Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs Trellix ESM comparison

Netwrix and Trellix are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Netwrix is ranked #62, while Trellix is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0. Netwrix holds a 0.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Trellix’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Netwrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise
Read 4 NNT Log Tracker Enterprise reviews
  • 215 Views
  • 89 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Trellix ESM
Read 37 Trellix ESM reviews
  • 1,801 Views
  • 742 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Trellix ESM and NNT Log Tracker Enterprise compete in the enterprise security and monitoring category. Trellix ESM has the edge in customer support and ease of deployment, while NNT Log Tracker Enterprise offers more robust features.

Features: Trellix ESM users benefit from comprehensive monitoring tools, customization options, and efficient threat identification. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise offers detailed logging capabilities, advanced threat detection, and a superior feature set.

Room for Improvement: Trellix ESM needs better documentation, more intuitive setup, and improved user interface. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise could improve its update mechanism, reporting tools, and performance speed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix ESM is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise, though noted for initial setup complexity, benefits from thorough customer support. Trellix ESM has a slight edge in deployment ease, but both provide strong customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix ESM is seen as more cost-effective with a higher ROI due to its lower setup costs and quicker deployment. NNT Log Tracker Enterprise, while more expensive, is considered worth the price for its advanced capabilities. Trellix ESM offers better immediate ROI, but NNT Log Tracker Enterprise justifies its price with superior features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs. Trellix ESM Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs. Trellix ESM
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
62nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (67th)
Trellix ESM
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
19th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix ESM is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

JT
Great for PCI compliance but issues with stability and large amounts of data
I mainly use this solution to meet PCI compliance The automation of compliance reports and the correlation of the log have been major improvements.  The most valuable feature is the predefined reports for PCI compliance. The correlation suite needs to be improved. I also think they need to…
Read full review
Daniel Durian - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to monitor and detect cyberattacks
The tool's effectiveness depends on how you define your log sources. To build visibility of incoming and outgoing traffic, you need logs from perimeter defense, firewalls, web application firewalls, and endpoint protection. With good traffic visibility, incident response time is really quick. Trellix ESM provides situation awareness. On the dashboard, I can see outbound and inbound communications to known threat hosts, IPS/IDS activity, and threat intelligence of the perimeter defense in the firewall. This information helps preempt attacks.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This is a very easy-to-use interface with a quick ramp-up time."
"The FIM features in the Change Tracker and the Log Tracker are the most valuable."
"File integrity monitoring is a very important function."
"The most valuable feature is the predefined reports for PCI compliance."
"The most valuable feature for us is that it comes with many correlations, reports, and dashboards already available. It's also very easy to use."
"We are now able to completely monitor our environment so we can review what is there, which is a big win for us."
"The ease of use is the most valuable feature. Over the years I have always been using this solution and have become comfortable with it."
"The most valuable features of McAfee ESM are intrusion detection, malware protection, and the device controller."
"The most valuable feature is that if the scanning does find something, it quarantines it. Then you can decide what you are going to do with it."
"The most valuable feature is the capability to correlate different events from different platforms that we feed into it."
"It blocks the things which are not to be allowed. It has an adaptive mode where it learns for itself."
"It enables us to detect malicious threats, issues, or vulnerabilities in our network."
More Trellix ESM pros
 

