OpenText Functional Testing and Zeenyx AscentialTest compete in the software testing space, focused on automating functional testing tasks. While OpenText offers better pricing and support, Zeenyx's advanced features give it an edge in the market.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing focuses on strong environment integration and is highly compatible with CI/CD pipelines. It supports various applications and technologies effectively. Zeenyx AscentialTest is differentiated by its powerful keyword-driven testing, uncomplicated scripting, and automated regression abilities, which make it highly competitive.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its feature set to match modern testing complexities and improve its intuitive user interfaces. Addressing these could significantly improve user experience. Zeenyx's deployment complexity might be eased with streamlined processes, surmounting initial setup difficulties, and reducing learning curves for new users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing provides flexible deployment with extensive support options, resulting in seamless integration and quick problem resolution. Zeenyx AscentialTest challenges with its more intricate deployment model, but proactive support facilitates thorough guidance and assistance throughout the process.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing, known for competitive setup costs, offers favorable ROI through budget-friendly strategies. Conversely, Zeenyx AscentialTest demands more initial investment but provides substantial ROI by leveraging its advanced capabilities, yielding greater long-term value despite higher upfront costs.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
The best features of OpenText Functional Testing include descriptive programming, the ability to add objects in the repository, and its ease of use for UI compared to other tools.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.5% |
| Zeenyx AscentialTest | 0.3% |
| Other | 91.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
