Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs VIPRE Endpoint Security comparison

Cybereason and VIPRE Security are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Cybereason is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.2, while VIPRE Security is ranked #62. Cybereason holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to VIPRE Security’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of VIPRE Security users who would recommend it.

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Read 21 Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews

3,422 Views
1,923 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Read 2 VIPRE Endpoint Security reviews

429 Views
368 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and VIPRE Endpoint Security both offer endpoint protection solutions. Despite VIPRE being recognized for its features, Cybereason has the upper hand due to its favorable pricing and support.

Features: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response users highlight its threat detection accuracy, ease of use, and customization capabilities. VIPRE Endpoint Security users value its comprehensive protection, lightweight footprint, and rapid threat response.

Room for Improvement: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response users suggest improved reporting, dashboard customizability, and faster system updates. VIPRE Endpoint Security users want better malware detection speed, shorter response times, and enhanced usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is praised for its straightforward deployment process and excellent customer service. VIPRE Endpoint Security also has a smooth deployment process, but users report slightly less responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is considered cost-effective with a strong ROI. VIPRE Endpoint Security is more expensive but delivers good ROI. Cybereason balances cost and return, while VIPRE offers strong returns at a higher price point.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

34th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (23rd)

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

62nd

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 0.8%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VIPRE Endpoint Security is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

Jeremy Tew

Information Technology Director at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Easy to deploy, good price, low overhead, and keeps our Servers and PC's free of virus'

Their management interface is a little buggy as it will hang up and crash from time to time. Although It requires more system resources than the desktop client, adding additional resources' ex. CPU and Memory don't seem to improve it. Its reporting can also be improved as the executive and patching reports are missing the ability to provide what groups of PC's are included in the reports. Also, It's great they patch some third-party software, but it is a limited list expanding this would be a huge improvement. I'm yet to see it properly handle USB Device control.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Immediately we can pick up the computers in the network if any malicious operation that is triggered."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"I haven't had any issues with the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The solution is efficient."

"They do a very good job of providing multi-stage visualizations of malicious operations that immediately show all attack details across all devices and users. Since it is MalOp-centric model, you can see if there has been a similar operation across multiple machines. If it is the same thing appearing on multiple machines, you see all the machines and users affected in one screen."

"We didn't have the visibility that we now have. It has increased our visibility by a lot. So, we put a lot more time into really looking at our environment and what is happening throughout our different networks. It has increased our visibility by around fivefold."

"The initial setup was easy and straightforward."

"Cybereason absolutely enables us to mitigate and isolate on the fly. Our managed detection response telemetry has dropped dramatically since we began using it. It's very top-of-mind. We were running some tabletop exercises and none of the detections were getting triggered by the managed security services provider. So we needed to find a solution that would trigger high-fidelity alerts. That was Cybereason and it dramatically changed our landscape from the detection and response perspective."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

"It has low overhead as far as machine resources are concerned. Everything runs faster with VIPRE installed versus some of the competitors. It has also been pretty easy to use. It just runs and gives us reports. It also sends us alerts when there is something that we need to look at. It does its job, and you just look at the reports. In other ways, you just forget that it is there."

"In general, it was pretty easy to manage."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the product features related to device control, particularly USB management."

"I feel that the product lacks reporting features and needs improvement."

"There can be problems with the EDI."

"It initially took some time to deploy."

"The network coverage becomes an issue most of the time."

"The integration with Microsoft solutions and Microsoft capabilities needs to be improved."

"While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper."

"Ad hoc higher-level reporting to senior management can be improved or can be implemented. That's definitely an area of improvement that they need to focus on."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

"We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for."

"Their management interface is a little buggy. It requires a few system resources on the management interface. Its reporting can also be better. Overall, the reports are pretty good. They patch some third-party software, but if they can expand what they do for reporting and patch enterprise software, it would be handy."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"The pricing is manageable."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

"Its price point has been phenomenal. Our previous solution from Trend Micro was triple the cost of it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

20%

Government

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 28% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 25% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 14% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 11% of the time

More VIPRE Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

May 2025

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

April 2025

Download VIPRE Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

VIPRE Cloud, VIPRE Endpoint Security Cloud Edition, VIPRE Endpoint Security Server Edition

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

VIPRE Endpoint Security provides fast, powerful and easy-to-manage endpoint protection for businesses of all sizes, with a small footprint that won't slow you down.

VIPRE Security

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

College Station ISD, Mid-West Companies, Guardian Network Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

April 2025

Free Report: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.