We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE Integrity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Blade Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is pretty simple and straightforward."
"The most beneficial feature is UCS Manager. It's the best way to manage hardware, creating group policies, like scrub policies and maintenance policies."
"I like that the hardware is separated from the software definition of the components."
"In terms of the flexibility of the tool to adapt to technology needs, I think it is a very good solution."
"The hardware is easily swappable and, utilizing the boot from SAN option, you can always keep your server intact due to the service profiles."
"The solution has the ability to reuse or divide the networking, making it a flexible networking environment."
"The product's tech support has good people."
"The GUI makes is simple to use and deploy."
"The benefit provided by the solution for my organization stems from the fact that it provides maximum reliability and availability to users."
"What I like about HPE Integrity servers is how stable and easy to use they are."
"It is very fast and easy to use."
"HPE Integrity is a reliable solution, but you'll need to refurbish the hardware because it's approaching the end of sale."
"We have what is called a chief data care center support. This is the highest level of support they have. We have been very happy with the support we have received."
"The tool provides good performance and productivity."
"The product's most valuable features are troubleshooting and monitoring."
"HTML5 interface is a much needed improvement over the old Java interface, but still needs a little work."
"For future improvements, it would be a benefit if the solution could integrate better with products such as Oracle."
"The UCS manager interface needs to be cleaned up a bit and can be streamlined, but no major complaints."
"The initial setup process is complex."
"Cisco could improve the user-friendliness for less experienced users."
"This model does not support virtualization of the switch."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"Its scalability could be better."
"HPE Integrity is a pain. HPE hasn't put much work into developing the solution in the past few years because it will be discontinued soon."
"The monitoring is an area that needs some improvement."
"HPE Integrity has always been one step behind in areas like virtualization technologies, cloud enablement, the speed of backups, and replication."
"The manageability must be improved."
"Unlike other platforms, it lacks easy integration with popular cloud services like Office 365."
"HPE Integrity needs improvement in terms of pricing for scalability."
"The virtualization of HPE Integrity could be simplified. We have discussed this issue with HPE and hopefully, they will have an update."
Cisco UCS B-Series is ranked 3rd in Blade Servers with 64 reviews while HPE Integrity is ranked 7th in Blade Servers with 19 reviews. Cisco UCS B-Series is rated 8.6, while HPE Integrity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS B-Series writes "Robust hardware and efficient management of hardware, creating group policies, such as scrub policies and maintenance policies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Integrity writes "Highly stable, straightforward, and easy to use". Cisco UCS B-Series is most compared with HPE Synergy, Dell PowerEdge M, HPE BladeSystem, Super Micro SuperBlade and Pure Storage FlashBlade, whereas HPE Integrity is most compared with Super Micro SuperBlade, HPE Superdome X and HPE Synergy. See our Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE Integrity report.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
