No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Eclipse MicroProfile vs Spring MVC comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Eclipse MicroProfile
Ranking in Java Frameworks
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Spring MVC
Ranking in Java Frameworks
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Java Frameworks category, the mindshare of Eclipse MicroProfile is 7.5%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spring MVC is 6.1%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Java Frameworks Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Eclipse MicroProfile7.5%
Spring MVC6.1%
Other86.4%
Java Frameworks
 

Featured Reviews

Idris Oyibo Igagwu - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration Developer at FHI 360
Scalable solution with an easy initial setup process
We use the solution for managing large programs, customer interactions, testing, and calculation purposes of our finance-based company The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to support dynamic developer profiles. We can easily create multiple accounts and rooms for different…
reviewer2151066 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Straightforward setup, highly stable, and useful online support
We are using Spring MVC based on our business problem statements One of the most valuble features for our business is the bootstrap which allows our developers to save time when developing code. Additionally, it has a built-in library that is useful. The most valuable features of Spring MVC are…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is stable."
"We use the solution to create microservices."
"A great feature is the lightweight runtime."
"Provides a lightweight runtime."
"The most valuable feature is simplicity."
"The most valuable feature of Spring MVC is the configuration, such as WAF."
"The interface is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"We appreciate that this product is really easy to integrate with third-party UI services."
"Spring gives you the opportunity to develop architecture in the simplest way possible."
"We have found this to be a stable solution, and have not experienced any performance issues during our time using it."
"The solution can scale."
"When we shifted from our legacy frameworks to the Spring framework, we discovered that Spring definitely made our development easier."
 

Cons

"Deployment of microservers in the Kubernetes environment is difficult."
"The most difficult part is deployment of the microservers in the Kubernetes environment and building the mechanisms for automated testing."
"Its performance speed could be improved while working on the browser."
"The tool needs to improve its messaging."
"The newer versions of Spring MVC have released a lot of features that we are not using right now because, in many cases, we are limited to running older versions."
"Adding more modules takes about 10 to 15 minutes each. It would be nice if they could reduce that part. The deployment time is a little high."
"I expect the solution to offer and include a lot of packages so that it can be configured more easily or the speed level increases, thereby helping it overcome its shortcomings."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward."
"It can be difficult for a basic user to understand the concepts in this solution, such as inversion of control."
"I saw some error messages coming up when they were getting problems actually viewing all the reports."
"The link with UI components could be improved."
"I have recently had problems with the changes that were made using Spring Security."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution is free."
"Spring MVC is open source and free."
"It is an open-source solution."
"We are using the open-source version of the solution."
"This is an open-source solution, so there are no license costs involved with using it."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
889,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
University
12%
Insurance Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Marketing Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Spring Boot or Eclipse MicroProfile?
Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, whic...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Spring by Pivotal, Spring, Spring Framework
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
EMC, Aridhia, CoreLogic, CenturyLink, Humana, Purdue University, Tampon Run, ArtsPool, Charity Water, Center for ReSource Conservation, Manos Teatrales
Find out what your peers are saying about Eclipse MicroProfile vs. Spring MVC and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
889,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.