Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE Synergy comparison

Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE Synergy compete in the enterprise server market. Cisco holds an advantage in support and ROI, while HPE leads in flexibility and composability.

Features: Cisco UCS B-Series is praised for its scalability, efficient firmware updates using service profiles, and centralized management, making it ideal for rapidly growing IT environments. It offers seamless server provisioning and tightly integrates with virtualization technologies. HPE Synergy stands out with its composability, allowing easy hardware repurposing for various workloads, thus improving resource utilization and supporting diverse IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Cisco UCS B-Series demands significant technical expertise for optimal deployment and can improve in interface management and storage integration. Users point out its power requirements as a challenge. HPE Synergy could enhance integration with third-party products and improve automation for handling complex deployments, with some users calling for better technical support and less downtime during updates.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS B-Series users frequently commend the efficient and responsive support from Cisco TAC, highlighting their expertise and availability, which is unmatched by HPE Synergy, where users suggest improvements in response times and comprehension levels despite acknowledging the support team.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS B-Series, though having higher initial costs, is regarded for delivering substantial long-term ROI due to its consistent performance, appealing to enterprises that value stability. HPE Synergy, also considered expensive, provides a compelling ROI by reducing IT infrastructure costs through its composable infrastructure. Both systems are acknowledged for robust ROI, but Cisco often involves more negotiation in its pricing strategy.