Cisco UCS Manager vs LiveNX comparison

Cisco and BlueCat are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.8, while BlueCat is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.3. Cisco holds a 1.3% mindshare in IM, compared to BlueCat’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of BlueCat users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Manager

Read 27 Cisco UCS Manager reviews

4,060 Views
3,776 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

LiveNX

Read 10 LiveNX reviews

4,801 Views
2,256 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

LiveNX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

LiveNX and Cisco UCS Manager are two products in the network performance and infrastructure management space. LiveNX appears to lead in pricing and support, whereas Cisco UCS Manager's comprehensive feature set gives it an edge for those seeking a robust infrastructure management solution.

Features: LiveNX emphasizes real-time network performance monitoring, analytics for optimized traffic management, and visual dashboards for deep insights. Cisco UCS Manager focuses on integrated infrastructure management, offering hardware provisioning, simplified operations, and high scalability.

Room for Improvement: LiveNX could enhance its integration capabilities with other IT systems and improve its scalability to handle larger networks. More comprehensive reporting tools could also provide added value. Cisco UCS Manager would benefit from simplifying its setup process, reducing dependency on extensive documentation, and enhancing its user interface for easier navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveNX is straightforward to deploy with a focus on excellent customer service, aiding quick adoption. Though Cisco UCS Manager’s setup is complex, its detailed documentation and active community support play a significant role in customer satisfaction during deployment for larger systems.

Pricing and ROI: LiveNX offers competitive pricing with efficient performance monitoring tools that provide substantial ROI by reducing operational costs. Cisco UCS Manager entails a higher initial cost but promises ROI through infrastructure automation and reduced administrative burdens, appealing to organizations requiring comprehensive infrastructure management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

LiveNX

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

39th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (35th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiveNX is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco UCS Manager	1.3%
LiveNX	0.9%
Other	97.8%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Rob-Croxford

Consultant at rcnss

A market leader with an enhanced user interface for seamless experience

There is room for improvement in terms of cost and complexity to set up. It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing. Some settings are still fairly well hidden, even the basic ones. Companies don't really understand how long it takes to set up. Also, when changes are pushed, it can take their phone line off the system for twenty minutes to half an hour. Out-of-the-box functionality is an issue, too. I know that my company is different, however, the basics are always the same. You do your tap lines, zip lines, and stuff like that, then you get your internal phone line system. That can all be automated and scripted, and it's probably part of the automation process. However, I haven't really seen it.

Read full review

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Collaboration and network optimization become more effective with detailed feedback

The customers use LiveAction LiveNX for network monitoring and management purposes LiveAction LiveNX provides valuable real-time and historical network traffic visualization capabilities that help monitor and analyze network performance. The solution could be enhanced by implementing custom…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can deploy something in my 50-odd servers all in one go, in parallel, whereas if I was to do that individually, it could be a nightmare."

"Cisco Infrastructure is one of the top vendors and no one can beat them in terms of switching and routing."

"Ease of management is certainly the most valuable feature in this product."

"For the blade architecture and ease of use, I consider Cisco UCS Manager the best option on the market at the moment."

"Cisco is globally renowned, which is why it sells so well."

"It is more robust than other solutions. So, the stability is good."

"If I had to choose between other submissions, I would choose the Cisco UCS every time."

"What I like most about Cisco UCS Manager is the ease of administration. It also allows the central management of maintenance, installation, and configuration activities."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

"On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine."

"Its analytical capability is really good."

"There are many positive attributes, and it's the best of the best."

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."

"The product has a very good graphical interface."

"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

"It is very good if you are a Cisco shop; it gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning."

More LiveNX pros

Cons

"What's lacking in Cisco UCS Manager is the performance dashboard. If a blade has any performance issues, you should be able to create a dashboard on Cisco UCS Manager. Currently, this feature isn't present."

"The interface and the way it is constructed is very complex. They should work to simplify it. It's quite difficult for somebody who doesn't know the product very well. Users should be able to get proficient with it faster. There's definitely room for improvement there."

"For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks."

"Its user interface can be improved. It can be more user-friendly."

"The automation within the solution needs to be simplified."

"The integration with other solutions could be better. I think Cisco can only integrate using Intersight. There is a second interface available as a SaaS platform, in the cloud, or on-premise. It's based on the Redfish protocol, which is standard for all the B-series servers in the market. We can integrate other solutions using API."

