DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs Logz.io comparison

Read 8 Logz.io reviews

1,163 Views
815 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

DNIF HYPERCLOUD

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

DNIF HYPERCLOUD and Logz.io offer competitive solutions in log management and analysis. Users prefer the advanced features of Logz.io but are more satisfied with the pricing and customer support of DNIF HYPERCLOUD.

Features: DNIF HYPERCLOUD is praised for its scalability, ability to handle large data volumes effectively. Logz.io receives positive feedback for its integration capabilities, customizable dashboards. Users find Logz.io more feature-rich, giving it the edge in functionality.

Room for Improvement: DNIF HYPERCLOUD users highlight the need for better documentation, more training resources. Logz.io users point out occasional latency issues, a desire for enhanced alerting features. DNIF HYPERCLOUD needs to address more fundamental support issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DNIF HYPERCLOUD is reported to have a straightforward deployment process, excellent customer service. Logz.io offers an easy deployment, has mixed reviews on customer service efficiency. DNIF HYPERCLOUD shows a better balance between deployment ease and support quality.

Pricing and ROI: DNIF HYPERCLOUD is considered cost-effective with a favorable ROI. Logz.io, while seen as more expensive, is deemed worth the investment due to its advanced features. Pricing satisfaction leans towards DNIF HYPERCLOUD, but ROI perceptions are slightly more favorable for Logz.io.

To learn more, read our detailed DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Logz.io Report (Updated: September 2024).

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Logz.io

Download the complete report

Helped 805,335 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

DNIF HYPERCLOUD

Ranking in Log Management

22nd

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

25th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (12th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (13th)

Logz.io

Ranking in Log Management

23rd

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of DNIF HYPERCLOUD is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logz.io is 0.4%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2049774

Assistant Manager (information Security) at Tata Projects Limited

Dec 8, 2022

Good monitoring and reporting with helpful dashboards

DNIF HYPERCLOUD is providing solutions as per incidents based on risks, incident type, and priority. It enables analysts to filter and prioritize based on risk scores and business impact. Its feature set enables the organization to improve security further. Categories are user-friendly and easy to understand. The reports are formed in such categories that make it easy to act while saving time. DNIF HYPERCLOUD is useful in maintaining service level agreements, or SLAs. The reports can be formatted as needed with all mandatory columns. The dashboard is helpful, and it creates visualizations to let staff review event data and identify patterns and anomalies.

Read full review

Derrick Brockel

Senior Manager of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Dec 12, 2023

The solution is a consistent logging platform that provides excellent query mechanisms

We can query a lot of data points and build dashboards. The vendor is good at adjusting their models. Most companies want us to forecast our yearly use and pay it upfront on day one. With Logz.io, we commit to use 14 TB in a year. However, they measure us every month and give us a monthly bill. Depending on our monthly usage, we pay for 14 TB divided by 12 months or a little extra. It's a little bit more like AWS. Other solutions do not do it. They want their money upfront. We really like the dashboards. We have 36 sub-accounts. Each sub-account is an app, and we could put restrictions on that app. Previously, there were capacity restrictions on the sub-accounts. If we have a sub-account of 1 TB and use only 100 GB, we waste 900 GB that day. We could not share it between sub-accounts. Now, they provide an overhead volume. We do a reserve, and any sub-account could use anything over the reserve. It utilizes our footprint better.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The User Behavior Analytics is a built-in threat-hunting feature. It detects and reports on any kind of malware or ransomware that enters the network."

"The beauty of the solution is that you can develop infrastructure for a data lake using open sources that are separate from the licenses."

"The response time on queries is super-fast."

"The solution is quite stable and offers good performance. It also works on a virtual machine. We haven't found any issues with it so far. It's been reliable."

