiTest product report

Also Known As

IBM Engineering Rhapsody, Rational ALM, MKS

No data available

Overview

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management stands out for its robust Agile Scrum planning, lifecycle traceability, and tool management, offering cloud-based configurability and strong collaboration features.

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management provides rich capabilities for Agile project management, facilitating requirements and test management, configuration management, and version control. Its integration with IBM Doors supports comprehensive requirements handling, and the cloud-based platform enhances collaborative efficiency across teams. Despite needing advances in user-friendliness and reporting, ELM's global configuration and compliance features make it invaluable in demanding environments.

What are the key features of IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management?

Scrum-based planning: Supports Agile methodologies with rich planning tools.
Lifecycle traceability: Offers complete traceability across development stages.
Customizable workflows: Adaptable workflows with Kanban for flexibility.
Git integration: Supports efficient version control and collaboration.
Global Configuration: Manages complex configurations globally.
Compliance and reporting: Ensures robust auditing and comprehensive reporting capabilities.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Collaboration: Enhanced sharing across platforms for seamless teamwork.
Cost-effectiveness: Delivers efficient tools that optimize project spend.
Comprehensive requirement handling: Facilitates detailed requirement management through IBM Doors integration.

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management is vital in sectors like automotive and manufacturing, where it implements Agile frameworks to manage requirements, conduct testing, and handle defects. It integrates into development pipelines ensuring live traceability and visibility, supporting critical engineering processes efficiently.

IBM

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.

Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
Release your products with confidence and control.

PractiTest

Sample Customers

Tennis Australia, WeCloud AB, Port Otago Limited, Logicalis US, Valmer, The Chevrolet Volt, Ashurst

Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman

Buyer's Guide

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs. PractiTest

April 2025

Free Report: IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs. PractiTest

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs. PractiTest and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs. PractiTest report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.