We performed a comparison between Dell PowerEdge M and HPE BladeSystem based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out in this report how the two Blade Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The solution is made with high-quality hardware."
"The most valuable feature of Dell PowerEdge M is iDRAC."
"It is easy to manage by an administrator and we can spend valuable time on other IT issues."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The networking features for administration and working with the server are valuable."
"The solution integrated well."
"It's great for managing overall infrastructure."
"It helps us to manage multiple chassis from a single website."
"The solution uses less cabling and less space in the data center."
"HPE BladeSystem is very easy to use."
"The product is quite stable. Its performance is reliable."
"The most valuable feature, of course, is its size as I can build a huge compute resource on it."
"The solution has good scalability."
"The most valuable feature of HPE BladeSystem is the ease of management. It is easy to communicate from the server to the storage."
"The solution uses a smaller space in our data centers. It uses less feeder and network cable, which reduces costs."
"HPE BladeSystem provides good commuting performance."
"In terms of improvement, it should also offer a hyper-converged option."
"Can be improved by being proactive in making changes that could improve the solution."
"The firmware updates for the product need improvement."
"I would like to have additional HPC and AI capabilities on general Dell PowerEdge servers."
"The set up is complex"
"Dell PowerEdge M needs to run AMD CPUs on it."
"More interconnections with third party equipment and limited I/O selection."
"There is room for improvement in scalability."
"The management side of this solution could be improved."
"OA updates and upgrades have to be made simpler."
"Some part of virtual connections needs improvement."
"HPE BladeSystem can improve proactive monitoring."
"The latest version of this system is called Synergy from HPE, and it comes with more advanced features. This is currently the most advanced solution available in the market. One of its key features is its energy efficiency, which optimizes energy usage."
"The only side that must be improved is the active-passive interconnect module architecture."
"BladeSystem is an old-fashioned server and not very well developed for new features and new areas of data centers, which is not very good for enterprise companies."
"I rate the stability of HPE BladeSystem a nine out of ten."
The Dell PowerEdge M-Series blade servers address the challenges of an evolving IT environment by delivering leading enterprise classfeatures and functionality. The M-Series delivers a unique array of options configured to meet the needs of your IT environment both now and in the future.
Dell PowerEdge M is ranked 4th in Blade Servers with 7 reviews while HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 21 reviews. Dell PowerEdge M is rated 8.6, while HPE BladeSystem is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Dell PowerEdge M writes "The solution is a foundational part of our IT infrastructure and offers remarkable flexibility, reliability, and extensive software support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Good service, reliable, and remotely accessible through the iLO feature". Dell PowerEdge M is most compared with HPE Synergy, HPE Superdome X, Cisco UCS B-Series, Super Micro SuperBlade and Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series, whereas HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series, Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE Superdome X. See our Dell PowerEdge M vs. HPE BladeSystem report.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.