"I like the MITRE table, a feature I saw for the first time in the same solution. There was one MITRE tactic table, which can be used to identify threats if you have all kinds of rules enabled or if you have rules for all the tactics in the MITRE table. There are 14 tables in MITRE, and those 14 tables consist of multiple columns, tactics, and techniques. It was one of the first SIEM tools I saw that had that particular MITRE table. On that basis, you can create new rules and identify existing ones. At any point, if an alert is triggered, it will try to match it to any of those MITRE tactics. I liked that creating a workbook on MITRE business was straightforward. I also like that you can search using SQL or DQL."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of EPS it can handle."

"Great for scaling productivity for log monitoring purposes."

"The dashboard is helpful, and it creates visualizations to let staff review event data and identify patterns and anomalies."

More DNIF HYPERCLOUD pros

"InsightOne is the main reason why we use LogMeIn. This is mostly because of log data that we are pushing tools and logs in general."

"We use the product for log collection and monitoring."

"The tool is simple to setup where it is just plug and play. The tool is reliable and we never had any performance issues."

"It is massively useful and great for testing. We can just go, find logs, and attach them easily. It has a very quick lookup. Whereas, before we would have to go, dig around, and find the server that the logs were connected to, then go to the server, download the log, and attach it. Now, we can just go straight to this solution, type in the log ID and server ID, and obtain the information that we want."

"The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable."

"The visualizations in Kibana are the most valuable feature. It's much more convenient to have a visualization of logs. We can see status really clearly and very fast, with just a couple of clicks."

"We use the tool to track the dev and production environment."

"The other nice thing about Logz.io is their team. When it comes to onboarding, their support is incredibly proactive. They bring the brand experience from a customer services perspective because their team is always there to help you refine filters and tweak dashboards. That is really a useful thing to have. Their engagement is really supportive."

Cons

"The vendor is fairly new and it's not as big as some of the international competitors. It's not a mature product. If you ask them to move data, it might take a lot of time."

"I think DNIF HYPERCLOUD can implement the ability to export more than 100,000. At the moment, we can't go beyond that. So many times, if you're checking for the firewall logs and working on something related to authentication or network-related traffic, while that log count is low, the account goes beyond that. You can't restrict the logs or the amount of data you can export. It's very important for my situation. It would be better if they could increase the capacity of exports. Although there are many more types of searching in DNIF HYPERCLOUD, people still struggle to query out what they want because not everyone is good at SQL or DQL. The easiest way to query out in DNIF is using the GUI-based interface. But in the GUI interface, you can use operator calls. It gets tricky when you want to search for a specific type of event. You don't know where it will be passed and whether it will be consistent. In the initial phase, it's tough for us to use DNIF. You cannot pass every event in a stable DNIF. When we used that particular tool, we used to get those logs, but sometimes many things are not getting passed. So, we used to export the sheet or export the data into Excel and weigh the required details. In the next release, I would like them to improve the export of the columns and make the application more user-friendly. I would also like a threat-hunting feature in the next release."

"Dependency on the DNIF support team was frustrating."

"The solution should be able to connect to endpoints, such as desktops and laptops... If this solution had a smart connector to these logs- Windows, Linux, or any other logs - without affecting the performance of the connector, that would be wonderful."

"The solution's command line should be simpler so that routine commands can be used."

"The EBA could be improved."

"There are currently some issues with machine learning plug-ins."

"I feel that DNIF needs to invest more in marketing, considering that it operates at a very competitive speed."

"I would like them to improve how they manage releases. Some of our integrations integrate specifically with set versions. Logz.io occasionally releases an update that might break that integration. On one occasion, we found out a little bit too late, then we had to roll it back."

"The price can be cheaper and they should have better monitoring."

"The solution needs to expand its access control and make it accessible through API."

"The product needs improvement from a filtering perspective."

"Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle."

"When it comes to reducing our troubleshooting time, it depends. When there are no bugs in Logz.io, it reduces troubleshooting by 5 to 10 percent. When there are bugs, it increases our troubleshooting time by 200 percent or more."

"The solution needs to improve its data retention. It should be greater than seven days. The product needs to improve its documentation as well."

