Apache Spark vs Oracle Application Development Framework comparison

Apache and Oracle are both solutions in the Java Frameworks category. Apache is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.8, while Oracle is ranked #8. Apache holds a 8.4% mindshare in JF, compared to Oracle’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Apache Spark

Read 67 Apache Spark reviews

3,754 Views
1,351 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Developm...

Read 9 Oracle Application Development Framework reviews

582 Views
576 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Apache Spark

Oracle Application Developm...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Spark and Oracle Application Development Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Java Frameworks solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Spark vs. Oracle Application Development Framework Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Spark vs. Oracle Application Development Framework

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 871,688 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Spark

Ranking in Java Frameworks

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Hadoop (2nd), Compute Service (4th)

Oracle Application Developm...

Ranking in Java Frameworks

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Java Frameworks category, the mindshare of Apache Spark is 8.4%, up from 7.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Development Framework is 4.4%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Java Frameworks Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Apache Spark	8.4%
Oracle Application Development Framework	4.4%
Other	87.2%

Java Frameworks

Featured Reviews

Omar Khaled

Data Engineer at a tech company with 10,001+ employees

Empowering data consolidation and fast decision-making with efficient big data processing

I can improve the organization's functions by taking less time to make decisions. To make the right decision, you need the right data, and a solution can provide this by hiring talent and employees who can consolidate data from different sources and organize it. Not all solutions can make this data fast enough to be used, except for solutions such as Apache Spark Structured Streaming. To make the right decision, you should have both accurate and fast data. Apache Spark itself is similar to the Python programming language. Python is a language with many libraries for mathematics and machine learning. Apache Spark is the solution, and within it, you have PySpark, which is the API for Apache Spark to write and run Python code. Within it, there are many APIs, including SQL APIs, allowing you to write SQL code within a Python function in Apache Spark. You can also use Apache Spark Structured Streaming and machine learning APIs.

Read full review

Asad Ur Rehman

ERP Manager | Implementation Head at Tharsol

Eases the writing of code in Java with JavaBeans; easy to set up

My advice to anyone who intends to use ADF for the first time is that you must make sure that you have powerful enough hardware in order to run everything smoothly, especially when it comes to JDeveloper. If your hardware is adequate, you can get by without a problem in terms of speed, but be advised that it can use a lot of resources. However, even though ADF is a good product with great scalability that has really helped me out in hard times since 2014, I would ultimately recommend that new users look toward Oracle APEX instead of ADF. I would rate Oracle Application Development Framework a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Spark can handle small to huge data and is suitable for any size of company."

"Provides a lot of good documentation compared to other solutions."

"We use Spark to process data from different data sources."

"DataFrame: Spark SQL gives the leverage to create applications more easily and with less coding effort."

"With Hadoop-related technologies, we can distribute the workload with multiple commodity hardware."

"The most significant advantage of Spark 3.0 is its support for DataFrame UDF Pandas UDF features."

"The product’s most valuable features are lazy evaluation and workload distribution."

"Spark helps us reduce startup time for our customers and gives a very high ROI in the medium term."

More Apache Spark pros

"The most valuable feature is the ease of integration with other Oracle products."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the business components."

"There are several valuable features. First is the fast deployment. Also the ease of use."

"The power of Oracle ADF is in the business components."

"The single sign-on features applied to Oracle Cloud is a valuable feature. All parts of this application are compatible with single sign-on, where you have a security feature that is very good in Oracle Cloud."

"The most valuable feature of the Oracle Application Development Framework is the rapid development and the security it provides."

"The best part of Oracle ADF is being able to easily write code in Java with JavaBean files."

"It's database-centric, and it's seemingly easy to use the model–view–controller pattern that's built-in."

More Oracle Application Development Framework pros

Cons

"When you first start using this solution, it is common to run into memory errors when you are dealing with large amounts of data."

"They could improve the issues related to programming language for the platform."

"We've had problems using a Python process to try to access something in a large volume of data. It crashes if somebody gives me the wrong code because it cannot handle a large volume of data."

"The main concern is the overhead of Java when distributed processing is not necessary."

"The setup I worked on was really complex."

"There were some problems related to the product's compatibility with a few Python libraries."

"Apache Spark is very difficult to use. It would require a data engineer. It is not available for every engineer today because they need to understand the different concepts of Spark, which is very, very difficult and it is not easy to learn."

