Datadog vs OmniPeek comparison

Datadog and BlueCat are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Datadog is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while BlueCat is ranked #38 with an average rating of 8.0. Datadog holds a 4.6% mindshare in APM, compared to BlueCat’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Datadog users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of BlueCat users who would recommend it.

Datadog

Read 211 Datadog reviews

36,582 Views
17,559 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

OmniPeek

Read 8 OmniPeek reviews

3,403 Views
1,633 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Datadog

OmniPeek

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Datadog and OmniPeek compete in the network monitoring and performance analysis category. Datadog appears to hold the upper hand due to its strong visualization tools, extensive integrations, and hosted model which simplifies infrastructure management.

Features: Datadog offers hosted services removing infrastructure burdens with key elements like sharable dashboards, extensive APIs, and seamless integrations with platforms such as AWS and Docker. It simplifies upgrades and enhances user experience with its visualization tools and intuitive tagging. OmniPeek focuses on comprehensive packet analysis offering valuable insights into network performance with real-time analytics and application visibility that appeal to a focused user base.

Room for Improvement: Datadog encounters challenges with performance, especially with older metric data, and users seek more granular dashboard control, enhanced notifications, and consistent APIs. Advanced front-end integration is also desired. OmniPeek's automation is less developed, with a perceived flexibility disadvantage compared to Wireshark. Its centralized configuration management can improve, particularly for multi-site setups.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datadog supports a broad range of cloud environments, offering flexibility across public, private, and hybrid clouds, and generally provides responsive customer service despite occasional communication hiccups. OmniPeek is primarily on-premises, offering excellent but sometimes slower customer service. Datadog's strengths lie in robust cloud support and quick issue resolution, while OmniPeek excels in detailed deployment support.

Pricing and ROI: Datadog's pricing is often seen as high, especially for large data volumes, emphasizing the need for cautious service usage monitoring to avoid unexpected costs. Despite the high cost of ownership, it offers value through increased operational efficiency and faster issue resolution, leading to high ROI. Alternatively, OmniPeek's pricing is competitive and provides a cost advantage, though it may lack scalability. Datadog offers significant ROI through enhanced response times and reduced downtime, while OmniPeek users find it cost-effective with a strong feature set for network analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed Datadog vs. OmniPeek Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Datadog vs. OmniPeek

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,588 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Datadog

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

1st

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

211

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (2nd), Log Management (4th), Container Monitoring (3rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (1st), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), AI Observability (1st)

OmniPeek

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

38th

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

47th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Datadog is 4.6%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OmniPeek is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Datadog	4.6%
OmniPeek	0.6%
Other	94.8%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Dhroov Patel

Site Reliability Engineer at Grainger

Has improved incident response with better root cause visibility and supports flexible on-call scheduling

Datadog needs to introduce more hard limits to cost. If we see a huge log spike, administrators should have more control over what happens to save costs. If a service starts logging extensively, I want the ability to automatically direct that log into the cheapest log bucket. This should be the case with many offerings. If we're seeing too much APM, we need to be aware of it and able to stop it rather than having administrators reach out to specific teams. Datadog has become significantly slower over the last year. They could improve performance at the risk of slowing down feature work. More resources need to go into Fleet Automation because we face many problems with things such as the Ansible role to install Datadog in non-containerized hosts. We mainly want to see performance improvements, less time spent looking at costs, the ability to trust that costs will stay reasonable, and an easier way to manage our agents. It is such a powerful tool with much potential on the horizon, but cost control, performance, and agent management need improvement. The main issues are with the administrative side rather than the actual application.

Read full review

AjayKumar19

Senior Software Engineer at Microchip Technology Inc.

Helps analyze network packets effectively and saves time for testers

I have utilized the packet capturing capabilities in OmniPeek. Using the Alpha sniffer and hardware-supported network devices, we can perform sniffer capturing for Wi-Fi wireless packets and router packets. The interface allows us to capture packets and observe connection establishment, data transfer, and the downloading and uploading of packets, such as TCP and UDP packets. The software works for both wireless and wired connections, including Ethernet. As a wireless test engineer in the wireless industry, the features of OmniPeek help me monitor network activity. While there are alternatives such as Wireshark, OmniPeek supports Windows and is particularly helpful for testers, especially for device certification validation. This software enables packet analysis to verify protocol compliance and identify issues. For developers, packet captures from OmniPeek assist in understanding and debugging issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The application performance monitoring is pretty good."

"APM and tracing are super useful."

"I like that you can build out a dashboard pretty quickly. There are some things that come out of the box that you don't really need to do, which is great because they're default settings."

