DX NetOps vs Statseeker comparison

Broadcom and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #45 with an average rating of 8.3, while Techniche is ranked #63 with an average rating of 7.0. Broadcom holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 8 DX NetOps reviews

1,219 Views
1,097 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

538 Views
479 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and DX NetOps are solutions in network performance monitoring. DX NetOps offers a more comprehensive feature set, preferred for enterprises with complex needs, while Statseeker is recognized for speed and efficiency.

Features: Statseeker offers fast, detailed analytics, minimal data retention requirements, and rapid deployment capabilities. DX NetOps includes extensive integration capabilities, advanced AI-driven insights, and broad network management functions.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker could benefit from enhanced integration features, more advanced analytics, and expanded configuration options. DX NetOps might improve in areas such as simplifying deployment processes, reducing costs, and optimizing performance for smaller environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Statseeker provides a straightforward deployment process with strong support, enabling quick setups. DX NetOps is slightly more complex to deploy but compensates with robust customer service and detailed resources.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker is favored for lower setup costs and fast ROI, providing good value for small to medium businesses. DX NetOps has higher costs but offers ROI through its robust feature set, making it suitable for enterprises seeking advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Statseeker

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

45th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (17th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

63rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Mark Tukh

Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies

Leverages comprehensive network monitoring and AI-driven automation for enhanced performance analysis

There is a model for network traffic analysis in the NetOps product called NetOps Flow Analyzer. It provides all the necessary protocols and analysis. DX NetOps supports network monitoring across hybrid environments, though I hope it works out of the box. The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is stable."

"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."

"A highly scalable solution."

"The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data."

"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"The AI is the best feature in this solution."

"The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices."

More DX NetOps pros

"Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is."

"The most valuable feature is the dashboard, where you have everything right there on the screen."

"The product simplifies monitoring by providing real-time alerts through a GUI dashboard, email and texts."

"The monitoring provided by this solution helps us to track down and solve issues."

"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."

"This solution has helped us to proactively identify issues and push some of those fixes down to tier one."

"The most important feature for us is the interface statistics, because our customer normally asks us for bandwidth utilization reports. Statseeker has very descriptive transmit and receive information."

"We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"One improvement that could make the product better is to streamline its modules into a more cohesive solution."

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

"It would be better if they had an NFA network analysis feature. We appreciate features like extended network security for bucket flows, but it would be better to have some IDs, IPS functionalities, DDoS, or something like that."

"The hardware requirements can be improved."

"It would be useful to have more AI features."

"The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market."

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

More DX NetOps cons

"Configuration management: In configuration management it would be helpful if it would backup configuration files (running and start-up configuration) for devices. (Not sure if this is already available in the latest version)."

"The inclusion of configuration management features and SIP links would improve this solution."

"More private MIB object support, such as WAN optimisation performance and wireless, would be helpful."

"The main issue I've seen, in the last six months to a year, is when I upgrade I seem to be hitting bugs. The upgrade won't go smoothly and I have to engage support. These things happen when you upgrade, it's not the end of the world, but from a stability point of view, the only time I've so far, is during upgrades."

"That user interface for selecting things needs to be a little more intuitive."

"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."

"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."

"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"Statseeker is pretty cheap."

"We now feel the pricing is a good value. Previously we had a just a normal license but now we've got an Enterprise license. Since the Enterprise, it's been a lot better value. We did think it was pretty expensive before, but with the Enterprise license it's almost less than half that price. If you have a number of accounts within the organization that use Statseeker, I would suggest get the Enterprise license."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

"We pay somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000 yearly in licensing fees."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

University

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DX NetOps?

It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

I think the pricing is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

We have not used the predictive analytics capability of DX NetOps in impacting our network management processes. My experience with using automated root cause analysis is that it tells the symptoms...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 21% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs DX NetOps

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs DX NetOps

Compared 10% of the time

ThousandEyes vs DX NetOps

Compared 9% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 48% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 28% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 24% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

August 2025

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

July 2025

Download Statseeker product report

Overview

DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.

Broadcom

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Statseeker

July 2025

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.