We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and SolarWinds Pingdom based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Dynatrace has allowed us to pinpoint quickly any pain points our clients experience with our applications and respond accordingly."
"We can be more productive and agile. It allows us to be more accurate when we need to work with bugs."
"A monitoring system that can show us code level details."
"One of the most valuable features of Dynatrace is that it offers good visibility. It's better than other APM tools. You're not required to use a different technology when you have Dynatrace because it will work whether you're hosting it on Windows or Linux."
"We use it, in many instances, to find the root cause in production."
"Dynatrace helps to build business and non-business dashboards and the appropriate alarming on mail groups."
"The most valuable features are end user visibility, Smartscape, and the entire visibility of our data center, including SQL queries."
"It's very easy to reach the root cause of the problems in the applications, due do the analysis with Dynatrace. The timeframe to update and fix the applications has been reduced a lot compared to what we had before Dynatrace."
"There are alerting mechanisms in place to let us know, for example, if a device is not responding to a ping test and is probably not going to work."
"One notable feature of this software is its page speed setup, which is highly commendable. Additionally, the metrics it provides are also impressive."
"The most valuable features are monitoring and reporting."
"Once you set the threshold on your environment, it feels very real-time"
"There are a couple gaps in the network reporting that we would like to see cleared up a bit."
"Enterprise Synthetic of DC RUM can be made more robust."
"Need better mapping to true business service rather than purely technical monitoring."
"For the user, for the customer, they expect a solution to be not so expensive."
"The flexibility when it comes to integrating with other tools is very low."
"The problem evaluation feature is an awesome idea, but bit difficult to pick up initially."
"I believe that something related to IoT devices should be improved."
"I find it is very difficult to train someone in using this application. As amazing as it can be, the learning curve is extensive."
"I would like to see better integration with other products."
"Some of the functions could improve by making them easier."
"Technical support could use some improvement."
"Pingdom is always improving everything in its product. So, they should work on the GUI."
Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 340 reviews while SolarWinds Pingdom is ranked 47th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 4 reviews. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while SolarWinds Pingdom is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds Pingdom writes "High performance, quick setup, but lacking ease of use". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas SolarWinds Pingdom is most compared with Azure Monitor, Grafana, Solarwinds Web Performance Monitor and New Relic. See our Dynatrace vs. SolarWinds Pingdom report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
