Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs Trellix ESM comparison

Netwrix and Trellix are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Netwrix is ranked #62, while Trellix is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.4. Netwrix holds a 0.3% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Trellix’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Netwrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise
Read 4 NNT Log Tracker Enterprise reviews
  • 444 Views
  • 355 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Trellix ESM
Read 38 Trellix ESM reviews
  • 1,573 Views
  • 1,431 Comparison Views
76% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Trellix ESM and NNT Log Tracker Enterprise compete in the enterprise security and monitoring category. Trellix ESM has the edge in customer support and ease of deployment, while NNT Log Tracker Enterprise offers more robust features.

Features: Trellix ESM users benefit from comprehensive monitoring tools, customization options, and efficient threat identification. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise offers detailed logging capabilities, advanced threat detection, and a superior feature set.

Room for Improvement: Trellix ESM needs better documentation, more intuitive setup, and improved user interface. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise could improve its update mechanism, reporting tools, and performance speed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix ESM is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise, though noted for initial setup complexity, benefits from thorough customer support. Trellix ESM has a slight edge in deployment ease, but both provide strong customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix ESM is seen as more cost-effective with a higher ROI due to its lower setup costs and quicker deployment. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise, while more expensive, is considered worth the price for its advanced capabilities. Trellix ESM offers better immediate ROI, but NNT Log Tracker Enterprise justifies its price with superior features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs. Trellix ESM Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs. Trellix ESM
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
62nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (62nd)
Trellix ESM
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
17th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix ESM is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Trellix ESM1.1%
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise0.3%
Other98.6%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

JT
Great for PCI compliance but issues with stability and large amounts of data
I mainly use this solution to meet PCI compliance The automation of compliance reports and the correlation of the log have been major improvements.  The most valuable feature is the predefined reports for PCI compliance. The correlation suite needs to be improved. I also think they need to…
Read full review
Daniel Durian - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to monitor and detect cyberattacks
The tool's effectiveness depends on how you define your log sources. To build visibility of incoming and outgoing traffic, you need logs from perimeter defense, firewalls, web application firewalls, and endpoint protection. With good traffic visibility, incident response time is really quick. Trellix ESM provides situation awareness. On the dashboard, I can see outbound and inbound communications to known threat hosts, IPS/IDS activity, and threat intelligence of the perimeter defense in the firewall. This information helps preempt attacks.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the predefined reports for PCI compliance."
"File integrity monitoring is a very important function."
"The FIM features in the Change Tracker and the Log Tracker are the most valuable."
"This is a very easy-to-use interface with a quick ramp-up time."
"Scalability is quite easier with Trellix ESM, because all we need to do is add more receivers to it, so it can go to any point."
"The solution is 100% stable. We really have had a great time working with it. It hasn't let us down."
"Trellix ESM utilizes fewer human resources and improves security and visibility."
"It is user-friendly. The notification part of McAfee ESM is very easy."
"The most valuable features of McAfee ESM are intrusion detection, malware protection, and the device controller."
"The tool's effectiveness depends on how you define your log sources. To build visibility of incoming and outgoing traffic, you need logs from perimeter defense, firewalls, web application firewalls, and endpoint protection. With good traffic visibility, incident response time is really quick."
"Trellix ESM is very user-friendly."
"The support I have received from the vendor has been great."
More Trellix ESM pros
 

