Cisco UCS Manager vs LiveNX comparison

Cisco and BlueCat are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.8, while BlueCat is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.3. Cisco holds a 1.3% mindshare in IM, compared to BlueCat’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of BlueCat users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Manager

Read 27 Cisco UCS Manager reviews

2,456 Views
2,260 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

LiveNX

Read 10 LiveNX reviews

2,996 Views
1,288 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

LiveNX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

LiveNX and Cisco UCS Manager are two products in the network performance and infrastructure management space. LiveNX appears to lead in pricing and support, whereas Cisco UCS Manager's comprehensive feature set gives it an edge for those seeking a robust infrastructure management solution.

Features: LiveNX emphasizes real-time network performance monitoring, analytics for optimized traffic management, and visual dashboards for deep insights. Cisco UCS Manager focuses on integrated infrastructure management, offering hardware provisioning, simplified operations, and high scalability.

Room for Improvement: LiveNX could enhance its integration capabilities with other IT systems and improve its scalability to handle larger networks. More comprehensive reporting tools could also provide added value. Cisco UCS Manager would benefit from simplifying its setup process, reducing dependency on extensive documentation, and enhancing its user interface for easier navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveNX is straightforward to deploy with a focus on excellent customer service, aiding quick adoption. Though Cisco UCS Manager’s setup is complex, its detailed documentation and active community support play a significant role in customer satisfaction during deployment for larger systems.

Pricing and ROI: LiveNX offers competitive pricing with efficient performance monitoring tools that provide substantial ROI by reducing operational costs. Cisco UCS Manager entails a higher initial cost but promises ROI through infrastructure automation and reduced administrative burdens, appealing to organizations requiring comprehensive infrastructure management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,667 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

LiveNX

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

40th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiveNX is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco UCS Manager	1.3%
LiveNX	0.9%
Other	97.8%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Rob-Croxford

Consultant at rcnss

A market leader with an enhanced user interface for seamless experience

There is room for improvement in terms of cost and complexity to set up. It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing. Some settings are still fairly well hidden, even the basic ones. Companies don't really understand how long it takes to set up. Also, when changes are pushed, it can take their phone line off the system for twenty minutes to half an hour. Out-of-the-box functionality is an issue, too. I know that my company is different, however, the basics are always the same. You do your tap lines, zip lines, and stuff like that, then you get your internal phone line system. That can all be automated and scripted, and it's probably part of the automation process. However, I haven't really seen it.

Read full review

Ashwani Bansal

Senior Solution Consultant at Orange

Network management and diagnostics improved through effective monitoring and reporting capabilities

The solution is handy. I have not used that particular feature. Maintenance is required for the system. If you want to use something on the endpoints or end-user devices, then using LiveAction LiveNX in place of other tools would be quite beneficial. The solution impacts operational costs and resources. On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Technical support has been good so far. We haven't had any issues with them. We're satisfied with the level of service they provide our company."

"The management is one of the most valuable features of this solution."

"From a usability and functionality perspective, Cisco UCS Manager is very good."

"Usually, we are called by clients specifically about product suggestions, and I often personally recommend Cisco UCS because of the high availability."

"Cisco is globally renowned, which is why it sells so well."

"The most valuable features of Cisco UCS Manager include the visibility it provides and the ease of identifying issues within the Cisco environment."

"The hardware is very powerful and it is a stable solution."

"Cisco Infrastructure is one of the top vendors and no one can beat them in terms of switching and routing."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

"It is very good if you are a Cisco shop; it gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning."

"On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine."

"There are many positive attributes, and it's the best of the best."

"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great, but it is far, far away from good and perfect."

"The product has a very good graphical interface."

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."

"If you're looking for a tool that will solve your problems in a short period of time more effectively, LiveNX is the right tool."

More LiveNX pros

Cons

"The primary challenge we face is identifying the correct version to deploy during firmware upgrades or compute updates."

"We have three data centers and if we could manage all three data centers using one interface, it would be great."

"During the firmware upgrades, we would definitely need to take downtime in some cases and the downtime would take too long."

"Its user interface can be improved. It can be more user-friendly."

"We have three data centers and if we could manage all three data centers using one interface, it would be great."

"The solution's pricing is high and could be reduced."

"The interface and the way it is constructed is very complex. They should work to simplify it."

"What's lacking in Cisco UCS Manager is the performance dashboard. If a blade has any performance issues, you should be able to create a dashboard on Cisco UCS Manager. Currently, this feature isn't present."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

"My advice to others would be to run away from it. This is a slight exaggeration but this is more because the application is horrible, the stability is horrible, the performance is horrible and the support is horrible."

"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions."

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."

"They need to create a more simplified UI."

"They have some unique functionality but they need to create a more simplified UI."

"The only downside to this software is the price; it's a very pricey solution and very expensive, and it requires a good amount of resources in terms of server memory."

More LiveNX cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

"We use the free version."

"It's very expensive."

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?

When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

My experience with the pricing of Cisco UCS Manager ( /products/cisco-ucs-manager-reviews ) is that it is reasonable. Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks. While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The solution could be enhanced by implementing custom patterns for each customer.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

The customers use LiveAction LiveNX for network monitoring and management purposes.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering LiveAction LiveNX?

I work as an integrator with LiveAction LiveNX. Most customers prefer deploying it on premises rather than in the cloud. The advanced diagnostics capabilities, including flow-based surveillance and...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 57% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 5% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 3% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveNX

Compared 7% of the time

Nmap vs LiveNX

Compared 6% of the time

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs LiveNX

Compared 5% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveNX

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs LiveNX

Compared 4% of the time

More LiveNX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager

March 2026

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

LiveNX

March 2026

Download LiveNX product report

Also Known As

No data available

LiveNX

Overview

Cisco UCS Manager helps significantly reduce management and administration expenses by automating routine tasks to increase operational agility. Customers can extend the benefits of Cisco UCS Manager globally across an enterprise to thousands of servers in multiple domains with Cisco UCS Central Software.

Cisco

LiveNX enables real-time network monitoring with a graphical interface, offering detailed reports and advanced integration for comprehensive analysis and efficient network management.

LiveNX provides intuitive tools for real-time issue identification and resolution, leveraging advanced integration with platforms like Cisco SD-WAN to enhance network performance analysis. Through features such as visual analytics and QoS modeling, LiveNX supports capacity management planning and operational efficiency, although it requires improvements in pricing, resource efficiency, and web interface functionality. Users value its insights into traffic patterns, enabling optimization and proactive issue resolution.

What are the key features of LiveNX?

Real-Time Monitoring: Facilitates immediate issue identification.
Graphical Interface: Enhances user experience with detailed visualization.
Integration Capabilities: Supports platforms like Cisco SD-WAN for comprehensive analysis.
Visual Analytics: Provides insights into traffic patterns.
QoS Modeling: Aids in planning and maintaining service quality.
Custom Templates: Offers personalized network management tools.

What benefits should users look for?

Proactive Issue Resolution: Enables early detection and solving of network problems.
Comprehensive Analysis: Assists in understanding and managing network performance.
Operational Efficiency: Enhances overall network management processes.
Traffic Optimization: Improves service quality and network utilization.

Industries use LiveNX to monitor and troubleshoot network performance, manage traffic, and ensure QoS across on-premises and cloud environments. It is particularly valued for its ability to visualize and optimize network traffic, which is crucial for maintaining service quality.

BlueCat

Sample Customers

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX

March 2026

Free Report: Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.