Corelight vs Lumu comparison

Corelight and Lumu Technologies are both solutions in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category. Corelight is ranked #13, while Lumu Technologies is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0. Corelight holds a 4.1% mindshare in NDaR, compared to Lumu Technologies’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Corelight users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lumu Technologies users who would recommend it.

Corelight

Read 5 Corelight reviews

2,049 Views
1,783 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Lumu

Read 8 Lumu reviews

1,747 Views
1,031 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Corelight

Lumu

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Corelight and Lumu are competing products in the cybersecurity solutions category. Corelight seems to have the upper hand with its advanced features and comprehensive data analysis, while Lumu excels in user-friendly deployment and pricing.

Features: Corelight offers advanced data analysis, real-time threat detection, and integration with threat intelligence feeds. Lumu provides network visibility, incident response capabilities, and simplified packet information display.

Room for Improvement: Corelight could improve its deployment complexity and cost. It may also focus on enhancing user interface simplification. Lumu might benefit from expanding advanced data analysis capabilities, offering more in-depth threat insights, and enhancing customization options for detailed threat monitoring.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Corelight's deployment is more complex but supported with comprehensive guidance, whereas Lumu offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, providing an easy start and efficient support experience.

Pricing and ROI: Corelight has higher setup costs due to its advanced infrastructure needs, appealing to data-centric operations. Lumu's cost-effective pricing is attractive for smaller enterprises, delivering a quick ROI through a lower initial investment and fast results.

To learn more, read our detailed Corelight vs. Lumu Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Corelight vs. Lumu

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,425 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Corelight

Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)

13th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (7th)

Lumu

Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)

6th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (9th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category, the mindshare of Corelight is 4.1%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lumu is 3.2%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Detection and Response (NDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Lumu	3.2%
Corelight	4.1%
Other	92.7%

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

Featured Reviews

HamadaElewa

Technical Sales Manager at Spire Solutions

An expensive solution to monitor internet traffic with multiple dashboards

The huge library especially the open source link, makes it the main engine for Corelight with some enhancements in the commercial version. It has a very powerful level, such as signature-based attacks or behavioral attacks, with enhancements in the design. It is very flexible for intelligent implementations like IPs, especially between big companies and banks. Corelight is easy to understand and monitor what is going on behind the team. The solution is already integrated with other systems like Suricata, Elastic, and Microsoft tools. It's very easy to integrate signature-based or behavior-based engines. You can use Elastic for the dashboards to get it from Corelight, along with all the benefits and expandability.

Read full review

Jeremiah Johnson

Director, Information Technology at a educational organization with 201-500 employees

Constant monitoring and analysis boosts network security

There is always room for improvement. I am not giving it a perfect score because I am sure there is something that could be enhanced.Having some sort of certification or training, along with more periodic webinars might be helpful. Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares. As the community grows for Lumu then that will improve, but that is not really a criticism of Lumu, they simply have not been around that long.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the embedded IDS from Suricata."

"It's an easy way for us to get visibility in a client's environment."

"It's easy to create additional dashboards specific to supporting specific tasks."

"It is easy to deploy and easy to handle."

"Corelight is easy to use."

"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."

"The automated response to incidents works effectively out of the box, and the number of interfaces and platforms it can work with is impressive."

"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."

"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."

"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."

"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."

"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."

Cons

"Corelight hasn’t added features in a long time."

"They can enhance the interface of the product. They can make it more interactive and also easier to use for feature access."

"The solution’s architecture is complex and difficult to understand. There are multiple machines and VMs."

"Machine learning could be a good improvement, but it's very costly."

"In the next release, building a graphical user interface would be helpful."

"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"The free version is minimal compared to the full version."

"Nothing so far needs to be improved."

"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

"Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares."

"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."

"The reports need improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a yearly fee and depends on what you are looking for."

"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."

"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."

"It is the cheapest solution we found."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is the biggest difference between Corelight and Vectra AI?

The two platforms take a fundamentally different approach to NDR. Corelight is limited to use cases that require the eventual forwarding of events and parsed data logs to a security team’s SIEM or ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Corelight?

It's easy to create additional dashboards specific to supporting specific tasks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Corelight?

The solution is too expensive compared to others. If you have the technical knowledge, it's good. Corelight is a very big gap between you and others if you’re new.

See all answers

What do you like most about Lumu?

Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lumu?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lumu?

We use it as our managed SOC instead of contracting with an MSP. It coordinates endpoint and gives us a single pane of glass for our security events.It fulfills the role of a SIEM, serving as our d...

See all answers

Comparisons

Vectra AI vs Corelight

Compared 32% of the time

Darktrace vs Corelight

Compared 25% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Corelight

Compared 19% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Corelight

Compared 7% of the time

NetWitness NDR vs Corelight

Compared 6% of the time

More Corelight Competitors

Darktrace vs Lumu

Compared 36% of the time

Wazuh vs Lumu

Compared 15% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Lumu

Compared 8% of the time

Vectra AI vs Lumu

Compared 8% of the time

More Lumu Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

December 2025

Download Corelight product report

Buyer's Guide

Lumu

December 2025

Download Lumu product report

Overview

Corelight is the most powerful network visibility solution for information security professionals. We provide real-time data that organizations use to understand, detect, and prevent cyber attacks. Our solution is built on Zeek, the powerful and widely-used open source monitoring framework.

Corelight

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Lumu Technologies

Sample Customers

Education First

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Corelight vs. Lumu

December 2025

Free Report: Corelight vs. Lumu

Find out what your peers are saying about Corelight vs. Lumu and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Corelight vs. Lumu report.

See our list of best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors.

We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.