No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Eclipse MicroProfile vs Spring MVC comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Eclipse MicroProfile
Ranking in Java Frameworks
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Spring MVC
Ranking in Java Frameworks
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Java Frameworks category, the mindshare of Eclipse MicroProfile is 7.4%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spring MVC is 7.2%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Java Frameworks Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Eclipse MicroProfile7.4%
Spring MVC7.2%
Other85.4%
Java Frameworks
 

Featured Reviews

Idris Oyibo Igagwu - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration Developer at FHI 360
Scalable solution with an easy initial setup process
We use the solution for managing large programs, customer interactions, testing, and calculation purposes of our finance-based company The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to support dynamic developer profiles. We can easily create multiple accounts and rooms for different…
Arkabrata  Ghosh - PeerSpot reviewer
Java developer at Marlabs Inc.
A scalable tool with great auto-configuration capabilities
The best feature of Spring MVC is its auto-configuration capabilities. A user need not configure anything in the product as it offers configuration files to set profiling and guide users with what they need to connect for development, staging, or production. The auto-configuration is one of the best components of the solution.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is stable."
"Provides a lightweight runtime."
"A great feature is the lightweight runtime."
"We use the solution to create microservices."
"The most valuable feature is simplicity."
"Dependency Injection is one of the major features which makes our life easier using Spring. It is well documented and has active communities, which provide us enormous help."
"Spring has a speedy development process with a lightweight framework."
"The interface is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"It provides the best documentation for technical support."
"We appreciate that this product is really easy to integrate with third-party UI services."
"I am today able to spin up a Java web service, especially with embedded Tomcat, within hours."
"Spring gives you the opportunity to develop architecture in the simplest way possible. It comes with everything you would want in terms of security. If you want to access the database, you have the ability to do that."
 

Cons

"The most difficult part is deployment of the microservers in the Kubernetes environment and building the mechanisms for automated testing."
"The tool needs to improve its messaging."
"Its performance speed could be improved while working on the browser."
"Spring MVC could improve the integration with DevOps and other applications."
"The newer versions of Spring MVC have released a lot of features that we are not using right now because, in many cases, we are limited to running older versions. As such, it would be nice if Spring were to improve support for upgrading to newer versions, especially for legacy applications."
"I expect the solution to offer and include a lot of packages so that it can be configured more easily or the speed level increases, thereby helping it overcome its shortcomings."
"The link with UI components could be improved."
"Spring IDE​ needs some work and improvement. We have faced many issues when adding third-party Eclipse plugins."
"It could provide faster performance."
"Adding more modules takes about 10 to 15 minutes each. It would be nice if they could reduce that part. The deployment time is a little high."
"I saw some error messages coming up when they were getting problems actually viewing all the reports."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We are using the open-source version of the solution."
"It is an open-source solution."
"The solution is free."
"Spring MVC is open source and free."
"This is an open-source solution, so there are no license costs involved with using it."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
University
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Spring Boot or Eclipse MicroProfile?
Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, whic...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Spring by Pivotal, Spring, Spring Framework
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
EMC, Aridhia, CoreLogic, CenturyLink, Humana, Purdue University, Tampon Run, ArtsPool, Charity Water, Center for ReSource Conservation, Manos Teatrales
Find out what your peers are saying about Eclipse MicroProfile vs. Spring MVC and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.