Eclipse MicroProfile vs Jakarta EE comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Eclipse Foundation Logo
4,455 views|3,973 comparisons
Eclipse Foundation Logo
10,538 views|9,091 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Eclipse MicroProfile and Jakarta EE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Java Frameworks solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Eclipse MicroProfile vs. Jakarta EE Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Provides a lightweight runtime.""The solution is stable.""We use the solution to create microservices."

More Eclipse MicroProfile Pros →

"Configuring, monitoring, and ensuring observability is a straightforward process.""Jakarta EE's best features include REST services, configuration, and persistent facilities. It's also incredibly cloud friendly.""The feature that allows a variation of work space based on the application being used."

More Jakarta EE Pros →

Cons
"Its performance speed could be improved while working on the browser.""Deployment of microservers in the Kubernetes environment is difficult.""The tool needs to improve its messaging."

More Eclipse MicroProfile Cons →

"It would be great if we could have a UI-based approach or easily include the specific dependencies we need.""All the customization and plugins can make the interface too slow and heavy in some situations.""Jakarta EE's configuration could be simpler, which would make it more useful as a developer experience."

More Jakarta EE Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I would rate Jakarta EE's pricing seven out of ten."
  • More Jakarta EE Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, which… more »
    Top Answer:This is currently an open-source solution.
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offers… more »
    Top Answer:Configuring, monitoring, and ensuring observability is a straightforward process.
    Top Answer:Enhancements in configurations can be achieved by benchmarking against Spring Boot technology. It would be great if we could have a UI-based approach or easily include the specific dependencies we… more »
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 12 in Java Frameworks
    Views
    4,455
    Comparisons
    3,973
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    213
    Rating
    8.3
    4th
    out of 12 in Java Frameworks
    Views
    10,538
    Comparisons
    9,091
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    323
    Rating
    6.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Many innovative "microservice" Enterprise Java environments and frameworks already exist in the Java ecosystem. These projects are creating new features and capabilities to address microservice architectures -- leveraging both Java EE and non-Java EE technologies.

    The goal of the Eclipse MicroProfile project is to iterate and innovate in short cycles to propose new common APIs and functionality, get community approval, release, and repeat. Eventually, the outputs of this project could be submitted to the Eclipse Jakarta EE, JCP, OpenJDK or any relevant standards body.

    Jakarta EE is a powerful platform for developing enterprise-level Java applications. It provides a set of specifications and APIs that enable developers to build scalable, secure, and portable applications. Jakarta EE is built on the foundation of Java EE, which has been widely adopted by organizations around the world.

    One of the key features of Jakarta EE is its support for distributed computing. It includes APIs for building distributed applications, such as remote method invocation (RMI) and message-driven beans. This allows developers to create applications that can run on multiple servers and communicate with each other seamlessly.

    Another important aspect of Jakarta EE is its focus on security. It provides a comprehensive set of security APIs and features, including authentication, authorization, and encryption. This ensures that applications built with Jakarta EE are robust and protected against potential security threats.

    Portability is also a major advantage of Jakarta EE. It allows developers to write applications that can run on any Jakarta EE-compliant server, regardless of the underlying operating system or hardware. This makes it easier to deploy and maintain applications across different environments.

    In addition, Jakarta EE offers a wide range of APIs and specifications for various enterprise-level services, such as database access, messaging, and web services. This simplifies the development process and allows developers to focus on building business logic rather than dealing with low-level details.

    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Eclipse MicroProfile vs. Jakarta EE
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Eclipse MicroProfile vs. Jakarta EE and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Eclipse MicroProfile is ranked 6th in Java Frameworks with 3 reviews while Jakarta EE is ranked 4th in Java Frameworks with 3 reviews. Eclipse MicroProfile is rated 8.4, while Jakarta EE is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Eclipse MicroProfile writes "Scalable solution with an easy initial setup process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jakarta EE writes "A robust enterprise Java capabilities with complex configuration involved, making it a powerful choice for scalable applications while requiring a learning curve". Eclipse MicroProfile is most compared with Spring Boot, Amazon Corretto, Vert.x and Open Liberty, whereas Jakarta EE is most compared with Spring Boot, Spring MVC, Amazon Corretto, Apache Spark and Vert.x. See our Eclipse MicroProfile vs. Jakarta EE report.

    See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.

    We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.