CylanceOPTICS vs SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform comparison

BlackBerry and Secpod Technologies are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. BlackBerry is ranked #53 with an average rating of 4.0, while Secpod Technologies is ranked #40 with an average rating of 9.0. BlackBerry holds a 0.6% mindshare in EDR, compared to Secpod Technologies’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Secpod Technologies users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform and CylanceOPTICS compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. CylanceOPTICS seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and perceived value by users.

Features: Users value the comprehensive vulnerability management, automated patching capabilities, and robust pricing of SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform. CylanceOPTICS is notable for its AI-driven threat detection, response features, and perceived superior value by users. Although both products offer valuable functionalities, CylanceOPTICS’s advanced AI integration gives it an edge.

Room for Improvement: SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform users suggest improvements in scalability, customization, and broader ecosystem compatibility. CylanceOPTICS users highlight the need for better integration with third-party tools, enhanced flexibility, and scalability as areas for improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is preferred for its straightforward deployment and exceptional customer service. CylanceOPTICS deployment is noted as more complex, but users commend its dedicated support team.

Pricing and ROI: SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is considered cost-effective with a straightforward pricing model, offering a favorable return on investment due to its comprehensive feature set. CylanceOPTICS, while priced higher, is justified by its advanced threat detection capabilities. Users feel the higher cost of CylanceOPTICS is worth the investment due to its superior features and security performance.

To learn more, read our detailed CylanceOPTICS vs. SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CylanceOPTICS vs. SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.4%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CylanceOPTICS is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.4%
SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform	0.4%
CylanceOPTICS	0.6%
Other	95.6%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

GauthamVakapalli

Account Manager at Teksalah

Provides reliable threat detection and response but requires better regional support

One improvement I suggest for CylanceOPTICS is more robust marketing efforts from their side. Many customers gravitate towards popular EDRs like CrowdStrike or Sophos, largely due to better marketing, despite BlackBerry Cylance being a superior product. The lack of marketing from distributors or vendors is a critical area where they are falling short. Apart from marketing, it would be beneficial for CylanceOPTICS to establish a dedicated team in GCC since I coordinate with the UK team to handle support. Whenever a ticket is raised by one of our customers, we have to wait for responses which can take a whole day due to the time zone differences, and a local team could expedite this process. In terms of scalability, CylanceOPTICS is indeed easy to scale, but one issue I face is related to visibility; while it is scalable, the security teams struggle with limited visibility as we need to gather data from multiple sources.

Read full review

JAN MICHAEL UY

Information Technology Supervisor at DMCI Homes, Inc.

Can automate updates and manage software licenses more effectively

Our team uses the SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform for threat detection, focusing on features like vulnerabilities and asset exposure. The asset exposure feature is packaged with software licenses and machines. We get the latest updates and patches for Windows workstations and applications for remediation. We can automate these updates, which greatly improves our previous manual and scripting-based tools. Before, we struggled with setting policies and making changes to workstations. Now, we can automate updates and manage software licenses more effectively. We monitor who's using various licenses like Office, CAD, Visio, and Lumion.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It detected stuff that other things wouldn't detect."

"The stability of the solution is very good, we have about 100 users on it right now, and we use it twice a week."

"It is easy to use."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription."

"It is an easy-to-use tool."

"The user interface of the solution is sophisticated and straightforward."

"Cortex is a very good total solution on the endpoints."

"Since they've done their most recent update, the ease to isolate endpoints is valuable. If we find one where there is a virus on it, we can easily isolate it. We don't even have to contact the user. We don't have to manually take them off the network. We can easily isolate them."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The solution is pretty stable; it's pretty rock solid."

"Cylance seems to be able to meet our customers' requirements for the time being."

"One of the main use cases for CylanceOPTICS is endpoint detection and response, which even works without internet, unlike some other solutions."

"You can use the solution to query certain things."

"It automatically blocks the threats, helping us investigate if they harm the environment."

"The technical support personnel I interacted with were good."

"It's pretty unintrusive"

"I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. I would give it a close ten as possible because, like SentinelOne, I've seen incompatibility. Whereas Cylance, I've seen none."

More CylanceOPTICS pros

"Although it is, in fact, a complete vulnerability management solution, the most valuable feature is the patch management functionality. Most of our customers give preference to this tool over other tools when it comes to patch management."

"Our team uses the SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform for threat detection, focusing on features like vulnerabilities and asset exposure. The asset exposure feature is packaged with software licenses and machines. We get the latest updates and patches for Windows workstations and applications for remediation. We can automate these updates, which greatly improves our previous manual and scripting-based tools."

Cons

"It is not a suitable solution if you are looking for a single product with multiple features such as DLP, encryption, rollback, etc."

"I would like to see some additional features related to email protection included."

"The solution should offer more dashboards and they should be better customized."

"In the next release, I would like to see more UI improvements. Their UI is a bit basic. When we are speaking about Palo Alto Networks they are the big company, so they can improve the UI a little bit. The UI, the reports, the log system can all be improved."

"When it comes to malware files, it should be a little quick because, at times, it would give a wrong result in the sense of what it might be on malware, even if it still might be a normal one."

"It should support more mobile operating systems. That is one of the cons of their infrastructure right now."

"When it comes to core analysis, and security analysis, Cortex needs to provide more information."

"It would be good if they could make an exception for applications. Sometimes, it can be a bit of a challenge to make exceptions for certain applications that have been used as rogue."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The tools are ineffective. It flags a lot of things. To give you an example, it detected Google Chrome and blocked the user's access to it. That it mistook for malicious, which turned out to be a false positive."