Cons

"It is able to identify the vulnerability, however, they need an option to auto-mitigate."
"Only one minor deployment issue came up and it was resolved quickly. No other areas of improvement come to mind yet."
"The correlation suite needs to be improved."
"I would like to see the integration of AI technology, so rather than manually monitoring the logs, the tool will understand it and take care of it."
"McAfee is no more providing security updates on this product, and the enhancements to this product seem to have stopped. Moreover, we don't get proper support, and we struggle to get its support. It would be good if they can add some AI engine and out of the box use cases because it is currently limited to the same scenario and the same setup. I have done a POC for Securonix, LogRhythm. These products are much more ahead as compared to McAfee ESM. They have included multiple modules in the same solution. Correlation is very easy. If McAfee ESM can improve, especially in such implementations, then I believe it would be much better."
"It is not a very advanced solution, and it is for very generic use cases. It cannot cope with the advanced requirements that we're going to have. For example, for multiple authentication failures, it is still based on Windows events for detecting multiple login failures, whereas other companies are going beyond and working on implementing two-factor authentication. It is time to correlate the two-factor authentication results with authentification failures, which is not happening with McAfee ESM. The performance of the tool should be improved because it is very slow. The data display on the console is very slow in McAfee ESM. Its data storage is still old-fashioned, and it should be improved and upgraded to the latest versions. They have to come up with some new ideas to match what other leaders in the same domain are doing. For example, in Splunk, when you search for information for the last 60 days or five months, it quickly shows the information, but that is not the case with McAfee. The results should be quicker and faster on the console. They should integrate some additional features such as User Behavior Analytics (UBA) and automation. The threat intelligence part should also be improved on McAfee."
"Customized reports and alerting functionality could be included in the dashboard."
"Tech support is required each time there is a system update of the solution."
"Product currently requires Flash."
"The product’s alert response feature needs improvement. It could be more flexible and secure."
"Update to user interface from version 9 is cosmetic in some aspects, and after a few clicks you are back on the old interface."
"The solution needs to improve case management. The UI is confusing."
More Trellix ESM cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have selected a perpetual license along with support."
"NNT's pricing is moderate - I would rate their pricing two-and-a-half out of ten."
"Consider both their on-premises solution and their hosted solution. Both are reasonably priced."
"McAfee is the right choice for a low-budget solution."
"The cost is dependent on the customer's environment and requirements."
"The licensing cost is based on EPS."
"The price of McAfee ESM is higher than some of the other solutions. There are additional features that can be added at an additional fee."
"When compared to IBM Security QRadar and other similar platforms, the pricing of McAfee ESM is reasonable and comparatively less expensive."
"You should buy the distributed option instead of the all-in-one for environments with more than 1000 end points."
"The pricing is good, and they are competitive compared to providers such as RSA and IBM QRadar."
"The cost is all included. The finance department handles the financial part, and we mostly don't get involved in it."
More Trellix ESM pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Feb 26, 2015
HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. ​McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm
We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
47%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about McAfee ESM?
The solution's technical support is great.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee ESM?
When discussing Trellix ESM pricing and licensing, if you consider some premium product, the pricing also has to be premium, however, enterprise customers who look for a premium product, alongside ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with McAfee ESM?
We need to improve Trellix ESM by making sure that most of the logging devices available in the global market should be covered, and if there is any device which is not covered, there should not be...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs Trellix ESM Logo
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs Trellix ESM
Compared 28% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Trellix ESM Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Trellix ESM
Compared 15% of the time
LogRhythm SIEM vs Trellix ESM Logo
LogRhythm SIEM vs Trellix ESM
Compared 15% of the time
Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Trellix ESM Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Trellix ESM
Compared 10% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix ESM Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix ESM
Compared 10% of the time
More Trellix ESM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Log Management
May 2025
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise reportDownload NNT Log Tracker Enterprise product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix ESM
May 2025
Trellix ESM reportDownload Trellix ESM product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee ESM, NitroSecurity, McAfee Enterprise Security Manager
 

Overview

NNT Log Tracker Enterprise is a comprehensive and easy-to-use Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution for any compliance mandate providing:

  • Enterprise-class SIEM capabilities.
  • Compliance Automation.
  • User and System Activity Audit trails.
  • Network Anomaly forensics.
  • Proactive Threat Detection.
Netwrix

Make your organization more resilient and confident with Trellix Security Operations. Filter out the noise and cut complexity to deliver faster, more effective SecOps. Integrate your existing security tools and connect with over 650 Trellix solutions and third-party products.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Wonga, WHSmith
San Francisco Police Credit Union, Wªstenrot Gruppe, Volusion, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Government of New Brunswick, State of Colorado, Macquarie Telecom, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Cologne Bonn Airport
Buyer's Guide
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs. Trellix ESM
June 2025
Free Report: NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs. Trellix ESM
Find out what your peers are saying about NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs. Trellix ESM and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs. Trellix ESM report.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.