Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dropbox Sign vs Nintex eSign comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dropbox Sign
Ranking in eSignature (Electronic Signature)
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nintex eSign
Ranking in eSignature (Electronic Signature)
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the eSignature (Electronic Signature) category, the mindshare of Dropbox Sign is 3.0%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex eSign is 1.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eSignature (Electronic Signature) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Dropbox Sign3.0%
Nintex eSign1.8%
Other95.2%
eSignature (Electronic Signature)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2785143 - PeerSpot reviewer
Founder . Interior Architect & Interior Designer at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees
Digital sharing has replaced bulky paperwork and now allows photo and document links for everyone
The best features Dropbox Sign offers include having a Dropbox account, but you can use Dropbox even if you are not signed in. That feature helps me and my team because if I upload something on Dropbox, I can send the link also to those who do not have Dropbox. This is very useful because you do not need to be subscribed to download something from the site. Dropbox Sign has positively impacted my organization because I can upload something on Dropbox without the physical paper of all my documents. This allows me to travel more lightly. Specific benefits include saving time.
Todd Blake - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior IT Specialist at COMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTIONS INC
A stable solution that provides businesses the ability to create and secure documents whenever needed
The administrative user interface used to create users and track templates and envelopes for our product is outdated. Now we're on the AssureSign side and not the Nintex side, so I don't know if they are different products. If Nintex AssureSign is one product, then they have given it an outdated feel and look. If I had more experience with other similar programs, like DocuSign, that I used years ago, I might have been able to give more concrete or better feedback on what additional features are to be included in the tool.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Dropbox Sign is the performance and the user experience is excellent."
"The solution is good."
"Dropbox Sign has positively impacted my organization because I can upload something on Dropbox without the physical paper of all my documents."
"For those signing, it is free to use."
"It's very easy to run through the document and get it signed since it walks you through everything in a step-by-step manner. So, it's very easy to use."
"The solution has significantly simplified the process of getting contracts signed."
"The pricing is typically for what is in the market."
"Dropbox Sign positively impacts my organization because it makes my work easy."
"I rate the technical support a ten out of ten because they really help us."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
 

Cons

"It is complicated to sign the documents directly on the screen."
"They should ensure that every company can accept it. I'm not sure if all companies use it."
"Currently, one can't accept payments over the solution."
"Dropbox Sign can be improved because with some types of connection, I cannot use Dropbox."
"Dropbox Sign uses a combination of encryption, including classic encryption. The encryption overall could improve."
"We do not have any unique use cases and do not need any other features."
"The tool needs to be able to integrate with other products or servers."
"Currently, merge mapping can only be done within a specific object. If we want to do a merge mapping for related objects, we need to create a lot of automation."
"The solution's initial setup process was a bit complex…The administrative user interface used to create users and track templates and envelopes for our product is outdated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most comfortable pricing, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"The solution's pricing is fine. I chose Dropbox Sign over Adobe because of its pricing."
"AssureSign offers comfortable prices that are more affordable for clients. This is why many clients are attracted to AssureSign, as it is a cost-effective tool."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eSignature (Electronic Signature) solutions are best for your needs.
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise3
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dropbox Sign?
I have had no experience with pricing, setup cost, or licensing.
What needs improvement with Dropbox Sign?
I cannot think of any improvements for Dropbox Sign at this time.
What is your primary use case for Dropbox Sign?
My main use case for Dropbox Sign is sharing folders and files with other people. I used Dropbox Sign in a recent situation at work when I had to share some PPT or code and we could not use the cli...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

HelloSign
Nintex AssureSign
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox Sign vs. Nintex eSign and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.