"One of the solution's greatest aspects is its overall simplicity; it is very easy to use and easier to handle than other brands we have access to."

"The solution's SaaS model is easy to manage and works well in single- or multi-cloud environments."

"The performance of Datadog is good."

"Metric graphing and Dashboards are the most valuable features because they give us good observability into our system and work well to alert us when interesting things happen."

"However, Datadog has so far been a breeze to use and set up."

More Datadog pros

"OmniPeek shows the entire packet flow and structure, particularly in security-related scenarios, whereas Wireshark sometimes fails to capture all packets."

"I believe the most crucial feature of OmniPeek search is the ability to sniff packets based on channel switching."

"The most valuable feature of OmniPeek was the ability it gave us to see the connection procedure."

"The most valuable feature of OmniPeek is the ability to assign custom color codes to the different packets easily."

"OmniPeek's ability to convert application visibility into flow helps me quickly understand application performance over LAN, WAN, or wireless."

"This is a good product; I would recommend and encourage people to use it because it has helped me a lot in the field."

"The most valuable features are the voice bot, which checks the quality of service for voice, and the expert view that gives me insight on what and where to troubleshoot."

"The most valuable feature is OmniPeek is user-friendly."

More OmniPeek pros

Cons

"When the logs are too big, and Datadog splits them, the JSON format breaks and it is not so useful for us."

"The installation is easy for me. However, if you are new to this solution it might not be so easy."

"There could be more easily identifiable documentation on how to find different things on the platform."

"The correlation between the logs and the metrics needs improvement as most cases, we might use another logging tool (that is cheaper in cost) which we then have to link together."

"The query performance could be improved, particularly when handling large datasets, as slower response times can hinder efficiency."

"It is very difficult to make the solutions fit perfectly for large organizations, especially in terms of high cardinality objects and multi-tenancy, where the data needs to be rolled up to a summarized level while maintaining its individual data granularity and identifiers."

"We would love to see a % consumed and alert us if we are over budget before getting an overage charge 20 days into the month."

"The pricing is a bit confusing."

More Datadog cons

"I would like to see the saving feature improved. We have had issues if you do not save your progress then you have to start from the beginning."

"I don't see a clear roadmap in the future for improving this software."

"Making it more clear on how to configure the filters, or really automating them, would be an improvement."

"OmniPeek doesn't support Linux or Unix installations, which prompted the shift to Wireshark."

"Centralized management of configurations needs improvement."

"The solution's automation has room for improvement."

"Sometimes setting up the filters for the product is difficult, and I can't quickly sharpen them from the home screen."

"I would like to see the tool work in an open environment the same as how it does in a closed environment."

More OmniPeek cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"At my last company, we did see ROI, specifically around response time. We could get to mission critical things that were down and losing revenue on immediately. So, the product paid itself back."

"Pricing and licensing are reasonable for what they give you. You get the first five hosts free, which is fun to play around with. Then it's about four dollars a month per host, which is very affordable for what you get out of it. We have a lot of hosts that we put a lot of custom metrics into, and every host gives you an allowance for the number of custom metrics."

"I am not satisfied with its licensing. Its payment is based on the exported data, and there was an explosion of the data for three or four weeks. My customer was not alerted, and there was no way for them to see that there has been an explosion of data. They got a big invoice for one or two months. The pricing model of Datadog is based on the data. The customer was quite surprised about not being alerted about this explosion of data. They should provide some kind of alert when there is an increase in usage."

"The price of Datadog is reasonable. Other solutions are more expensive, such as AppDynamics."

"Licensing is based on the retention period of logs and metrics."

"The cost is high and this can be justified if the scale of the environment is big."

"It has always scaled for us. Cost scales up too, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. It's reasonable for what they're providing."

"It has a module-based pricing model."

More Datadog pricing and cost advice

"We have only purchased the add-on once and have not paid for any subsequent versions as it was too costly for us."

"The pricing for this solution could be improved, as it is a very expensive product."

"There are different types of licenses available."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,588 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	82
Midsize Enterprise	49
Large Enterprise	100

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OmniPeek?

There isn't anything specific that needs improvement in OmniPeek, as it performs better than Wireshark for our requirements. However, OmniPeek could benefit from supporting different platforms. Pla...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OmniPeek?

I have been working with the OmniPeek product for almost two years at the start of my career, primarily using it for wireless 802.11 Wi-Fi packets, sniffer, and analysis. My experience with OmniPee...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OmniPeek?

