Cisco UCS Director vs HPE Eucalyptus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
899 views|706 comparisons
69% willing to recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
389 views|181 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS Director and HPE Eucalyptus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
HiranthaWijayawardena
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is helpful for centralized management.""An easy and strong configuration, along with its low cost, are some of the features of the solution.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the fabric sharing.""Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""Feature-wise, the solution helps one to add multiple environments in one place...It is a scalable product.""The product is flexible and compact. It has a lot of features.""The main feature of this solution is the integration with all the Cisco solutions and other vendors.""A product that really aids in systems management without complexity."

More Cisco UCS Director Pros →

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the interface on the console."

More HPE Eucalyptus Pros →

Cons
"The areas where this product can be improved are the integrations and the UI. These features are not as friendly compared to VMware products.""Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems.""The tool should be a lot more intuitive and make it easy for us to understand and migrate.""It is not easy to add or expand the product.""The product could allow more programmatic opportunities through better development of the API.""There could be an improvement with the integration with the newest solutions from other vendors' technologies.""Currently, Cisco UCS Director is unable to integrate with another product or with a server from another brand.""I would like to see more integration with other solutions."

More Cisco UCS Director Cons →

"The customization should be improved."

More HPE Eucalyptus Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost of this solution is significant."
  • "Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."
  • "The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."
  • "I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."
  • More Cisco UCS Director Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product… more »
    Top Answer:Currently, Cisco UCS Director is unable to integrate with another product or with a server from another brand. If Cisco UCS Director is able to integrate with another product or with a server from… more »
    Top Answer:The best cloud platform for your organization will depend on specific needs and requirements, but below are the advantages and disadvantages of VMware vSphere, Rackspace OpenStack, and HPE Eucalyptus… more »
    Ranking
    23rd
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    899
    Comparisons
    706
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    404
    Rating
    6.4
    38th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    389
    Comparisons
    181
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Eucalyptus, HP Eucalyptus
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

    HP Eucalyptus helps customers grow revenue and stay ahead of competition by enabling developers to get the IT resources they need in seconds, not days. Its unique AWS compatibility ensures applications are easily deployed in private, public or hybrid cloud environments.
    Sample Customers
    Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge
    Mosaik Solutions, Nava Solutions
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Energy/Utilities Company25%
    Retailer13%
    Government13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Government11%
    Healthcare Company8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise69%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco UCS Director is ranked 23rd in Cloud Management with 13 reviews while HPE Eucalyptus is ranked 38th in Cloud Management. Cisco UCS Director is rated 7.2, while HPE Eucalyptus is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS Director writes "A compact and flexible solution with a lot of features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Eucalyptus writes "Good interface, and an easy initial setup with good community support on the free version". Cisco UCS Director is most compared with Cisco Intersight, VMware Aria Automation, vCenter Orchestrator, VMware Aria Operations and Cisco CloudCenter, whereas HPE Eucalyptus is most compared with OpenNebula.

    See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.