Cisco UCS Manager vs LiveNX comparison

Cisco and BlueCat are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.8, while BlueCat is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.3. Cisco holds a 1.3% mindshare in IM, compared to BlueCat’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of BlueCat users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Manager

Read 27 Cisco UCS Manager reviews

2,065 Views
1,859 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

LiveNX

Read 10 LiveNX reviews

2,414 Views
1,014 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

LiveNX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 26, 2025

LiveNX and Cisco UCS Manager compete in the network management and infrastructure category. LiveNX offers superior real-time network performance monitoring, while Cisco UCS Manager provides robust server and storage infrastructure management.

Features: LiveNX provides comprehensive network performance monitoring, real-time insights, and data analytics. It delivers visual analytics for bandwidth optimization, alerting systems for timely network anomaly detection, and real-time monitoring to minimize downtime. Cisco UCS Manager offers unified management for server and storage resources, simplifying deployments with service profiles, enabling easy firmware patch updates, and providing extensive scalability options for enterprise environments.

Room for Improvement: LiveNX could enhance its ease of using the platform for users unfamiliar with sophisticated network tools. Improving API integration for non-Cisco environments may also increase its utility. Adding more advanced predictive analytics could better support proactive network management. Cisco UCS Manager could benefit from a more streamlined setup process. Increasing compatibility with non-Cisco hardware could broaden its application. Enhancing user interface intuitiveness may also make administration tasks more straightforward.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveNX is known for its straightforward deployment process and excellent customer support, facilitating seamless setup and effective troubleshooting. Cisco UCS Manager, with its extensive infrastructure capabilities, relies on comprehensive documentation and a broad support network, guiding users through the more complex deployment procedures.

Pricing and ROI: LiveNX generally offers a lower upfront cost, providing quicker ROI through effective network performance tools. Cisco UCS Manager, while requiring a higher initial investment, yields considerable ROI through its extensive management of server and storage capabilities, making it ideal for enterprises seeking expansive infrastructure control.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,685 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

LiveNX

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

39th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (35th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.3%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiveNX is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco UCS Manager	1.3%
LiveNX	0.9%
Other	97.8%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Rob-Croxford

Consultant at rcnss

A market leader with an enhanced user interface for seamless experience

There is room for improvement in terms of cost and complexity to set up. It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing. Some settings are still fairly well hidden, even the basic ones. Companies don't really understand how long it takes to set up. Also, when changes are pushed, it can take their phone line off the system for twenty minutes to half an hour. Out-of-the-box functionality is an issue, too. I know that my company is different, however, the basics are always the same. You do your tap lines, zip lines, and stuff like that, then you get your internal phone line system. That can all be automated and scripted, and it's probably part of the automation process. However, I haven't really seen it.

Read full review

Ashwani Bansal

Senior Solution Consultant at Orange

Network management and diagnostics improved through effective monitoring and reporting capabilities

The solution is handy. I have not used that particular feature. Maintenance is required for the system. If you want to use something on the endpoints or end-user devices, then using LiveAction LiveNX in place of other tools would be quite beneficial. The solution impacts operational costs and resources. On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time."

"A main feature of Cisco UCS Manager is its reliability, as all of the computing blades are in cluster mode."

"Cisco UCS Manager is recommended for its ease of deployment and management capabilities."

"The management is one of the most valuable features of this solution."

"Creating UCS service profiles for quickly deploying servers and replicating that configuration to another server makes it easier for deployment."

"I can deploy something in my 50-odd servers all in one go, in parallel, whereas if I was to do that individually, it could be a nightmare."

"Ease of management is certainly the most valuable feature in this product."

"It is more robust than other solutions. So, the stability is good."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

"The product has a very good graphical interface."

"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."

"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."

"Its analytical capability is really good."

"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."

More LiveNX pros

Cons

"The solution's pricing is high and could be reduced."

"Improving functionalities similar to InterSite within UCS Manager would be beneficial."

"I found it a bit of a challenge to get training on UCSM. I've been trying to get that for some time now. I feel like I have to figure it out a lot of things myself. For years I've to log calls with support whenever I've got challenges that I cannot resolve. If I had some training or more manuals, I'd be better able to handle more things on my own."

"I want to be able to schedule multiple sequential updates in one go."

"I would like to see Cisco UCS optionally work as a hyper-converged system because right now, it only operates as a converged system."

"For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks."

"Upgrading the firmware is a difficult procedure."

"I would like to see improved visibility into the operating system, enabling us to identify issues directly from the operating system itself."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."

"The customer service and technical support of LiveAction LiveNX are rated at 4 out of 10."

"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."

"Maintenance is required for the system."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."

"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

More LiveNX cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

"It's very expensive."

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

"We use the free version."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?

When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

My experience with the pricing of Cisco UCS Manager ( /products/cisco-ucs-manager-reviews ) is that it is reasonable. Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks. While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The solution could be enhanced by implementing custom patterns for each customer.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

The customers use LiveAction LiveNX for network monitoring and management purposes.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering LiveAction LiveNX?

I work as an integrator with LiveAction LiveNX. Most customers prefer deploying it on premises rather than in the cloud. The advanced diagnostics capabilities, including flow-based surveillance and...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 64% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 5% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveNX

Compared 10% of the time

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs LiveNX

Compared 8% of the time

Nmap vs LiveNX

Compared 6% of the time

ThousandEyes vs LiveNX

Compared 5% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveNX

Compared 5% of the time

More LiveNX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager

January 2026

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

LiveNX

January 2026

Download LiveNX product report

Also Known As

No data available

LiveNX

Overview

Cisco UCS Manager helps significantly reduce management and administration expenses by automating routine tasks to increase operational agility. Customers can extend the benefits of Cisco UCS Manager globally across an enterprise to thousands of servers in multiple domains with Cisco UCS Central Software.

Cisco

LiveNX enables real-time network monitoring with a graphical interface, offering detailed reports and advanced integration for comprehensive analysis and efficient network management.

LiveNX provides intuitive tools for real-time issue identification and resolution, leveraging advanced integration with platforms like Cisco SD-WAN to enhance network performance analysis. Through features such as visual analytics and QoS modeling, LiveNX supports capacity management planning and operational efficiency, although it requires improvements in pricing, resource efficiency, and web interface functionality. Users value its insights into traffic patterns, enabling optimization and proactive issue resolution.

What are the key features of LiveNX?

Real-Time Monitoring: Facilitates immediate issue identification.
Graphical Interface: Enhances user experience with detailed visualization.
Integration Capabilities: Supports platforms like Cisco SD-WAN for comprehensive analysis.
Visual Analytics: Provides insights into traffic patterns.
QoS Modeling: Aids in planning and maintaining service quality.
Custom Templates: Offers personalized network management tools.

What benefits should users look for?

Proactive Issue Resolution: Enables early detection and solving of network problems.
Comprehensive Analysis: Assists in understanding and managing network performance.
Operational Efficiency: Enhances overall network management processes.
Traffic Optimization: Improves service quality and network utilization.

Industries use LiveNX to monitor and troubleshoot network performance, manage traffic, and ensure QoS across on-premises and cloud environments. It is particularly valued for its ability to visualize and optimize network traffic, which is crucial for maintaining service quality.

BlueCat

Sample Customers

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX

January 2026

Free Report: Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Manager vs. LiveNX report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.