"The support is inadequate because their technical people are not supportive. Since the support is not based in India, there are numerous issues."

"False positives could be improved. Cylance picks up a lot of them."

"CylanceOPTICS could benefit from more granular control in the timeline-building process. Ideally, users would be able to drill deeper into the analysis rather than have the machine dictate the direction."

"The reporting is very weak and not very good at all."

"The technical support could be improved although it's probably better than you get with a lot of the other traditional antivirus solutions"

"Our customers would like to see more automation with respect to how threats are handled once they have been detected."

More CylanceOPTICS cons

"SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform needs to incorporate more documentation."

"SanerNow has good integration with the more well known ITSM tools, but at the same time there are many other ITSM (IT Service Management) tools available in the market, including local tools here in India, and I'm not sure how SanerNow plans to integrate with them all out of the box."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is quite an expensive solution."

"Licensing for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR can be costly, especially when it comes to a hundred users. A license is required for each user, and the subscription must be renewed on a yearly basis."

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

"This is an expensive solution."

"Very costly product."

"Our customers have expressed that the price is high."

"We didn't have to pay any additional fee for the cloud instance. It just came with the renewal, which was nice."

"The price of the solution is high for the license and in general."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"The pricing for CylanceOPTICS is very good; I would rate it around a nine on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the lowest. It's one of the most affordable options I've seen."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of five."

"We pay for the number of endpoints we have and that is about it. On a monthly basis, the licensing cost is $55 per user."

"CylanceOPTICS is probably priced equal to other EDRs in the market."

"As with several other solutions such as Microsoft MECM and SCCM, the licensing for SanerNow involves per-device pricing for each kind of product or service on offer."

"The pricing is reasonable - we paid about 2.5 million for 3,500 nodes."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	47

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Optics?

In terms of cost, I find CylanceOPTICS to be reasonable; it's not overly expensive, nor is it at the lower end of the...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Blackberry Optics?

One improvement I suggest for CylanceOPTICS is more robust marketing efforts from their side. Many customers gravitat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Blackberry Optics?

One of the main use cases for CylanceOPTICS is endpoint detection and response, which even works without internet, un...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SanerNow?

The pricing is reasonable - we paid about 2.5 million for 3,500 nodes.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SanerNow?

SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform needs to incorporate more documentation.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SanerNow?

We use the tool for patch, application, and vulnerability management.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 9% of the time

Rapid7 InsightIDR vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 8% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs CylanceOPTICS

Compared 5% of the time

More CylanceOPTICS Competitors

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform vs SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Red Canary vs SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform

Compared 5% of the time

BigFix vs SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

March 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

CylanceOPTICS

March 2026

Download CylanceOPTICS product report

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

February 2026

Download SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

SecPod SanerNow, SanerNow RP

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Our cloud-native BlackBerry® Optics provide visibility, on-device threat detection and remediation across your organization. In milliseconds. And our EDR approach effectively and efficiently hunts threats while eliminating response latency. It’s the difference between a minor security event—and one that’s widespread and uncontrolled.

BlackBerry

SecPod’s SanerNow CVEM prevents cyberattacks. It is a fully integrated, continuous, & automated platform designed to help enterprise IT Security Teams overcome security risks posed by vulnerabilities and misconfigurations. The solution offers seven modules driven by one agent & can be operationalized through an integrated cloud console.

SanerNow Continuous Vulnerability & Exposure Management (CVEM) platform offers an innovative approach to cyber-attack prevention and attack surface management.

SanerNow, with its CVEM capabilities, offers a new outlook on cybersecurity by evaluating enterprise IT infrastructure from a weakness perspective.

By integrating seven modules in one platform, the solution offers a unified approach to tackle IT infrastructure weaknesses - from scanning & detecting vulnerabilities & misconfigurations, asset exposure management, risk prioritization, patch management, endpoint management, and compliance management.

The seven modules are:

SanerNow AE: Discover and monitor usage of hardware and software assets in your IT network, manage licenses and more, daily.

SanerNow CPAM: Continuous assessment of 70+ anomalies on 2000+ data points of infrastructure/posture to detect outliers, trends, and security control deviations.

SanerNow VM: Detect, assess, and prioritize vulnerabilities on devices using industry’s fastest scanner & world’s largest security intelligence library of 160,000+ checks.

SanerNow CM: Detect and fix misconfigurations to harden systems and comply with regulatory standards or custom policies.

SanerNow RP: Prioritize risk of vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and other weaknesses, remediate effectively.

SanerNow PM: Integrated patch management to automatically deploy patches for 30+ version of Windows, Linux, Mac OSs and 400+ third-party applications.

SanerNow EM: Get complete visibility into your endpoints and use 100+ security controls for software deployment, system tune-up, application & device control, and more.

The platform offers infrastructure inventory visibility, network anomaly normalization, detection, prioritization, remediation & system hardening of endpoints across every infrastructure layer.

It improves risk visibility beyond software vulnerabilities, expanding the scope of vulnerability management by monitoring more than 100 endpoint health controls, deploying/uninstalling software system health monitoring, eliminating rogue processes and applications, identifying malicious connections and devices, applying system-level security controls, system tuning, fix deviations and anomalies and building queries to get instant visibility to security risks.

Secpod Technologies

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Cerdant, Washoe County School District

Siemens, Aruba, SironLabs, POS Aviation, Kotak, Kaizen Automotive, Amagi, McNeilus Steel, Claremont, Glassbeam, Marlabs, Amazon Web Services

Buyer's Guide

CylanceOPTICS vs. SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform

March 2026

Free Report: CylanceOPTICS vs. SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about CylanceOPTICS vs. SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CylanceOPTICS vs. SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.