No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CyberProof vs Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberProof
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
21st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP) (14th), Vulnerability Management (83rd), Penetration Testing Services (22nd), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (43rd)
Qualys Enterprise TruRisk M...
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) category, the mindshare of CyberProof is 1.3%. The mindshare of Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management is 2.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management2.3%
CyberProof1.3%
Other96.4%
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Use CyberProof?
Leave a review
Roshan Ugale - PeerSpot reviewer
Junior Associate at ESDS Software Solution Limited
Comprehensive risk scanning has protected servers and improves monthly vulnerability remediation
Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management has a few things that need to be enhanced. First, there is the issue of superseded patches. Superseded means if we miss the current month patch, for example, if we miss the January patch to deploy on a particular server, Microsoft includes January changes in the second month security patch, and then the second month security patch includes all things in March. For example, if we miss two month patches and we directly deploy the March month security patch on a system, the other two patches, such as January and February, will be closed. Superseded means these patches are not deployed on a system, but after the latest one, which we already deployed, the older one does not need to be installed or deployed on a system. Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management takes a report of each and every vulnerability and shows that the January month patch was not deployed on a system and the February month patch was not deployed on a system. However, that is not a proper scanning method. If we have already deployed the latest patch that includes the older security things or older security parameters and the latest parameters, when we deploy that latest patch, why does Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management show the older patches also in potential vulnerabilities? That is a main factor that should be improved from Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management. Second, the remedies provided by Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management are sometimes not useful most of the time. In that case, we need to troubleshoot or find out the remedies by ourselves. The remedies will also be something that needs to be improved in the system or in the application.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) solutions are best for your needs.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
21%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management?
The live threat intelligence updates in Qualys are good, with updates provided on the last Friday of each month. However, I am not satisfied with Qualys support. The response time is slower than ne...
What is your primary use case for Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management?
Primarily, I use Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management for assessing the current posture of my infrastructure as I am responsible for vulnerability management for my organization. Qualys Enterprise ...
What advice do you have for others considering Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management?
Agentic AI is one of the models running in the background for Qualys. It is responsible for all vulnerability closures and vulnerability testing. All data collected by agents in the field is gather...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

UST Global
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Zafran Security, Cymulate and others in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM). Updated: March 2026.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.