Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VIPRE Endpoint Security comparison

Microsoft and VIPRE Security are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while VIPRE Security is ranked #60. Microsoft holds a 10.0% mindshare in EPP, compared to VIPRE Security’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of VIPRE Security users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Defender for Endp...

Read 198 Microsoft Defender for Endpoint reviews

37,815 Views
22,311 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Read 2 VIPRE Endpoint Security reviews

592 Views
468 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Microsoft Defender for Endp...

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

VIPRE Endpoint Security and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compete in the endpoint security solutions category. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and higher user satisfaction.

Features: VIPRE Endpoint Security is known for its robust malware detection, ease of use, and low system impact. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint stands out for its advanced threat protection, integration with Microsoft products, and automation capabilities. Users favor Microsoft Defender due to its more extensive and sophisticated feature set.

Room for Improvement: VIPRE Endpoint Security could improve its reporting capabilities, provide more frequent updates, and offer better real-time alerts. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users suggest enhancements in real-time alerts, user-guidance documentation, and a more user-friendly interface. Microsoft Defender requires fewer significant improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VIPRE Endpoint Security receives positive feedback for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is noted for a complex deployment process but offers comprehensive support resources. Users find Microsoft's extensive support network offsets its intricate setup.

Pricing and ROI: VIPRE Endpoint Security is recognized for its competitive pricing and favorable ROI, especially for small to medium-sized businesses. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, perceived as more expensive, provides exceptional ROI due to its robust feature set and extensive protection capabilities. Users find Microsoft Defender worth the higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender for Endp...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

198

Ranking in other categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (3rd), Anti-Malware Tools (1st), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (3rd), Microsoft Security Suite (4th)

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

60th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is 10.0%, down from 13.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VIPRE Endpoint Security is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	10.0%
VIPRE Endpoint Security	0.3%
Other	89.7%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

NaySan @ Suraj Verma

Solution Consultant at BIM Group of Companies

Has effectively blocked sophisticated attacks and malicious activities while providing excellent support

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is very good, but one suggestion is that in some products, we may need to configure security-related settings, whereas Microsoft Defender for Endpoint works completely differently, providing automatic recommendations and actions that we may need to perform ourselves. Regarding the pricing of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, during the last three years, we set up the product and sold it, but we faced difficulties because Microsoft pricing is always the same. For example, whether I purchase Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for one year or for the next three years, the pricing remains constant with no discounts available. In contrast, competing products offer reduced pricing for long-term commitments, which makes it difficult for us in that environment. Microsoft should consider this option to remain competitive, but otherwise, everything else is fine.

Read full review

Shawn S

IT Security Analyst at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees

Easy to upgrade and manage but needs better reporting

There just was a lot about it that I didn't like. For blocking certain items, such as USBs, we felt like it was slowing down the network too much. Therefore we utilized a GPO for blocking things like that instead. Our environment was big and I didn't feel like the console did a good enough job. We outgrew the product. I've been asking for a change for a couple of years now, and it finally got approved. In terms of the console, I had over 2000 endpoints in there and there wasn't even a search feature for me to look through them. If I had to find where a policy was I had to sort in alphabetical order to find an endpoint that I wanted. They need to offer a search function within the console - maybe something that shows a "last connected" notice. That way, it's easier to manage obsolete machines that you don't need anymore. They had a very vague setting, like after so many days, when do you want us to remove these, you'd see them. I just wish the console was a little more responsive when I would do commands. The reports could have been better. The product would show a lot of endpoints as not communicating. That was another pain point. We constantly had to run an SQL query to clean up the database as I would know immediately when I was in the console, that it just wasn't being responsive. I could tell I was being given bad data and that we had to clean up the database. As soon as I would clean up that database, it was like a purging of the SQL database and it would become a lot more responsive. The problem was that our environment was too big. We're going through a growth spurt right now. In the end, the solution is small and much better suited for a small business. We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for. The product is based on an older model of signature files. It doesn't use any artificial intelligence or anything. It was slow to refresh the policies and computer scans. The larger we got, the more it became an issue. If a company stayed small, I'm not sure if they would have noticed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a very go, proactive solution to threat protection using advanced analysis."

"Defender should be fine for home use. It has all the basic functionality you need. I can't speak to how well it works as an enterprise solution because I'm not in the space."

"It's free. There is no additional cost. It's part of Windows."

"You can query and access useful information from logs and events, which is powerful and efficient."

"In my opinion, the most valuable aspects are the reporting analytics and integration with Sentinel. Defender does an excellent job of correlating the different entities that comprise threat analysis, analytics data, and log analytics. It helps to piece together investigations into any exploit or malicious activity within a specific tenant. AI and analytics tools are probably the most valuable components."

