CockroachDB vs Oracle Database In-Memory comparison

Cockroach and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Cockroach is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4, while Oracle is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.2. Cockroach holds a 3.8% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Cockroach users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

CockroachDB

Read 12 CockroachDB reviews

2,677 Views
1,856 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Oracle Database In-Memory

Read 31 Oracle Database In-Memory reviews

992 Views
782 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CockroachDB

Oracle Database In-Memory

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Oracle Database In-Memory and CockroachDB compete in the database management systems category. Oracle Database In-Memory seems to have the upper hand in performance and security features, while CockroachDB excels in fault tolerance and ease of use for cloud environments.

Features: Oracle Database In-Memory offers real-time processing capabilities, Advanced Security Option, and Database Vault for enhanced security. It improves performance in data-intensive tasks, ideal for data warehousing and analytics. CockroachDB is noted for high fault tolerance, geo-partitioning capabilities, and easy setup, making it suitable for distributed architectures and data residency compliance.

Room for Improvement: Oracle needs to simplify analytics workloads, enhance security features for cloud environments, and reduce setup complexity. There is also a desire for lowered costs. CockroachDB could improve its compatibility with Postgres, refine disaster recovery features, and simplify initial setup complexity. Both systems could benefit from scaling enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Database In-Memory is commonly deployed in Private, Hybrid, and On-premises environments, offering diverse deployment flexibility. Users have mixed reviews on customer service, highlighting availability but noting inconsistent resolutions. CockroachDB is used broadly in Public Cloud deployments, offering seamless cloud-based setups. However, its technical support is seen as insufficient for complex challenges, indicating a need for improved customer service frameworks.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Database In-Memory is considered a high-cost product with substantial licensing costs, pricier compared to rivals like Microsoft, yet users report a good ROI due to performance benefits. CockroachDB offers cost-effective options, notably with its open-source version, allowing businesses to experiment without major expenses. Users find its pricing flexible and the performance justifying the cost. Both products report an 80% ROI, highlighting the cost-performance benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database In-Memory Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database In-Memory

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CockroachDB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Database In-Memory

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Embedded Database (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of CockroachDB is 3.8%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database In-Memory is 1.6%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Antonio Tringali

Software Engineer at a consultancy with self employed

Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training

I am a freelancer. A client of mine wanted a solution that would allow them to scale yet not abandon the familiar PostgreSQL front-end (and rewrite a part of their source code). Scalability aside, CockroachDB is a fine way forward from PostgreSQL and is not changing the client source code part of the system. If you are lucky and you do not use newer features from recent versions of PostgreSQL or PostgreSQL extensions, it's fine. There are nice-to-have features for big organizations like regional tables. At the moment, my client simply does not use these. However, the serverless offer from CockroachDB is reacting well as data grows.

Read full review

Laksiri Bala

DB Architect / Consultant at Virtusa Global

Faster processing and improved memory operations have enhanced transaction and analytics efficiency

The valuable features of Oracle Database In-Memory ( /products/oracle-database-in-memory-reviews ) include its capability to bypass disk storage for faster memory operations, which is critical for transactions and analytics. It also offers specific memory areas, like in-memory cache, that act as intermediaries between disk and buffer cache. This feature helps organizations handle real-time memory requirements effectively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that CockroachDB is a distributed database, which can deploy nodes running in different regions."

"The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported."

"What I like best is its ability to solve data residency issues. The main advantage is auto geo partitioning, built into the product. This means we don't have to spin up separate servers in each region, which would be much more costly."

"The initial setup and deployment are simple."

"The availability and the easy to use feature is the most valuable. The documentation is also good."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities."

"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds."

"The product has valuable security features."

More CockroachDB pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is its performance optimization within our hardware environment."

"Normally, every database server uses hard disks. In-Memory has a feature, apart from their database, which is very good. When we start our server, all your data needs loading memory. We can use that. It's a very good feature. I think they added this feature in 2019. We can mount memory in the partition, create partitions in there, and create table space from that spot to share. It's a really good feature. We use it a lot."

"I find the performance features of Oracle Database In-Memory to be most beneficial."

"The scalability is very good."

"I like Oracle because it is a backward-compatible solution."

"The application development is very user-friendly."

"The product offers high scalability."

"The on-premise version is stable. We have different teams and resources for the server side, for admin, and for development. We can easily take care of all the services and applications."

More Oracle Database In-Memory pros

Cons

"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."

"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."

"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."

"The platform could be more extensible."

"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."

"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."

"I think the engine itself could be improved. If you miss a partition key, it should be able to be modeled. This is where AI could be really helpful. For example, if a user is from Australia, the system should know to look for their data there first instead of searching in the US or another continent."