"The interface and the way it is constructed is very complex. They should work to simplify it."

"The licensing cost for Cisco UCS Manager is around four out of ten. It is not cost-effective due to its high price, especially regarding memory expansion."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

"The only downside to this software is the price."

"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."

"Maintenance is required for the system."

"They have some unique functionality but they need to create a more simplified UI."

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions."

More LiveNX cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

"It's very expensive."

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

"We use the free version."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

My experience with the pricing of Cisco UCS Manager ( /products/cisco-ucs-manager-reviews ) is that it is reasonable. Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks. While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco UCS Manager?

Our primary use case involves working with Cisco UCS B-Series ( /products/cisco-ucs-b-series-reviews ), specifically the UCS X modular deployment. We are setting up a new deployment shortly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The solution could be enhanced by implementing custom patterns for each customer.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

The customers use LiveAction LiveNX for network monitoring and management purposes.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering LiveAction LiveNX?

I work as an integrator with LiveAction LiveNX. Most customers prefer deploying it on premises rather than in the cloud. The advanced diagnostics capabilities, including flow-based surveillance and...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 56% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveNX

Compared 7% of the time

Nmap vs LiveNX

Compared 6% of the time

ThousandEyes vs LiveNX

Compared 4% of the time

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs LiveNX

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs LiveNX

Compared 3% of the time

More LiveNX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager

June 2026

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

LiveNX

June 2026

Download LiveNX product report

Also Known As

No data available

LiveNX

Overview

Cisco UCS Manager enables streamlined operations through unified storage, networking, and computing management, offering enhanced reliability and flexibility.

Cisco UCS Manager provides enhanced management capabilities for infrastructures, simplifying server deployment and operations. Its user-friendly interface aids in easy configuration and visibility, including robust reporting. UCS Manager supports efficient firmware and OS updates for large deployments, ensuring smooth operations across physical and virtual environments.

What key features does Cisco UCS Manager offer?

Hardware Profile Association: Ensures seamless hardware configurations.
Unified Management: Centralizes control of storage, networking, and computing resources.
Service Profiles: Simplifies server deployment and management.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Provides intuitive interface and strong reporting.
High Availability: Facilitates resource expansion and stability.

What benefits are important when considering Cisco UCS Manager?

Operational Efficiency: Reduces downtime and enhances deployment speed.
Centralized Control: Streamlines management across blades and configurations.
Scalability: Supports mass deployments and expansion.
Visibility and Reporting: Improves infrastructure monitoring and analytics.

In industries managing extensive IT infrastructures, such as healthcare and finance, Cisco UCS Manager is crucial for optimizing server and network operations. It enables efficient creation of server profiles, integration with networking systems, and comprehensive monitoring, ensuring high availability and reduced setup time for complex environments.

Cisco

LiveNX enables real-time network monitoring with a graphical interface, offering detailed reports and advanced integration for comprehensive analysis and efficient network management.

LiveNX provides intuitive tools for real-time issue identification and resolution, leveraging advanced integration with platforms like Cisco SD-WAN to enhance network performance analysis. Through features such as visual analytics and QoS modeling, LiveNX supports capacity management planning and operational efficiency, although it requires improvements in pricing, resource efficiency, and web interface functionality. Users value its insights into traffic patterns, enabling optimization and proactive issue resolution.

What are the key features of LiveNX?

Real-Time Monitoring: Facilitates immediate issue identification.
Graphical Interface: Enhances user experience with detailed visualization.
Integration Capabilities: Supports platforms like Cisco SD-WAN for comprehensive analysis.
Visual Analytics: Provides insights into traffic patterns.
QoS Modeling: Aids in planning and maintaining service quality.
Custom Templates: Offers personalized network management tools.

What benefits should users look for?

Proactive Issue Resolution: Enables early detection and solving of network problems.
Comprehensive Analysis: Assists in understanding and managing network performance.
Operational Efficiency: Enhances overall network management processes.
Traffic Optimization: Improves service quality and network utilization.

Industries use LiveNX to monitor and troubleshoot network performance, manage traffic, and ensure QoS across on-premises and cloud environments. It is particularly valued for its ability to visualize and optimize network traffic, which is crucial for maintaining service quality.

BlueCat

Sample Customers

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX

June 2026

Free Report: Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.