"Technical support is good."

"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's most valuable feature is its ease of use."

"The best thing I like about it is its interaction with the other Defender products. It provides the ability to push telemetry up. It gives me endpoint visibility and allows me to take automated actions."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pros

"It has low overhead as far as machine resources are concerned. Everything runs faster with VIPRE installed versus some of the competitors. It has also been pretty easy to use. It just runs and gives us reports. It also sends us alerts when there is something that we need to look at. It does its job, and you just look at the reports. In other ways, you just forget that it is there."

"In general, it was pretty easy to manage."

Cons

"We'd like to see integrations with more vulnerability scanning solutions like Tenable."

"The solution has minimal customization options, especially compared to Mandiant, so we want to see more scope for customization. A single portal for customization would also be a welcome addition."

"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is effective for validating work, but not ideal for investigations."

"The time to generate certain alerts on our dashboard can take between 45 minutes to an hour, and I am unsure of the factors that influence this duration."

"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint could improve by adding more security features."

"I think Microsoft needs to improve some of the security aspects of Defender. The email part, in particular, needs to be improved in terms of security effectiveness."

"On the Mac OS platform, there is no parity between Windows and Mac OS. The solution is very feature-rich and very well-integrated into Windows, and I guess baked into Windows 10 and Windows 11. Whereas, on the Mac OS platform, there is still some work there to give it a more feature-reach platform."

"The price, in general, could always be a little bit cheaper."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint cons

"Their management interface is a little buggy. It requires a few system resources on the management interface. Its reporting can also be better. Overall, the reports are pretty good. They patch some third-party software, but if they can expand what they do for reporting and patch enterprise software, it would be handy."

"We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Defender doesn't cost that much. When you use Microsoft technology, you can start with the free version and see how much the technology helps your organization solve security problems before you use the subscription. They also do this pay-as-you-go model, so you only pay when you use it."

"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint comes with Windows 10, and it's free. But for you to be able to manage it in the cloud and use the console, you need to have either an Office 365 E5 subscription or a Microsoft M365 subscription. You need to buy an extra license."

"Its price is fair. It has approximately the same price as the other products such as Kaspersky. It is much cheaper than Malwarebytes."

"We have an enterprise agreement so from my perspective, this is a product that ships with Windows and it is not priced standalone."

"The solution is an open source version and was free with a paid version of Windows 10."

"We pay a yearly license for Microsoft Defender. We also have a support contract with them."

"They are now doing it on an endpoint basis. It is based on the number of endpoints, which is good."

"The price is higher than others because it is doing more than what the others are doing."

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pricing and cost advice

"Its price point has been phenomenal. Our previous solution from Trend Micro was triple the cost of it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	79
Midsize Enterprise	34
Large Enterprise	87

No data available

Questions from the Community

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface, applies behavioral-based endpoint protection and response, and includes risk-ba...

See all answers

Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?

We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?

The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 5% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 5% of the time

F-Secure Total vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Competitors

Huntress Managed EDR vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 25% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 11% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 9% of the time

Trend Micro ServerProtect vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 9% of the time

More VIPRE Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

August 2025

Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

September 2025

Download VIPRE Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Defender ATP, Microsoft Defender Advanced Threat Protection, MS Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Defender Antivirus

VIPRE Cloud, VIPRE Endpoint Security Cloud Edition, VIPRE Endpoint Security Server Edition

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

VIPRE Security

Overview

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for organizations. It offers real-time protection against various types of cyber threats, including malware, viruses, ransomware, and phishing attacks.

With its powerful machine-learning capabilities, it can detect and block sophisticated attacks before they can cause any harm. The solution also includes endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities, allowing organizations to quickly investigate and respond to security incidents. It provides detailed insights into the attack timeline, enabling security teams to understand the scope and impact of an incident.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint also offers proactive threat hunting, allowing organizations to proactively search for and identify potential threats within their network. It integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft security solutions, such as Microsoft Defender XDR, to provide a unified and holistic security approach. With its centralized management console, organizations can easily deploy, configure, and monitor the security solution across their entire network.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a robust and scalable security solution that helps organizations protect their endpoints and data from evolving cyber threats.

Microsoft

VIPRE Endpoint Security provides fast, powerful and easy-to-manage endpoint protection for businesses of all sizes, with a small footprint that won't slow you down.

VIPRE Security

Sample Customers

Petrofrac, Metro CSG, Christus Health

College Station ISD, Mid-West Companies, Guardian Network Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

September 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.