Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco UCS B-Series based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include HPE Synergy, Dell PowerEdge MX- Series, and HPE BladeSystem.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Cisco Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Cisco UCS B-Series excels in scalability and virtualization capabilities, offering efficient system management and reduced cabling. In comparison, HPE Synergy provides composability for flexible resource allocation and modular design. Cisco offers strong networking performance; however, HPE emphasizes simplified infrastructure management.
The setup cost for Cisco UCS B-Series is often noted as high due to its comprehensive infrastructure, while HPE Synergy is praised for a more flexible pricing model, allowing for gradual investment in modular components.
The setup cost for Cisco UCS B-Series is often noted as high due to its comprehensive infrastructure, while HPE Synergy is praised for a more flexible pricing model, allowing for gradual investment in modular components.
Cisco UCS B-Series excels in integration and centralized management, appealing to those seeking robust performance. In comparison, Dell PowerEdge MX-Series emphasizes high availability and a price-performance balance, ideal for budget-conscious buyers focused on flexible network configurations.
Cisco UCS B-Series setup costs are often noted for being higher due to its sophisticated infrastructure, while Dell PowerEdge MX-Series generally features lower setup costs, offering a more budget-friendly alternative.
Cisco UCS B-Series setup costs are often noted for being higher due to its sophisticated infrastructure, while Dell PowerEdge MX-Series generally features lower setup costs, offering a more budget-friendly alternative.
HPE BladeSystem provides excellent configurability and stability, making it ideal for virtual desktop and server hosting. In comparison, Cisco UCS B-Series excels in centralized management and robust virtualization integration, offering scalability for growing demands in IT environments.
Cisco UCS B-Series excels in integration and efficient virtualization. In comparison, HPE Superdome X provides superior scalability suitable for extensive enterprise setups. Cisco is ideal for easy deployments, whereas HPE offers specialized support for scaling complex workloads in large environments.
Supermicro SuperBlade excels in affordability and ease of deployment, offering high-density computing and energy efficiency. In comparison, Cisco UCS B-Series is favored for advanced networking features and integration capabilities, providing scalable, flexible enterprise solutions but requiring a higher initial investment.
Supermicro SuperBlade offers a lower setup cost compared to the Cisco UCS B-Series, which can result in significant savings for larger deployments. Cisco UCS B-Series, however, provides robust features that may justify its higher initial investment.
Supermicro SuperBlade offers a lower setup cost compared to the Cisco UCS B-Series, which can result in significant savings for larger deployments. Cisco UCS B-Series, however, provides robust features that may justify its higher initial investment.
Cisco UCS B-Series excels with scaling flexibility, automation, and hybrid cloud deployment, ideal for organizations needing powerful and centralized management. In comparison, Lenovo Flex System delivers performance and user-friendliness, appealing to those who prioritize competitive pricing and substantial in-blade resources.
