Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE Integrity are both competitive server solutions. Cisco seems to have an advantage in scalability and integration for virtualized environments, whereas HPE is favored for its unmatched reliability and stability, especially in mission-critical applications.
Features: Cisco UCS B-Series provides impressive scalability with quick server deployment and integration capabilities, particularly for virtual environments. Its centralized management through UCS Manager and the use of service profiles simplify complex server configurations. HPE Integrity, on the other hand, is known for its high reliability and redundancy, ensuring strong availability for mission-critical tasks. Additionally, its compatibility with a broad range of applications makes it versatile for various business requirements.
Room for Improvement: Cisco UCS B-Series could improve with more user-friendly management interfaces and simpler configuration processes. Additionally, the high cost of adding storage and the need for technical proficiency during setup pose challenges. HPE Integrity could enhance its cloud integration and manageability features, and users often find its pricing less competitive.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS B-Series is versatile, supporting both on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, complemented by highly rated customer service and support. HPE Integrity is primarily deployed on-premises, boasting stability, though its support service could improve in terms of response times and technical detail.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS B-Series is considered expensive, yet users justify the cost due to its comprehensive performance and support, ultimately providing significant operational efficiencies and ROI. HPE Integrity, while also expensive, offers reliability that users find worth the investment. Cisco offers potential discounts for existing customers, yet HPE's pricing is deemed to require more competitive strategies.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco UCS B-Series | 6.9% |
| HPE Integrity | 3.0% |
| Other | 90.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 41 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
