Apache Spark vs Oracle Application Development Framework comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
4,283 views|3,325 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
1,561 views|1,027 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Spark and Oracle Application Development Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Java Frameworks solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Apache Spark vs. Oracle Application Development Framework Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Provides a lot of good documentation compared to other solutions.""This solution provides a clear and convenient syntax for our analytical tasks.""One of Apache Spark's most valuable features is that it supports in-memory processing, the execution of jobs compared to traditional tools is very fast.""Now, when we're tackling sentiment analysis using NLP technologies, we deal with unstructured data—customer chats, feedback on promotions or demos, and even media like images, audio, and video files. For processing such data, we rely on PySpark. Beneath the surface, Spark functions as a compute engine with in-memory processing capabilities, enhancing performance through features like broadcasting and caching. It's become a crucial tool, widely adopted by 90% of companies for a decade or more.""It is useful for handling large amounts of data. It is very useful for scientific purposes.""Spark can handle small to huge data and is suitable for any size of company.""Spark helps us reduce startup time for our customers and gives a very high ROI in the medium term.""Its scalability and speed are very valuable. You can scale it a lot. It is a great technology for big data. It is definitely better than a lot of earlier warehouse or pipeline solutions, such as Informatica. Spark SQL is very compliant with normal SQL that we have been using over the years. This makes it easy to code in Spark. It is just like using normal SQL. You can use the APIs of Spark or you can directly write SQL code and run it. This is something that I feel is useful in Spark."

More Apache Spark Pros →

"The most valuable features of this solution are the business components.""The single sign-on features applied to Oracle Cloud is a valuable feature. All parts of this application are compatible with single sign-on, where you have a security feature that is very good in Oracle Cloud.""There are several valuable features. First is the fast deployment. Also the ease of use.""The best part of Oracle ADF is being able to easily write code in Java with JavaBean files.""We can create objects that allow us to develop pages and applications very rapidly.""It's database-centric, and it's seemingly easy to use the model–view–controller pattern that's built-in.""The power of Oracle ADF is in the business components.""The most valuable feature of the Oracle Application Development Framework is the rapid development and the security it provides."

More Oracle Application Development Framework Pros →

Cons
"The solution’s integration with other platforms should be improved.""In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, do the transformation in a subsecond, and all that.""We use big data manager but we cannot use it as conditional data so whenever we're trying to fetch the data, it takes a bit of time.""They could improve the issues related to programming language for the platform.""One limitation is that not all machine learning libraries and models support it.""The product could improve the user interface and make it easier for new users.""Needs to provide an internal schedule to schedule spark jobs with monitoring capability.""I would like to see integration with data science platforms to optimize the processing capability for these tasks."

More Apache Spark Cons →

"Oracle Application Development Framework is set to go out of support over the next three years but they should provide support for the solution for the longer term. Additionally, there needs to be more overall optimization and specifically in webpage rendering. The solution uses a lot of resources, and in order for them to move forward, they would have to create a smaller resource impact.""I use JDeveloper along with ADF and, unfortunately, JDeveloper is a very slow tool. It takes a lot of time to accomplish things with it during both development and deployment. I hope that Oracle will improve JDeveloper to make it run faster.""The model layer could be improved for performance because once that part gets bloated, the performance is lacking. So, there is room for performance optimization.""The application needs to be more lightweight and the performance improved.""Lacks tailoring to geographic regional differences and consistent integration with third parties.""Oracle ADF needs more components and the layout can be improved.""The UI is very slow and not up to market standard.""You need to have Oracle ADF on-premises to build a big project. You need to have a dependable front-end application."

More Oracle Application Development Framework Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Since we are using the Apache Spark version, not the data bricks version, it is an Apache license version, the support and resolution of the bug are actually late or delayed. The Apache license is free."
  • "Apache Spark is open-source. You have to pay only when you use any bundled product, such as Cloudera."
  • "We are using the free version of the solution."
  • "Apache Spark is not too cheap. You have to pay for hardware and Cloudera licenses. Of course, there is a solution with open source without Cloudera."
  • "Apache Spark is an expensive solution."
  • "Spark is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
  • "On the cloud model can be expensive as it requires substantial resources for implementation, covering on-premises hardware, memory, and licensing."
  • "It is an open-source solution, it is free of charge."
  • More Apache Spark Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost of this solution is approximately $47,000 USD per site."
  • "We use a lot of Oracle products and in total, we pay about £5 million ($6.1 million USD) per year."
  • "We have yearly licensing costs."
  • "The solution has an annual licensing cost and there are only standard fees. If you want Oracle support this is charged extra on top of the licensing fees."
  • "Oracle ADF is an expensive product. I don't know the actual figures, but our licensing costs for the year 2020, for example, were very high."
  • More Oracle Application Development Framework Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use Spark to process data from different data sources.
    Top Answer:In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, and do the transformation in a subsecond
    Top Answer:Oracle ADF is an expensive product. I don't know the actual figures, but our licensing costs for the year 2020, for example, were very high.
    Top Answer:The model layer could be improved for performance because once that part gets bloated, the performance is lacking. So, there is room for performance optimization. On the View Controller part, the UI… more »
    Ranking
    2nd
    out of 12 in Java Frameworks
    Views
    4,283
    Comparisons
    3,325
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    432
    Rating
    8.7
    8th
    out of 12 in Java Frameworks
    Views
    1,561
    Comparisons
    1,027
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    401
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Oracle ADF
    Learn More
    Overview

    Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory

    Oracle ADF is an end-to-end Java EE framework that simplifies application development by providing out-of-the-box infrastructure services and a visual and declarative development experience. Oracle ADF simplifies Java EE development by minimizing the need to write code that implements the application’s infrastructure allowing the developers to focus on the features of the actual application. Oracle ADF provides these infrastructure implementations as part of the framework. It also implements the Model-View-Controller design pattern and offers an integrated solution that covers all the layers of the architecture integrated with the Oracle SOA and WebCenter Portal frameworks.

    Sample Customers
    NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions
    Financial Regulatory Authority (FRA) of Egypt, Red Samurai, ChB Jelly House
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    University9%
    Marketing Services Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apache Spark vs. Oracle Application Development Framework
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Spark vs. Oracle Application Development Framework and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Spark is ranked 2nd in Java Frameworks with 60 reviews while Oracle Application Development Framework is ranked 8th in Java Frameworks with 9 reviews. Apache Spark is rated 8.4, while Oracle Application Development Framework is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Apache Spark writes "Reliable, able to expand, and handle large amounts of data well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Application Development Framework writes "Eases the writing of code in Java with JavaBeans; easy to set up". Apache Spark is most compared with Spring Boot, AWS Batch, Spark SQL, SAP HANA and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, whereas Oracle Application Development Framework is most compared with Spring Boot, Spring MVC and Jakarta EE. See our Apache Spark vs. Oracle Application Development Framework report.

    See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.

    We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.