No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Dell PowerFlex vs NetApp HCI [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell PowerFlex
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
HCI (5th)
NetApp HCI [EOL]
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.6
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Aqib Butt - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Solution Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Dell PowerFlex is a high-performance, software-defined infrastructure platform designed for mission-critical workloads. It combines compute and software-defined storage in a flexible, scalable arch.
Independent Scaling of Compute and Storage PowerFlex allows us to scale compute and storage resources independently. This disaggregated architecture is extremely valuable for optimizing costs and right-sizing infrastructure based on workload demands particularly in environments with variable AI and database workloads. High Performance with Low Latency With support for NVMe, RDMA and a fully distributed architecture, PowerFlex delivers consistent low-latency performance. This is critical for applications like AI model training, real-time analytics and Tier-1 transactional databases. Flexible Deployment Options The ability to deploy PowerFlex in hyper-converged (HCI), two-layer or mixed architectures provides design flexibility for different customer needs. Whether they're building a private cloud, extending hybrid cloud capabilities or deploying in a DR configuration. Automation via PowerFlex Manager PowerFlex Manager simplifies complex operations such as provisioning, lifecycle management and policy enforcement. This helps reduce operational overhead and improves IT agility. Resiliency and Self-Healing Architecture The platform offers zero-impact rebuilds and built-in fault tolerance across nodes and disks, making it extremely reliable for business-critical workloads. Integration with AI and Kubernetes Ecosystems With support for CSI drivers and GPU-enabled infrastructure, PowerFlex fits seamlessly into modern DevOps and AI/ML pipelines allowing us to serve next-gen workloads without needing separate infrastructure stacks.
MB
Chief Information Officer at Lucart S.p.A.
Crashed continuously, complex to deploy, and bad after-sales support - NETAPP FIXED the problems in 2022
Their after-sales support, SLA, and third-parties availability should be improved. NetApp's support is very difficult to engage. We have an SLA of onsite support within 24 hours. but they don't respect the SLA. Its stability was very bad. It has been crashing continuously. In one year, we got three crashes, which is unbelievable for an appliance that is guaranteed for 10 years without any crashes. In 2022, NetApp Italy, driven by the country manager Davide Marini, fixed all our issues and added additional computation power for free. This is a great example of customer care. They could have done it right the first time of course, but admitting the errors and putting in place such a remediation plan has been a very professional behavior.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The technical support for this solution is pretty good."
"The tool's most valuable features are its price and flexibility. It has high performance."
"All of the features are useful, and we found that the issue we were having in our previous environment, which was high latency on the storage, we are not experiencing anymore because the high IOPS on the storage are very good for us."
"The solution is very scalable."
"The solution is scalable."
"The program is stable."
"It was easy to deploy."
"We're doing a lot of VMware for IT so this solution is really valuable from a VMH point of view. We're trying to assist our customers mainly with management, because that's what they want. The most important aspects are ease of management, as well as ease of configuration, allowing them to attach additional nodes and resources for the applications."
"The ability of this solution to scale on-demand is great."
"The most valuable feature, currently, is the density of the system as hardware. I'm able to leverage the density of the product and remove bigger hardware which requires more space, cooling, and power costs, obviously. There are cost savings, obviously."
"I like how the solution gives you the ability to basically grow compute and storage separately, and there is no compute processing used for storage IO so that means that the compute is purely satisfying user workloads."
"HCI has helped with storage persistence across private and hybrid clouds for the last year. It's faster and more reliable with minimal downtime, as it doesn't require any maintenance."
"In my opinion, HCI is a good product, easy to use and scalable."
"The benefits for our organization are the performance that we're able to get out of it, as well as the guaranteed minimum performance from a storage perspective."
"The best thing about the product is this is the only appliance in the market that separates control of storage from compute."
"When you are doing lifecycles for your equipment, you can just swap out pieces of equipment. We used to do one big iron to another big iron, and that's a major migration hassle. Whereas, with this environment, you can go with small nodes, one at a time, and do a refresh."
 

