Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Eclipse MicroProfile vs Spring Boot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Eclipse MicroProfile
Ranking in Java Frameworks
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Spring Boot
Ranking in Java Frameworks
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Java Frameworks category, the mindshare of Eclipse MicroProfile is 7.1%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spring Boot is 39.9%, down from 42.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Java Frameworks
 

Q&A Highlights

NC
Nov 25, 2021
 

Featured Reviews

Idris Oyibo Igagwu - PeerSpot reviewer
Scalable solution with an easy initial setup process
We use the solution for managing large programs, customer interactions, testing, and calculation purposes of our finance-based company The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to support dynamic developer profiles. We can easily create multiple accounts and rooms for different…
RajuGottupalli - PeerSpot reviewer
Minimizes a lot of coding, improves the time to market, and is easily deployable and configurable
Spring Boot is a bounded framework. The services we develop are purely synchronous services, so there's a blocking and waiting state. This is a big problem in microservices. To avoid this problem, we have to make the service a reactive session. It has to be reactive to a particular load, particular condition, or based on the number of requests hitting the particular service. All these factors make the service a reactor. There's another module in which Spring Boot provides spring reflex. This module enables the reactiveness of the service, meaning that it eliminates the blocking and waiting state. For example, if you're sending a get operation or a post operation, there won't be any waiting for it to actually hit that particular network to get the data from another service. It continuously flows the request, and there is a zero waiting pack. Vert.x is another good framework where there are similar features or similar benefits with having a reactive session. Spring Boot is a license resource, so it's a framework where we can customize our solution or a particular requirement to build a good solution using Spring Boot. But it's an opinionated framework, meaning that it's completely bounded. You have only one direction to find a solution, whereas Vert.x is an unopinionated framework. Unopinionated is a kind of a toolkit where you can have more optimization and a more flexible solution, which is suitable to your requirements. In Spring Boot, the opportunities are limited. With Vert.x and other programming tools, we have multiple options to explore the solution in a different way and achieve a nonfunctional requirement of thousands transactions in a second. Spring Boot might not support this kind of non-functional requirement. Vert.X is a very good solution to solve critical NFRs for a particular application.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is stable."
"We use the solution to create microservices."
"Provides a lightweight runtime."
"The Spring Cloud Gateway, Load Balancer are the valuable features. Apart from them, handling a sync call, then multiple service communication through field clients are also useful features."
"Features that help with monitoring and tracking network calls between several micro services."
"The most valuable feature of Spring Boot is all the interactions to various applications happen using Spring Boot."
"The solution's framework is stable."
"Spring Boot's configuration is easy, and it has an out-of-the-box deployment."
"The most valuable feature of Spring Boot is it reduces the configuration needed. The configuration is handled by the solution. For example, if you're going to develop a web service, we needed to have a Tomcat web server and had to deploy the services and do tests. However, with Spring Boot, the default server comes with Spring Boot which reduces the task of doing all the configuration."
"The solution reduces our development time."
"It is a stable solution."
 

Cons

"The tool needs to improve its messaging."
"Deployment of microservers in the Kubernetes environment is difficult."
"Its performance speed could be improved while working on the browser."
"Spring Boot can improve the dependency tree that we use for libraries. It would be helpful if it was less complex."
"The cloud packaging is not very straightforward."
"Spring Boot could improve the interface, error handling, and integration performance."
"The solution has some vulnerabilities and fails our security audits, forcing us to keep fixing the solution."
"Having to restart the application to reload properties."
"This solution could be improved if there were more libraries available. We would also like more mobile platform functionality using low levels of code."
"The solution could improve its flexibility."
"Nothing really comes to mind in terms of areas of improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution is an open-source tool."
"Spring Boot is an open source solution, it is free to use."
"This solution is free unless you apply for support."
"I am using a free version of Spring Boot."
"It's an open-source solution."
"Spring Boot is free; even the Spring Tools Suite for Eclipse is free."
"Spring Boot is an open-source solution."
"If you want support there is paid enterprise version with support available."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
University
8%
Financial Services Firm
30%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Spring Boot or Eclipse MicroProfile?
Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, whic...
What do you like most about Spring Boot?
1. Open Source2. Excellent Community Support -- Widely used across different projects -- so your search for answers would be easy and almost certain.3. Extendable Stack with a wide array of availab...
Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offe...
What needs improvement with Spring Boot?
Spring Boot's cost could be cheaper.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Eclipse MicroProfile vs. Spring Boot and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.