We performed a comparison between Cymulate and Veracode based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Penetration Testing Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The reporting capabilities are very good."
"The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day."
"When we do have errors, Veracode is always available, their consultants, to help us either mitigate the error, or provide technical assistance on pointing exactly where the problem is and how we could probably fix it. I'm always amazed at how knowledgeable they are."
"The user interface is excellent, the code review process is quick and provides great analytics to understand our code better, and the SAST scan is high-speed."
"The most valuable feature of Veracode Static Analysis is the scanning."
"Regarding Software Composition Analysis, an exceptional feature is that during a SAST scan, SCA is seamlessly conducted in the background."
"The most valuable feature is the SAST capability and its integration into the Veracode pipelines."
"Tech support is outstanding. Best in class. Absolutely. They bend over backwards to help us. We'll come up with questions and within minutes, we'll get answers. It's amazing. It's truly amazing."
"It has improved the quality of code being delivered for test and its vulnerability resolutions timeline has improved."
"The source composition analysis component is great because it gives our developers some comfort in using new libraries."
"The product must provide consultancy for initial setup."
"The reporting process requires significant improvement as it often takes longer than expected and the quality is lacking."
"Veracode's ability to fix flaws is less sophisticated than that of its competitors."
"Some features could be improved in terms of user-friendliness."
"The training lab is not very user-friendly and takes a long time to set up."
"The scanning could be improved, because some scans take a bit of time."
"I would like to see more technical support for some of the connectors, some more detailed diagrams or run-books on how to install some of stuff; more hand-holding in the sense of understanding our environment."
"Scanning large amounts of code can be a time-consuming process and there is scope for improvement."
"It needs better controls to include/exclude specific sections when creating a report that can be shared externally with customers and prospects."
"There are many times when their product goes to check my code and it dies, and I don't know why. I've contacted support and they're not really helpful with this particular problem. I go to the logs and I look at what I can but I can't tell why the check process has essentially just died in the middle of checking."
Cymulate is ranked 15th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews while Veracode is ranked 2nd in Penetration Testing Services with 194 reviews. Cymulate is rated 9.0, while Veracode is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cymulate writes "An affordable solution that improves an organization’s security posture and provides excellent reporting capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veracode writes "Helps to reduce false positives and prevent vulnerable code from entering production, but does not support incremental scanning ". Cymulate is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, XM Cyber, SafeBreach and AttackIQ, whereas Veracode is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx One, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and OWASP Zap. See our Cymulate vs. Veracode report.
See our list of best Penetration Testing Services vendors.
We monitor all Penetration Testing Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