"I would like granularity on alerting so we can get tentative alerts and major alerts, then break it down between the two."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price-wise, the product is quite economical. I rate the solution's price as three or four on a scale of one to ten, where one is considered to be a very economically priced tool."

"The pricing is based on the log size."

"The solution requires a huge infrastructure and that is costly."

"You pay for what you need, and that is a good model. They are also quite happy to talk to you about your uses and your use case. They will even go as far as suggesting things that you don't need to do in order to save you money. At one point, I was quite surprised at how cheap it could be if we wanted it to be or how much they would help us manage our costs."

"The product is a little expensive."

"The product's pricing is cheaper than other solutions."

"At the time it was set up, we thought Logz.io was very reasonable for what we were getting in terms of how much time and hosting costs it was saving us, because you don't have to run the servers for it anymore."

"The tool is an open source product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

15%

Healthcare Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DNIF HYPERCLOUD?

The dashboard is helpful, and it creates visualizations to let staff review event data and identify patterns and anomalies.

What needs improvement with DNIF HYPERCLOUD?

A lot of people don't know about DNIF HYPERCLOUD, but they do know about products like Splunk, QRadar, ArcSight, and some other SIEM solutions. DNIF is not a known name in the market. From an impro...

What is your primary use case for DNIF HYPERCLOUD?

DNIF HYPERCLOUD is a good SIEM solution. One of the tools' features is very high scalability in terms of the events generated per second. The product is aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework....

What do you like most about Logz.io?

The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Logz.io?

The product is a little expensive. We're pushing 17 TB. It costs us one and a half million dollars a year.

What needs improvement with Logz.io?

Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle. The product must add some AI capabilities to learn from previous behaviors. Instead of us setting thresholds, the tool should learn the thresh...

IBM Security QRadar vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD

Comparisons

Compared 42% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD

Compared 33% of the time

Rapid7 InsightOps vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD

Compared 25% of the time

More DNIF HYPERCLOUD Competitors

Datadog vs Logz.io

Compared 37% of the time

Coralogix vs Logz.io

Compared 17% of the time

Wazuh vs Logz.io

Compared 14% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Logz.io

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Logz.io

Compared 8% of the time

More Logz.io Competitors

Product Reports

DNIF HYPERCLOUD

Download DNIF HYPERCLOUD product report

Download Logz.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Logz

Learn More

NETMONASTERY

Overview

DNIF HYPERCLOUD is a cloud native platform that brings the functionality of SIEM, UEBA and SOAR into a single continuous workflow to solve cybersecurity challenges at scale. DNIF HYPERCLOUD is the flagship SaaS platform from NETMONASTERY that delivers key detection functionality using big data analytics and machine learning. NETMONASTERY aims to deliver a platform that helps customers in ingesting machine data and automatically identify anomalies in these data streams using machine learning and outlier detection algorithms. The objective is to make it easy for untrained engineers and analysts to use the platform and extract benefit reliably and efficiently.

Logz.io is a leading cloud-native observability platform that enables engineers to use the best open source tools in the market without the complexity of operating, managing, and scaling them. Logz.io offers four products: Log Management built on ELK, Infrastructure Monitoring based on Prometheus, Distributed Tracing based on Jaeger, and an ELK-based Cloud SIEM. These are offered as fully managed, integrated cloud services designed to help engineers monitor, troubleshoot and secure their distributed cloud workloads more effectively. Engineering driven companies like Siemens, Unity and ZipRecruiter use Logz.io to simplify monitoring and security workflows, increasing developer productivity, reducing time to resolve issues, and increasing the performance and security of their mission-critical applications.

Sample Customers

Mahindra & Mahindra, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), ICICI Bank, Yes Bank, Tata Motors, RBL Bank

Dish Network, The Economist, Forbes, Holler, Kenshoo, OneSpan, Siemens, Sisense, Unity, ZipRecruiter

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Logz.io