We performed a comparison between DarwinBox and Oracle Taleo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution that we used previously was very complex. As a result, without referring to the manuals and consulting an expert, it was difficult for a newly hired employee to navigate the platform. However, this is not the case with Darwinbox. It has a very intuitive user interface, and anyone can use it and implement it without having to use a guide or a walk through process. It's very simple."
"In our company, we use DarwinBox to maintain the data of our employees and for recruitment purposes."
"The most valuable features of the solution are organogram and position-based mapping."
"Performance and goal management are good to have, based on certain client requirements where the user base isn't too large, but the most workable domain of Taleo is the recruiting module."
"The Talent Acquisition and Headhunting features are good."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"The solution offers good benefits for administrators."
"It is easy to use. Requisition management and pre-screening are the two most valuable features."
"Good integration capabilities and extensibility."
"The solution's API integration with third-party applications should be improved."
"DarwinBox is not a stable solution...DarwinBox is not a scalable solution."
"Like most software, it has a base version, the vanilla, out-of-the-box version, and customization is required to match it to the unique processes of each company. The Darwinbox team seems to be having difficulty with the customization process. They have to be a little more mature to customize it as per every company's need."
"I don't see very valuable features in this product because it has an old way of interpreting ATS. It should be more flexible in managing datasets and data searches. The screening data is a long process in Taleo."
"In terms of Oracle Taleo as a product, there are a lot of things which can be developed; most feedback which I have heard from customers is about the dashboard and the home page, both of which are quite basic."
"Lacks some systems that we need."
"It would be ideal if we could integrate the solution with Olympia. It would be helpful if we could add another support desk for an IT person. It would be great if the product was more interdisciplinary and could include IT."
"There are always going to be little caveats here and there that you might not have known about as far as changes are concerned, however, it's not business-oriented to the point where the business shuts down."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The bulk recruitment feature does not work well."
DarwinBox is ranked 21st in Talent Management with 3 reviews while Oracle Taleo is ranked 14th in Talent Management with 14 reviews. DarwinBox is rated 6.4, while Oracle Taleo is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of DarwinBox writes "The product's servers, integration capabilities, and user interface needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Taleo writes "Recruiting module is highly usable, with good performance and goal management features". DarwinBox is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, ZingHR, PeopleStrong , Workday and Ramco HCM, whereas Oracle Taleo is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, PeopleSoft, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday and Eightfold Talent Intelligence Platform. See our DarwinBox vs. Oracle Taleo report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