"I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations."

More CockroachDB cons

"I would like Oracle Database In-Memory to include a data replication feature."

"Technical support is below our expectations currently. It could be improved."

"We use some partitions in In-Memory. We have a very large table and a low dose. It is very expensive in data to load all of them into In-Memory. It takes up more memory slots in the server, as well as a lot of RAM. We use last partitions on the table. We always need to create a script and make a schedule that can load a last partition in In-Memory. Oracle doesn't have features to do this automatically. I would like them to allow us to load last partitions, as well as other table partitions, in In-Memory. I think a good feature would do that automatically, letting you see a table, load a large partition, and monitor loading memory. It's quite a good feature."

"The solution should move to the new way of writing software code with AI that is intelligent and learns."

"Lacks sufficient integration with other tools."

"Oracle should include column store or advanced query optimization so a database can be optimized by enabling analytic queries to run faster."

"The product could be more economical."

"Oracle Database In-Memory could improve by better supporting generative AI challenges, such as hallucination management."

More Oracle Database In-Memory cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's price depends on the user's company and the contract model they enter into with CockroachDB. Depending on the contract model one enters into with CockroachDB, the product may or may not be expensive."

"The platform is affordable even for the enterprise version. It provides value for investment in terms of performance."

"I've used CockroachDB at a small scale on the free accounts because we are only testing."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap. However, the good thing is that customers are willing to pay for it if they want it."

"The pricing is good but can be made cheaper. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The pricing is pretty good so I rate it an eight out of ten."

"There is a need to make a yearly payment towards the licensing costs, after which there is any to pay towards the support cost attached to the solution."

"Database In-Memory is priced a bit higher than its competitors like Microsoft."

"The solution's pricing is high."

"The platform's licensing cost needs improvement."

"The product is expensive."

"Oracle Database In-Memory is expensive."

"It's quite costly and it comes with a fixed price."

More Oracle Database In-Memory pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

37%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CockroachDB?

The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CockroachDB?

I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CockroachDB?

I am studying how to deploy CockroachDB and YugaByteDB, and learning some basic information about them. I am testing these databases as part of my school application to find a suitable database for...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Database In-Memory?

We can integrate it with any data sources as well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database In-Memory?

Pricing is justified by the performance and business value offered by Oracle Database In-Memory. Although slightly higher, recent reductions in cloud costs and learning opportunities, such as free ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database In-Memory?

Oracle Database In-Memory could improve by better supporting generative AI challenges, such as hallucination management. Enhancing features like CAG augmentation and cache augmentation could signif...

See all answers

Comparisons

Neon vs CockroachDB

Compared 22% of the time

Citus Data vs CockroachDB

Compared 16% of the time

YugabyteDB vs CockroachDB

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Database vs CockroachDB

Compared 10% of the time

MySQL vs CockroachDB

Compared 9% of the time

More CockroachDB Competitors

SAP HANA vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 26% of the time

SQL Server vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 15% of the time

DuckDB vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 13% of the time

Progress OpenEdge RDBMS vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Database In-Memory Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB

April 2025

Download CockroachDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Database In-Memory

April 2025

Download Oracle Database In-Memory product report

Overview

CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built on a transactional and strongly-consistent key-value store. It scales horizontally; survives disk, machine, rack, and even datacenter failures with minimal latency disruption and no manual intervention; supports strongly-consistent ACID transactions; and provides a familiar SQL API for structuring, manipulating, and querying data.

CockroachDB is inspired by Google’s Spanner and F1 technologies, and it’s completely open source.

Cockroach

Oracle Database In-Memory transparently accelerates analytics by orders of magnitude while simultaneously speeding up mixed-workload OLTP. With Oracle Database In-Memory, users get immediate answers to business questions that previously took hours.

Oracle Database In-Memory delivers leading-edge in-memory performance without the need to restrict functionality, or accept compromises, complexity and risk. Deploying Oracle Database In-Memory with any existing Oracle Database compatible application is as easy as flipping a switch - no application changes are required. Oracle Database In-Memory is fully integrated with the Oracle Database’s renowned scale-up, scale-out, storage tiering, availability, and security technologies making it the most industrialstrength offering on the market.

The ability to easily perform real-time data analysis together with real-time transaction processing on all existing applications enables organizations to transform into Real-Time Enterprises that quickly make data-driven decisions, respond instantly to customer demands, and continuously optimize all key processes.

For more information on Oracle Database In-Memory, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias

Shanghai Customs

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database In-Memory

April 2025

Free Report: CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database In-Memory

Find out what your peers are saying about CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database In-Memory and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database In-Memory report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.