Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE NonStop compete in the enterprise server market. Cisco UCS B-Series appears to have the upper hand in scalability and integration, while HPE NonStop leads in reliability needed for mission-critical environments.
Features: Cisco UCS B-Series provides high-density blade architecture, unified infrastructure and advanced management options, such as centralized management using UCS Manager. It also facilitates seamless virtualization integration and service profile management. HPE NonStop offers unparalleled fault tolerance, continuous availability, and exceptional reliability vital for industries like banking and telecommunications. Its linear expandability allows for increased processing capacity by linking additional systems.
Room for Improvement: Cisco UCS B-Series could benefit from simplifying its complex UCS Manager and enhancing the user experience. It also needs to optimize its setup configuration process. HPE NonStop could improve by lowering its high upfront costs and minimizing complexities in deployment architecture. Additionally, enhancements in usability and user interface will aid in better client experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS B-Series offers a streamlined setup with strong vendor support, making it easy to deploy and integrate. HPE NonStop is more complex to deploy due to its specialized architecture but is backed by in-depth customer service, providing excellent support for managing critical applications.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS B-Series provides competitive pricing, focusing on cost reduction through automation and achieving a strong ROI. HPE NonStop, while more costly upfront, delivers long-term value through its substantial reliability, justifying its expense in mission-critical sectors with its 99.9% uptime and fault tolerance.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco UCS B-Series | 7.1% |
| HPE NonStop | 4.8% |
| Other | 88.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 41 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