Cons

"The tool needs to improve its storage. It should also make migration to the cloud easier."
"I recommend adding some more monitoring tools."
"There should be more functionality available for routing."
"We are still hoping for better ways to incorporate AI. We have to extend third-party access to PowerFlex by calling the API. It would be easier if the product had built-in AI integration. If PowerFlex can contribute more to AI, it would be more useful."
"The solution is not as scalable as it should be."
"The tool is a bit difficult to configure, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The installation is complex."
"The storage capability must be improved."
"In the next version I would like to see bigger GPU types and insurance for including transparency."
"The problem is that it needs to be much more stable, for example, when I want to do the upgrade to 1.7 that just released, I also need to issue a ticket to the support guy in India and he asked me to deploy another mlock. There are a lot of manual steps compared with other products."
"The fact that it doesn't have all the data points we need and all the historical data that I would like. I find that a lot of the performance analysis is done through support, where they have something that we don't have. It would be nice just to have all that on-prem."
"There's a limitation with a block in the file. That's where I see that it's not very efficient for upgrades and for management."
"The networking needs improvement."
"The initial setup is very painful. It's not straightforward, requires a lot of knowledge to get it going."
"It would be great if they took something like kernel storage and integrated straight into the NetApp as well."
"I would like to see a better upgrade process, like the one that ONTAP has."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is fair, it is priced in the average range amongst competitors."
"If one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the price as eight and a half. The tool is expensive."
"The cost of this solution is fair."
"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The product is expensive."
"From my perspective, pricing is expensive. If they can reduce the pricing or offer more customer incentives, it would attract more users."
"The solution's pricing could be much cheaper and affordable."
"The solution is expensive and I give the cost a two out of ten."
"Its price is comparable to the competitors in the market."
"This solution saved our organization time (35 percent) and money. We have a hefty group of developers, and if you multiply that by 30 to 35 percent, that is quite a bit of money."
"This solution reduced our maintenance costs. We were going to have to pay one to two million dollars to put in compute nodes. We are avoiding those costs."
"Its price is aligned with the market. In addition to the standard licensing fees, there is an integrator cost."
"Licenses run on a yearly basis, and there aren't any additional fees other than the standard licensing fee."
"Its pricing is lower than our previous solution."
"There are the overall infrastructure costs. Even though the initial costing was higher, we calculated for year-to-year for five years. That brought us into a position where we decided, we have to go for HCI rather than having distributor systems."
"The price of the solution is okay but could improve."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which HCI solutions are best for your needs.
896,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Construction Company
14%
Marketing Services Firm
12%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Wholesaler/Distributor
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise16
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise19
 

Questions from the Community

What are the major differences between VxRail and Dell EMC PowerFlex?
VxRail vs. Dell EMC PowerFlex VxRail provides stable solutions for technical problems while at the same time not being too expensive for a company to invest in. Even if the user is working with a l...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC PowerFlex?
Dell PowerFlex is a premium software-defined infrastructure solution and while the initial investment may seem higher than traditional SAN or mid-tier HCI solutions, the long-term TCO is competitive.
What needs improvement with Dell EMC PowerFlex?
Area of Improvement: While PowerFlex Manager is powerful, the UI could be more intuitive, especially for first-time users or non-technical admins. Streamlined navigation, contextual help and guided...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

VxFlex, VxRack FLEX, PowerFlex
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Canopy, 8x8Inc., Atos, Canadian Pacific, City of Denton, CenturyLink, BNP Paribas, Asyaport, EDF, CSC, Fox Sports, Insight, Hunter, KPIT, Paetec, Rosetta Stone, Sonda, Xerox
American Showa, Children's Mercy, Coca-Cola, Consultel Cloud, Evangelische Landeskirche in Wurttemberg, Imperva, Surface Mount Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Nutanix, Broadcom and others in HCI. Updated: May 2026.
896,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.