DX NetOps vs Statseeker comparison

Broadcom and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #36 with an average rating of 8.8, while Techniche is ranked #63 with an average rating of 7.0. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 10 DX NetOps reviews

1,522 Views
1,355 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

900 Views
855 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and DX NetOps are solutions in network performance monitoring. DX NetOps offers a more comprehensive feature set, preferred for enterprises with complex needs, while Statseeker is recognized for speed and efficiency.

Features: Statseeker offers fast, detailed analytics, minimal data retention requirements, and rapid deployment capabilities. DX NetOps includes extensive integration capabilities, advanced AI-driven insights, and broad network management functions.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker could benefit from enhanced integration features, more advanced analytics, and expanded configuration options. DX NetOps might improve in areas such as simplifying deployment processes, reducing costs, and optimizing performance for smaller environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Statseeker provides a straightforward deployment process with strong support, enabling quick setups. DX NetOps is slightly more complex to deploy but compensates with robust customer service and detailed resources.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker is favored for lower setup costs and fast ROI, providing good value for small to medium businesses. DX NetOps has higher costs but offers ROI through its robust feature set, making it suitable for enterprises seeking advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Statseeker

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,176 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

36th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (19th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

63rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
DX NetOps	0.7%
Statseeker	0.4%
Other	98.9%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Balabrahmam_Chakka

Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services

Has provided topological insights and dashboard-driven network visibility across complex environments

DX NetOps can be improved by expanding its integrations with different tools, as it can currently integrate with Spectrum and other Broadcom products. It would be beneficial to gain integration capabilities with tools such as New Relic or SolarWinds. Integration with DX NetOps occurs through API, which fetches metrics from those tools, and this is currently happening in our area, with DX NetOps receiving data not only from Spectrum but also from New Relic and SolarWinds. DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds. For example, Sainsbury's uses SAP cloud, SAS, and Oracle cloud, where monitoring is not currently possible through DX NetOps and Spectrum, which are limited to certain mechanisms. Within the organization, SNMP is usable, but to display metrics from outside the organization, different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices."

"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."

"The AI is the best feature in this solution."

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"Real-time insights through DX NetOps benefit diagnosing and resolving network issues since Spectrum has all sorts of details, but it lacks dashboards and a readable tabular format."

"The solution is stable."

"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."

"DX NetOps network monitoring and fault tolerance are the absolute best in the market, especially for the Indian market."

More DX NetOps pros

"If you need a product that's able to monitor all the ports in your environment or all the ports that you want, this is a great product to use. Statseeker is quite flexible in tailoring the product, spending time tailoring the product with you. It's fairly low maintenance. It's quite quick."

"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."

"Device grouping is very easy, and you can discover thousands of devices in a few minutes."

"The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us."

"The most important feature is just the fact that it doesn't aggregate the information up, and I can look at detailed information going back quite a long time."

"Whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."

"We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was."

"We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"It would be useful to have more AI features."

"The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market."

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds."

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

"The hardware requirements can be improved."

"I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10."

More DX NetOps cons

"Configuration management: In configuration management it would be helpful if it would backup configuration files (running and start-up configuration) for devices. (Not sure if this is already available in the latest version)."

"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."

"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."

"I would like to see the solution incorporate diagnosis of the workstation."

"I'd say the interface could improve a little bit. I find with new users, I tend to have to spend a bit of time walking them through how to use the interface. It could be a little more user friendly."

"I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like."

"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."

"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We pay a yearly maintenance fee of approximately $40,000 USD."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."

"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

The pricing is fair for the level of enterprise capability it provides. Proper sizing and planning during deployment helps optimise licensing and overall cost. Anyone adopting it should account for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10. I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX NetOps?

I use DX NetOps for large-scale network monitoring, fault detection, and performance analysis. My work involves evaluating how well it handles distributed environments, event correlation, and proac...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs DX NetOps

Compared 13% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX NetOps

Compared 12% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs DX NetOps

Compared 9% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 7% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 29% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 19% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 15% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker

Compared 12% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Statseeker

Compared 12% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

January 2026

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

January 2026

Download Statseeker product report

Overview

DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.

Broadcom

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Statseeker

December 2025

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.