Digital Guardian vs ZENworks Suite comparison

Fortra and OpenText are both solutions in the Endpoint Encryption category. Fortra is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.8, while OpenText is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0. Fortra holds a 0.9% mindshare in EE, compared to OpenText’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Digital Guardian

Read 11 Digital Guardian reviews

149 Views
106 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

ZENworks Suite

Read 2 ZENworks Suite reviews

315 Views
147 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Digital Guardian

ZENworks Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

ZENworks Suite and Digital Guardian are competing in the enterprise software market, focusing on endpoint management and data protection, respectively. Digital Guardian is favored for its advanced data protection features, worthwhile for the extra cost, whereas ZENworks Suite is noted for its competitive pricing and support.

Features: ZENworks Suite offers endpoint management with patch management, asset inventory, and configuration management. Digital Guardian focuses on data loss prevention, encryption, and threat detection, suitable for industries with strict data protection needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ZENworks Suite ensures straightforward deployment with significant integration and setup support, while Digital Guardian has a more complex deployment due to its comprehensive security measures, aligning well with high compliance standards. ZENworks Suite's customer service is commended for effective support, whereas Digital Guardian provides in-depth technical assistance specifically geared towards security needs.

Pricing and ROI: ZENworks Suite is characterized by a lower setup cost, offering strong ROI with cost-effective endpoint management solutions. Digital Guardian, requiring a higher initial investment, delivers considerable ROI through its advanced data protection and compliance benefits, making it a valuable option for organizations prioritizing data security.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital Guardian vs. ZENworks Suite Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian vs. ZENworks Suite

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital Guardian

Ranking in Endpoint Encryption

9th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (11th), Mobile Data Protection (7th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (23rd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (41st)

ZENworks Suite

Ranking in Endpoint Encryption

8th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Encryption category, the mindshare of Digital Guardian is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ZENworks Suite is 1.4%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Encryption

Featured Reviews

Sandeep Jopat

Cyber Security Researcher at a engineering company with 10,001+ employees

Highly customizable, helpful support, and multiple modules available

Digital Guardian is generally considered stable, with its robust data loss prevention capabilities being highly valued by organizations. However, as with any complex software solution, there may be occasional challenges in terms of compatibility with certain operating systems or applications. In such cases, it may be necessary to modify settings or entries within Digital Guardian to ensure optimal performance. Overall, Digital Guardian is a stable solution that can be highly customized to meet the specific needs and requirements of organizations. As with any software solution, regular maintenance and support from a team of experts is necessary to ensure optimal performance and stability.

Read full review

reviewer1173039

network engineer at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees

Greta for remote control and management with good performance

I'm not on the most current version, however, I know one area that I didn't get into that I kind of wanted to is to have a mobile device management tool. My understanding is it's improved a lot from the version I have. It may be a feature that is already available. Other than that, it really does everything I need it to do, and don't have any complaints.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have been able to monitor access to files from each of our workstations."

"In Digital Guardian, they have the cloud correlation servers that give you visibility work like EBR and the correlation server works very well for security analysis."

"The technical support is really terrific."

"I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection."

"It can scale from 100 to 10,000. There's no problem with the scalability."

"It has been scalable."

"It has the added advantage of offering forensic analysis."

"Some of the features that are highly appreciated are its robust data loss prevention capabilities, flexible deployment options, and the ability to monitor data transfer across multiple vectors."

More Digital Guardian pros

"The stability is good."

"The setup is pretty straightforward."

Cons

"I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated."

"If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility."

"The solution has complexities around policy creation and deployment."

"Digital Guardian is an excellent solution but our experience with the partner has been the most horrible experience we have ever had with any partner."

"Some features on Mac and Linux are not complete currently. For example, some device control features haven't been transferred over to the other systems. If they could have their Windows features also available on Mac and Linux, that would be perfect. Some of our customers have a Mac environment for their RD environment. Having the solution fully capable of handling everything in a Mac environment is crucial."

"It would be helpful if there was an on-premise version of the solution for companies that cannot use the cloud, such as government sectors."

"The initial setup is a bit more complex than other solutions."

"The room for improvement with Digital Guardian is that it will be better with the Linux agent because it is the only DLP solution for Linux workstations. It still needs to upgrade the agents to the latest version for the Linux kernel."

More Digital Guardian cons

"I'm not on the most current version, however, I know one area that I didn't get into that I kind of wanted to is to have a mobile device management tool. My understanding is it's improved a lot from the version I have. It may be a feature that is already available."

"If they could introduce it on the cloud, it would be ideal."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If I compare Digital Guardian with Symantec, the license cost is lower, but McAfee can be cheaper than Digital Guardian. It depends on how many licenses you plan to buy and how big the project is. The cost is not so high as Symantec, but not as cheap as McAfee. They can easily sell the solution for price."

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten because Digital Guardian is expensive."

"The price of Digital Guardian is on the higher end compared to other vendors."

"The price of Digital Guardian is expensive."

"Digital Guardian has both, subscription and perpetual licenses, but I think when everything (all technologies) will go to the cloud they will only offer subscriptions."

"The cost was around $300,000."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Government

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Digital Guardian?

I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital Guardian?

Technical support is included in the subscription package. But if, during the subscription, our clients want to include the professional services of a Digital Guardian engineer, the price changes. ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital Guardian?

If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Digital Guardian

Compared 8% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Digital Guardian

Compared 6% of the time

Safetica ONE vs Digital Guardian

Compared 5% of the time

More Digital Guardian Competitors

Microsoft BitLocker vs ZENworks Suite

Compared 100% of the time

More ZENworks Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian

April 2025

Download Digital Guardian product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Encryption

March 2025

Download ZENworks Suite product report

Also Known As

No data available

ZENworks

Overview

Digital Guardian is proud to be part of Fortra’s comprehensive cybersecurity portfolio, and one of the Data Protection family of products. Fortra simplifies today’s complex cybersecurity landscape by bringing complementary products together to solve problems in innovative ways. These integrated, scalable solutions address the fast-changing challenges you face in safeguarding your organization. With the help of the powerful protection from Digital Guardian and others, Fortra is your relentless ally, here for you every step of the way throughout your cybersecurity journey.

Fortra

ZENworks Full Disk Encryption (formerly Novell ZENworks Full Disk Encryption) reduces the cost of deploying, managing, and troubleshooting encrypted laptops and desktops. It has automated data protection that locks out threats. It manages encrypted devices remotely and cut travel costs. Avoids security breaches and stay out of the news and gives IT staff a familiar management environment.

OpenText

Sample Customers

The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil Circuit

CSC

Buyer's Guide

Digital Guardian vs. ZENworks Suite

April 2025

Free Report: Digital Guardian vs. ZENworks Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital Guardian vs. ZENworks Suite and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital Guardian vs. ZENworks Suite report.

See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.