

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum and CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager compete in endpoint security with each offering unique advantages. Kaspersky excels in simplicity and enterprise-oriented features, while CyberArk shines with advanced privilege management tools.
Features: Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum offers robust endpoint protection with heuristic analysis and centralized management. It includes granular firewall controls and a user-friendly security dashboard. Users value its effectiveness and scalability. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager provides advanced identity services, password vaulting, and session management. It features application whitelisting and Just-In-Time access to enhance security. Users appreciate these for improving endpoint protection and compliance.
Room for Improvement: Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum could improve zero-day exploit protection and adopt advanced threat detection methods. Users note resource-intensive scans and suggest enhancements in web control, vulnerability management, and reporting. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager needs better setup, integration, and user interface consistency. Its high resource consumption and price are concerning, with users desiring simpler setups and improved performance analytics.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions offer on-premises and Public Cloud deployments. Kaspersky benefits from reliable support through local partners and easier deployments, while CyberArk's support, though effective, can be slow, and complex deployments may require partner intervention.
Pricing and ROI: Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum is competitively priced, often cheaper than Symantec, providing good ROI with potential license negotiation based on agent numbers. Conversely, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive with user and session-based pricing. Its comprehensive security justifies the cost for larger enterprises.
Deploying CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has secured the infrastructure, which saves money, time, and resources.
I consider CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager's return on investment to be good since it effectively accomplishes the goals expected from privilege access management solutions.
They respond immediately to our inquiries, resolve issues promptly, and provide valuable guidance, especially in critical situations.
We engage them when needed and receive prompt responses that typically resolve our issues.
Earlier, we received support for normal tickets within a day, but now it takes one or two days to resolve issues.
The technical support from Kaspersky was very responsive.
I would rate technical support from Kaspersky a nine out of ten.
We can set permissions per team or department, allowing some teams to elevate specific applications while others have different permissions.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is quite scalable.
The available reports and other security tools assist in scaling it according to my organization's needs.
Any endpoint added to Active Directory can be detected by Kaspersky Security Center, which can then push the agent onto it.
Both scalability and stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are solid.
It is a robust solution that has effectively supported our environment without major issues.
Since implementing it, we have not experienced any outages or stability issues.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager offers multiple options for creating and stopping policies.
There have been performance issues during scanning, causing the PC to respond slowly.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager could be improved by simplifying the administration process, specifically when setting up policies and applications.
Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console.
Some features provided in the self-hosted version of EPM are not supported in the software as a service version, like connection to some analysis applied by Palo Alto.
Kaspersky needs to improve its security techniques as it has not been in Gartner records for the last two years.
I previously mentioned that Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business doesn't have built-in DLP, which was a concern.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business does not have encryption tools.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is slightly expensive, but costs can be negotiated to become more competitive.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is costly compared to other solutions.
I've received feedback that the pricing is high, however, for me, the value it brings is worth the cost.
The pricing and licensing cost of Kaspersky Endpoint Security is cheaper compared to Trend Micro.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager effectively reduces malicious content in applications by allowing us to identify and block dangerous applications.
It allows them to granularly manage controls to prevent some malicious activities on the endpoint machine.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager enhances computer security by providing minimal access, effectively preventing ransomware attacks.
It stands out as an antivirus and malware protection solution due to its extensive feeds and resources for antivirus signatures.
The best features in Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are the file threat protection, web threat protection, mail threat protection, network threat protection, firewall, behavior detection, and exploit prevention.
The unified endpoint management and the capabilities that are added to the antivirus and anti-malware are what differentiate this solution from others.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business | 16.9% |
| CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager | 11.2% |
| Other | 71.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 63 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 33 |
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.
Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum offers robust protection and user-friendly detection tools beyond endpoints for small to mid-sized businesses, enhancing cybersecurity strategies with essential EDR and seamless XDR integration.
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum unites endpoint protection with automatic response capabilities, allowing businesses to identify, analyze, and neutralize threats efficiently. With features like antivirus, firewall, encryption, centralized management, and robust reporting, it supports multiple platforms and enhances secure environments for computers, servers, and networks. While user satisfaction is high due to its straightforward management and modular capabilities, some desire improvements in performance, AI integration, and cloud compatibility. Enhanced support, training, and simpler updates are also sought, though organizations value its effectiveness against malware and spyware. Despite high pricing and resource demands, Kaspersky's user-friendly approach and integration capabilities remain appreciated.
What are the features of Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum?
What benefits or ROI can users expect?
Organizations rely on Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum for endpoint protection against cyber threats, including malware and ransomware. Deployed across computers, servers, and mobile environments, it allows for centralized manageability, device control, and web access control. This approach ensures comprehensive security updates, file encryption, and efficient network activity monitoring, making it suitable for diverse business implementations.
We monitor all Endpoint Compliance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.