I didn't explore much about OmniPeek beyond its basic features. OmniPeek is user-friendly and easy to start working with, especially on the Windows platform. For beginners, it is very easy to handl...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

New Relic vs Datadog

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Datadog

Compared 2% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Datadog

Compared 2% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Datadog

Compared 2% of the time

More Datadog Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs OmniPeek

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs OmniPeek

Compared 7% of the time

Alluvio AppResponse vs OmniPeek

Compared 6% of the time

TruView vs OmniPeek

Compared 6% of the time

Colasoft Capsa vs OmniPeek

Compared 6% of the time

More OmniPeek Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Datadog

June 2026

Download Datadog product report

Buyer's Guide

OmniPeek

June 2026

Download OmniPeek product report

Also Known As

No data available

Savvius OmniPeek

Overview

Datadog integrates extensive monitoring solutions with features like customizable dashboards and real-time alerting, supporting efficient system management. Its seamless integration capabilities with tools like AWS and Slack make it a critical part of cloud infrastructure monitoring.

Datadog offers centralized logging and monitoring, making troubleshooting fast and efficient. It facilitates performance tracking in cloud environments such as AWS and Azure, utilizing tools like EC2 and APM for service management. Custom metrics and alerts improve the ability to respond to issues swiftly, while real-time tools enhance system responsiveness. However, users express the need for improved query performance, a more intuitive UI, and increased integration capabilities. Concerns about the pricing model's complexity have led to calls for greater transparency and control, and additional advanced customization options are sought. Datadog's implementation requires attention to these aspects, with enhanced documentation and onboarding recommended to reduce the learning curve.

What are Datadog's Key Features?

Sharable Dashboards: Facilitate collaboration with customizable, intuitive dashboards.
Extensive Integrations: Seamlessly connects with tools like Slack and AWS to support workflows.
APM and RUM: Provides deep insights into application performance and user interactions.
Real-Time Tools: Enables agile responses to system issues with real-time monitoring.
Unified Tagging and Visualization: Eases management of complex systems with simplified visualization.

What Benefits and ROI Should Users Look For?

Efficient Troubleshooting: Centralized logging speeds up the identification and resolution of issues.
Streamlined Workflows: Integrations with popular tools enhance operational efficiency.
Improved Observability: Comprehensive monitoring improves system reliability and performance.
Resource Optimization: Efficient microservices and container management leads to better cloud resource utilization.
Responsive Alerts: Customizable alerts ensure timely identification of critical issues.

In industries like finance and technology, Datadog is implemented for its monitoring capabilities across cloud architectures. Its ability to aggregate logs and provide a unified view enhances reliability in environments demanding high performance. By leveraging real-time insights and integration with platforms like AWS and Azure, organizations in these sectors efficiently manage their cloud infrastructures, ensuring optimal performance and proactive issue resolution.

Datadog

OmniPeek enables effective network monitoring by offering packet capturing capabilities for Wi-Fi and routers, providing insights crucial for maintaining network performance and troubleshooting issues.

OmniPeek serves as a pivotal tool for wireless packet analysis, assisting teams with capturing and analyzing Wi-Fi 802.11 packets across standards. It aids in testing WLAN protocols and provides application performance and security analytics, supporting network issue monitoring, protocol analysis, and troubleshooting both on-premises and cloud applications. Real-time analytics integration with LiveNX and expert view functionalities make it a preferred choice for user-friendly network operation, although improvements in platform support, automation, and guidance are sought by users.

What are OmniPeek's key features?

Packet Capturing: Efficiently captures Wi-Fi and router packets for robust network analysis.
Channel-Based Sniffing: Monitors DFS and non-DFS transitions, vital for network stability.
Real-Time Analytics: Integrates with LiveNX for live data insights.
Custom Color Coding: Enhances packet visibility for easier analysis.
Expert View: Offers in-depth troubleshooting capabilities.

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of Use: Simple interface enhances usability and efficiency.
Protocol Compliance: Verifies protocols for reliable network operations.
Application Performance Monitoring: Ensures optimal application functionality.
Voice Quality Checks: Maintains high communication standards.

OmniPeek is implemented across sectors that require precise wireless packet analysis. It's crucial for testing WLAN protocols, validating IP blocks, and ensuring network performance during enterprise-level authentications and internet egress, offering organizations user-friendly solutions for comprehensive WLAN monitoring.

BlueCat

Sample Customers

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's

Apcon, Aruba Networks, Avaya Inc., Cisco Systems, Ekahau, Gigamon Systems, HP, IBM, IXIA, Meru Networks, Napatech, NextComputing, Procera Networks, Qualcomm Atheros, Ralink Technology Corporation, Telchemy

Buyer's Guide

Datadog vs. OmniPeek

June 2026

Free Report: Datadog vs. OmniPeek

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog vs. OmniPeek and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,588 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Datadog vs. OmniPeek report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.