DX NetOps vs Statseeker comparison

Broadcom and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #43 with an average rating of 8.3, while Techniche is ranked #61 with an average rating of 7.0. Broadcom holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 8 DX NetOps reviews

1,202 Views
1,082 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

613 Views
546 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and DX NetOps are solutions in network performance monitoring. DX NetOps offers a more comprehensive feature set, preferred for enterprises with complex needs, while Statseeker is recognized for speed and efficiency.

Features: Statseeker offers fast, detailed analytics, minimal data retention requirements, and rapid deployment capabilities. DX NetOps includes extensive integration capabilities, advanced AI-driven insights, and broad network management functions.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker could benefit from enhanced integration features, more advanced analytics, and expanded configuration options. DX NetOps might improve in areas such as simplifying deployment processes, reducing costs, and optimizing performance for smaller environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Statseeker provides a straightforward deployment process with strong support, enabling quick setups. DX NetOps is slightly more complex to deploy but compensates with robust customer service and detailed resources.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker is favored for lower setup costs and fast ROI, providing good value for small to medium businesses. DX NetOps has higher costs but offers ROI through its robust feature set, making it suitable for enterprises seeking advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Statseeker

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,771 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

43rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (18th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

61st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
DX NetOps	0.6%
Statseeker	0.3%
Other	99.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Mark Tukh

Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies

Leverages comprehensive network monitoring and AI-driven automation for enhanced performance analysis

There is a model for network traffic analysis in the NetOps product called NetOps Flow Analyzer. It provides all the necessary protocols and analysis. DX NetOps supports network monitoring across hybrid environments, though I hope it works out of the box. The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data."

"The solution is stable."

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"The AI is the best feature in this solution."

"The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices."

"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."

"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."

"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."

More DX NetOps pros

"This solution helps in terms of troubleshooting, and you can do capacity planning with it."

"If you need a product that's able to monitor all the ports in your environment or all the ports that you want, this is a great product to use. Statseeker is quite flexible in tailoring the product, spending time tailoring the product with you. It's fairly low maintenance. It's quite quick."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the simplicity of adding new devices into it."

"The most important for us is how fast this solution is, as well as the granularity that you can get to, such as per-minute statistics."

"We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all."

"The most valuable feature is the dashboard, where you have everything right there on the screen."

"The most valuable features are scalability and reliability."

"It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

"DX NetOps is somewhat convoluted, and some of the programming constructs can be documented or driven through languages such as Python, Perl, and shell scripting, but they have their proprietary language, which may not be very user-friendly."

"It would be better if they had an NFA network analysis feature. We appreciate features like extended network security for bucket flows, but it would be better to have some IDs, IPS functionalities, DDoS, or something like that."

"One improvement that could make the product better is to streamline its modules into a more cohesive solution."

"It would be useful to have more AI features."

"The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market."

More DX NetOps cons

"If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better."

"With Statseeker I'd like to see some flow, i.e. what's tuning-up the network. The trend I like is managing the traffic load by going to the cloud."

"More private MIB object support, such as WAN optimisation performance and wireless, would be helpful."

"We haven't seen an ROI."

"This solution would be improved with better automatic discovery for ping-only devices."

"That user interface for selecting things needs to be a little more intuitive."

"Maybe they could provide a little bit more flexibility on creating custom dashboards."

"I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."

"When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."

"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Energy/Utilities Company

11%

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DX NetOps?

It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

I think the pricing is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

We have not used the predictive analytics capability of DX NetOps in impacting our network management processes. My experience with using automated root cause analysis is that it tells the symptoms...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 17% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 12% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs DX NetOps

Compared 12% of the time

ThousandEyes vs DX NetOps

Compared 9% of the time

InfoVista VistaInsight vs DX NetOps

Compared 8% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 39% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 26% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 17% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

October 2025

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

September 2025

Download Statseeker product report

Overview

DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.

Broadcom

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Statseeker

September 2025

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.