"It needs a new interface and a better way to get some data. In terms of writing our scripts, some processes could be faster."

More Apache Spark cons

"Oracle ADF needs more components and the layout can be improved."

"The performance of this solution needs to be improved because it is very slow."

"I use JDeveloper along with ADF and, unfortunately, JDeveloper is a very slow tool. It takes a lot of time to accomplish things with it during both development and deployment. I hope that Oracle will improve JDeveloper to make it run faster."

"You need to have Oracle ADF on-premises to build a big project. You need to have a dependable front-end application."

"The UI is very slow and not up to market standard."

"Lacks tailoring to geographic regional differences and consistent integration with third parties."

"The model layer could be improved for performance because once that part gets bloated, the performance is lacking. So, there is room for performance optimization."

"The application needs to be more lightweight and the performance improved."

More Oracle Application Development Framework cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Apache Spark is an expensive solution."

"It is quite expensive. In fact, it accounts for almost 50% of the cost of our entire project."

"Licensing costs can vary. For instance, when purchasing a virtual machine, you're asked if you want to take advantage of the hybrid benefit or if you prefer the license costs to be included upfront by the cloud service provider, such as Azure. If you choose the hybrid benefit, it indicates you already possess a license for the operating system and wish to avoid additional charges for that specific VM in Azure. This approach allows for a reduction in licensing costs, charging only for the service and associated resources."

"We are using the free version of the solution."

"Apache Spark is an open-source tool."

"It is an open-source platform. We do not pay for its subscription."

"On the cloud model can be expensive as it requires substantial resources for implementation, covering on-premises hardware, memory, and licensing."

"It is an open-source solution, it is free of charge."

More Apache Spark pricing and cost advice

"We use a lot of Oracle products and in total, we pay about £5 million ($6.1 million USD) per year."

"The solution has an annual licensing cost and there are only standard fees. If you want Oracle support this is charged extra on top of the licensing fees."

"The cost of this solution is approximately $47,000 USD per site."

"We have yearly licensing costs."

"Oracle ADF is an expensive product. I don't know the actual figures, but our licensing costs for the year 2020, for example, were very high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

871,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	32

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Spark?

We use Spark to process data from different data sources.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Spark?

Apache Spark is open-source, so it doesn't incur any charges.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Spark?

Regarding Apache Spark, I have only used Apache Spark Structured Streaming, not the machine learning components. I am uncertain about specific improvements needed today. However, after five years, ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Spring Boot vs Apache Spark

Compared 23% of the time

AWS Batch vs Apache Spark

Compared 10% of the time

SAP HANA vs Apache Spark

Compared 9% of the time

AWS Lambda vs Apache Spark

Compared 8% of the time

Apache NiFi vs Apache Spark

Compared 6% of the time

More Apache Spark Competitors

Spring Boot vs Oracle Application Development Framework

Compared 52% of the time

Jakarta EE vs Oracle Application Development Framework

Compared 24% of the time

Spring MVC vs Oracle Application Development Framework

Compared 13% of the time

More Oracle Application Development Framework Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Spark

October 2025

Download Apache Spark product report

Buyer's Guide

Java Frameworks

September 2025

Oracle Application Development Framework report

Download Oracle Application Development Framework product report

Also Known As

No data available

Oracle ADF

Overview

Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory

Apache

Oracle ADF is an end-to-end Java EE framework that simplifies application development by providing out-of-the-box infrastructure services and a visual and declarative development experience. Oracle ADF simplifies Java EE development by minimizing the need to write code that implements the applicationâs infrastructure allowing the developers to focus on the features of the actual application. Oracle ADF provides these infrastructure implementations as part of the framework. It also implements the Model-View-Controller design pattern and offers an integrated solution that covers all the layers of the architecture integrated with the Oracle SOA and WebCenter Portal frameworks.

Oracle

Sample Customers

NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions

Financial Regulatory Authority (FRA) of Egypt, Red Samurai, ChB Jelly House

Buyer's Guide

Apache Spark vs. Oracle Application Development Framework

September 2025

Free Report: Apache Spark vs. Oracle Application Development Framework

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Spark vs. Oracle Application Development Framework and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

871,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Spark vs. Oracle Application Development Framework report.

See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.

We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.