No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE NonStop comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS B-Series
Ranking in Blade Servers
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
74
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
HPE NonStop
Ranking in Blade Servers
12th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS B-Series is 7.3%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE NonStop is 4.8%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Blade Servers Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Cisco UCS B-Series7.3%
HPE NonStop4.8%
Other87.9%
Blade Servers
 

Featured Reviews

MB
Head of IT Operations at NCC BANK LIMITED
Efficient server management reduces costs and supports seamless operations
Cisco UCS B-Series has reliably sustained smooth operations without the need for significant maintenance. Its administration capabilities provide easy access to performance reports, logs, and utilization data, which are essential for effective server management. Additionally, the integration capabilities are seamless, and the power consumption and heat generation are low, resulting in reduced cooling costs and increased financial benefits.
Roni Wijaya - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President of It Operations at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
With a perfect record for uptime, the solution ensures a return on investment
Since it is a legacy tool, there is a need to change it for flexibility. I think now it has improved because the security is very good. It is very secure for the performance of the machine critical application service, and it is very good. I don't know how to speak more on improvement needed because it's a good enough tool. However, depending on the application, it's limited. Not a lot of applications run on HPE NonStop. It is not flexible because I know that because of the compatibility of Java with HPE NonStop. When we are using Java, the performance is not good.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the service profile."
"With Cisco UCS, we became network-centric and changed our mindset to abstract the server, making it a stateless object for workloads."
"The versatility of the solution is the most helpful to us."
"I can recommend the solution wholeheartedly to other organizations."
"It's faster to provision virtual servers than physical, and it has very good orchestration with UCS Director 5.2."
"The scalability is very good."
"The Boot from SAN function is good because using OTV, we can boot the device from any remote location."
"Great security and functionality."
"They've been very reliable since we started using them in 1978, but we're going to replace them in a few years."
"The stability of HPE NonStop is good."
"It helps us to keep the business running 24/7."
"If you are contemplating a fault-tolerant, high uptime transaction processing machine with above normal transactions volumes - to act as a transaction server with infrequent changes to code - and you simply must have bulletproof performance - this might be the ticket."
"The HPE NonStop solution is rated with the highest level of availability in the industry."
"We don't have any issues with the stability of HPE NonStop."
"We don't have any issues with the stability of HPE NonStop."
"This is the standard for reliability and fault-resilience."
 

Cons

"The GUI is not the greatest."
"The price of this product is too high. They should work to make it more affordable."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved and made cheaper."
"The aggregation in the data center is beneficial."
"There are patches that cannot be implemented without any downtime or reboot required."
"It is more expensive than the competitors."
"The cost is expensive and has room for improvement."
"There are patches that cannot be implemented without any downtime or reboot required."
"The NonStop system is well priced, but the software that runs on it is quite pricey."
"NonStop (formerly known as Tandem) in the Guardian OS could use another, friendlier macro language."
"HPE NonStop could improve by having infrastructure management."
"There were some scalability issues. When we decided to migrate an application or port application, the limitations of these servers did not help us."
"It is a nearly perfect product, although it also has some restrictions and short comings."
"Currently the NonStop platform doesn’t support virtualization of servers or CPU’s. Only storage."
"I would never advise someone to buy or to implement the new NonStop because it's hard to find skilled people."
"The NonStop Support Center is very good, with an occasional bump in the road."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It makes much more sense for individual licenses for distributed environments"
"The pricing for Cisco is less than for the HP Proliant series."
"It is highly-priced."
"The price of this solution compared to others is fair."
"There is a need to pay towards the licensing costs of the solution on a yearly basis. Price-wise, it is an expensive product"
"From a business point of view, the price is on the higher end."
"The licensing cost is a little bit expensive because by default, it depends on your fabric interconnect model. Most of the time, however, Cisco provides a lot of promotions to the customers, so the cost can be waived for many projects. The price of the chassis itself is fair."
"Considering our market, I rate the pricing of Cisco UCS B-Series as a six."
"HPE NonStop is definitely on the higher end."
"The price of the solution is too high. If they lowered the price substantially it would open up more opportunities. It's considered a replacement for the old 9000 boxes of HP. If it had a lower price, we would be able to compete in the financial, and other sectors and other solutions such as Terraform. Having a high price makes other solutions more attractive."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Marketing Services Firm
11%
Construction Company
9%
Performing Arts
8%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
7%
University
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business21
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise41
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS B-Series?
Comparing Cisco UCS B-Series with traditional servers, while its initial cost may be slightly higher, it is not as expensive as Oracle Exadata, making it a worthwhile investment. It pays off in the...
What needs improvement with Cisco UCS B-Series?
There is a need for Cisco UCS B-Series to evolve and scale vertically, particularly with the increasing data demands and the integration of AI, ensuring the solution remains certified and capable u...
What is your primary use case for Cisco UCS B-Series?
The Cisco UCS B-Series servers are used to run backend databases ranging from small, medium, to large, running different versions of RDBMS such as Oracle, SQL, MySQL. It also includes cloud databas...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-Series
HP NonStop, HPE Integrity NonStop
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, Talbots
Bankart, Capital Securities Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE NonStop and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.