Cons

"The correlation suite needs to be improved."
"Only one minor deployment issue came up and it was resolved quickly. No other areas of improvement come to mind yet."
"I would like to see the integration of AI technology, so rather than manually monitoring the logs, the tool will understand it and take care of it."
"It is able to identify the vulnerability, however, they need an option to auto-mitigate."
"Cloud integration has room for improvement because they're not full-fledged to integrate with the cloud solutions that come. They use different integration platforms to bring in data, and that needs to be improved."
"Tech support is required each time there is a system update of the solution."
"The product’s alert response feature needs improvement. It could be more flexible and secure."
"The only issue I have with McAfee is the amount of computer resources that it takes... it's definitely impacting some of the other applications that are running on a computer at the same time."
"Update to user interface from version 9 is cosmetic in some aspects, and after a few clicks you are back on the old interface."
"McAfee is no more providing security updates on this product, and the enhancements to this product seem to have stopped. Moreover, we don't get proper support, and we struggle to get its support. It would be good if they can add some AI engine and out of the box use cases because it is currently limited to the same scenario and the same setup. I have done a POC for Securonix, LogRhythm. These products are much more ahead as compared to McAfee ESM. They have included multiple modules in the same solution. Correlation is very easy. If McAfee ESM can improve, especially in such implementations, then I believe it would be much better."
"It is not a very advanced solution, and it is for very generic use cases. It cannot cope with the advanced requirements that we're going to have. For example, for multiple authentication failures, it is still based on Windows events for detecting multiple login failures, whereas other companies are going beyond and working on implementing two-factor authentication. It is time to correlate the two-factor authentication results with authentification failures, which is not happening with McAfee ESM. The performance of the tool should be improved because it is very slow. The data display on the console is very slow in McAfee ESM. Its data storage is still old-fashioned, and it should be improved and upgraded to the latest versions. They have to come up with some new ideas to match what other leaders in the same domain are doing. For example, in Splunk, when you search for information for the last 60 days or five months, it quickly shows the information, but that is not the case with McAfee. The results should be quicker and faster on the console. They should integrate some additional features such as User Behavior Analytics (UBA) and automation. The threat intelligence part should also be improved on McAfee."
"The support from McAfee ESM could improve. They could improve the speed."
More Trellix ESM cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"NNT's pricing is moderate - I would rate their pricing two-and-a-half out of ten."
"We have selected a perpetual license along with support."
"Consider both their on-premises solution and their hosted solution. Both are reasonably priced."
"We pay for our licensing fees on a yearly basis, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"The cost is all included. The finance department handles the financial part, and we mostly don't get involved in it."
"Regarding pricing, Trellix ESM is not that expensive. It's less than half the cost of IBM QRadar."
"When compared to IBM Security QRadar and other similar platforms, the pricing of McAfee ESM is reasonable and comparatively less expensive."
"McAfee is the right choice for a low-budget solution."
"It is an inexpensive product. We purchase its yearly license."
"The cost is dependent on the customer's environment and requirements."
"The price is good. It's moderate. We follow a pay-as-you-go model. There are different models available, and they can also be monthly. You can choose monthly or yearly. It's very flexible. If our existing customers exceed the current plan, you can just call McAfee and get it extended."
More Trellix ESM pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Feb 26, 2015
HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. ​McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm
We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise24
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about McAfee ESM?
The solution's technical support is great.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee ESM?
When discussing Trellix ESM pricing and licensing, if you consider some premium product, the pricing also has to be premium, however, enterprise customers who look for a premium product, alongside ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with McAfee ESM?
Areas of Trellix ESM that could be improved or enhanced include checking on the clients who are still on-prem, especially banks, as most are not moving everything to the cloud due to confidentialit...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs Trellix ESM Logo
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs Trellix ESM
Compared 26% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Trellix ESM Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Trellix ESM
Compared 16% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs Trellix ESM Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Trellix ESM
Compared 15% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix ESM Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix ESM
Compared 13% of the time
LogRhythm SIEM vs Trellix ESM Logo
LogRhythm SIEM vs Trellix ESM
Compared 10% of the time
More Trellix ESM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Log Management
October 2025
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise reportDownload NNT Log Tracker Enterprise product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix ESM
September 2025
Trellix ESM reportDownload Trellix ESM product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee ESM, NitroSecurity, McAfee Enterprise Security Manager
 

Overview

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is a comprehensive and easy-to-use Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution for any compliance mandate providing:

  • Enterprise-class SIEM capabilities.
  • Compliance Automation.
  • User and System Activity Audit trails.
  • Network Anomaly forensics.
  • Proactive Threat Detection.
Netwrix

Make your organization more resilient and confident with Trellix Security Operations. Filter out the noise and cut complexity to deliver faster, more effective SecOps. Integrate your existing security tools and connect with over 650 Trellix solutions and third-party products.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Wonga, WHSmith
San Francisco Police Credit Union, Wªstenrot Gruppe, Volusion, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Government of New Brunswick, State of Colorado, Macquarie Telecom, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Cologne Bonn Airport
Buyer's Guide
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs. Trellix ESM
September 2025
Free Report: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs. Trellix ESM
Find out what your peers are saying about NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs. Trellix ESM and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs. Trellix ESM report.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.