We performed a comparison between Eclipse MicroProfile and Oracle Application Development Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Java Frameworks solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Provides a lightweight runtime."
"The solution is stable."
"We use the solution to create microservices."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of integration with other Oracle products."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the business components."
"The best part of Oracle ADF is being able to easily write code in Java with JavaBean files."
"We can create objects that allow us to develop pages and applications very rapidly."
"The most valuable feature of the Oracle Application Development Framework is the rapid development and the security it provides."
"There are several valuable features. First is the fast deployment. Also the ease of use."
"It's database-centric, and it's seemingly easy to use the model–view–controller pattern that's built-in."
"The single sign-on features applied to Oracle Cloud is a valuable feature. All parts of this application are compatible with single sign-on, where you have a security feature that is very good in Oracle Cloud."
"Deployment of microservers in the Kubernetes environment is difficult."
"Its performance speed could be improved while working on the browser."
"The tool needs to improve its messaging."
"I use JDeveloper along with ADF and, unfortunately, JDeveloper is a very slow tool. It takes a lot of time to accomplish things with it during both development and deployment. I hope that Oracle will improve JDeveloper to make it run faster."
"The performance of this solution needs to be improved because it is very slow."
"You need to have Oracle ADF on-premises to build a big project. You need to have a dependable front-end application."
"The UI is very slow and not up to market standard."
"The application needs to be more lightweight and the performance improved."
"Lacks tailoring to geographic regional differences and consistent integration with third parties."
"The model layer could be improved for performance because once that part gets bloated, the performance is lacking. So, there is room for performance optimization."
"Oracle Application Development Framework is set to go out of support over the next three years but they should provide support for the solution for the longer term. Additionally, there needs to be more overall optimization and specifically in webpage rendering. The solution uses a lot of resources, and in order for them to move forward, they would have to create a smaller resource impact."
More Oracle Application Development Framework Pricing and Cost Advice →
Eclipse MicroProfile is ranked 6th in Java Frameworks with 3 reviews while Oracle Application Development Framework is ranked 8th in Java Frameworks with 9 reviews. Eclipse MicroProfile is rated 8.4, while Oracle Application Development Framework is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Eclipse MicroProfile writes "Scalable solution with an easy initial setup process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Application Development Framework writes "Eases the writing of code in Java with JavaBeans; easy to set up". Eclipse MicroProfile is most compared with Spring Boot, Jakarta EE, Amazon Corretto, Vert.x and Open Liberty, whereas Oracle Application Development Framework is most compared with Spring Boot, Jakarta EE, Spring MVC and Apache Spark. See our Eclipse MicroProfile vs. Oracle Application Development Framework report.
See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.
We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
