No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

DeepSource vs Endor Labs comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DeepSource
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
50th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Static Code Analysis (22nd)
Endor Labs
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
35th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Build Automation (32nd), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (19th), Software Supply Chain Security (15th), DevSecOps (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of DeepSource is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Endor Labs is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Endor Labs0.8%
DeepSource0.5%
Other98.7%
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Retailer
8%
Construction Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
10%
University
9%
Construction Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: March 2026.
886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: March 2026.
886,174 professionals have used our research since 2012.