Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE Integrity comparison

Cisco and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Cisco is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.8. Cisco holds a 8.8% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS B-Series

Read 73 Cisco UCS B-Series reviews

1,334 Views
941 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

HPE Integrity

Read 20 HPE Integrity reviews

407 Views
249 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS B-Series

HPE Integrity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE Integrity are both competitive server solutions. Cisco seems to have an advantage in scalability and integration for virtualized environments, whereas HPE is favored for its unmatched reliability and stability, especially in mission-critical applications.

Features: Cisco UCS B-Series provides impressive scalability with quick server deployment and integration capabilities, particularly for virtual environments. Its centralized management through UCS Manager and the use of service profiles simplify complex server configurations. HPE Integrity, on the other hand, is known for its high reliability and redundancy, ensuring strong availability for mission-critical tasks. Additionally, its compatibility with a broad range of applications makes it versatile for various business requirements.

Room for Improvement: Cisco UCS B-Series could improve with more user-friendly management interfaces and simpler configuration processes. Additionally, the high cost of adding storage and the need for technical proficiency during setup pose challenges. HPE Integrity could enhance its cloud integration and manageability features, and users often find its pricing less competitive.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS B-Series is versatile, supporting both on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, complemented by highly rated customer service and support. HPE Integrity is primarily deployed on-premises, boasting stability, though its support service could improve in terms of response times and technical detail.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS B-Series is considered expensive, yet users justify the cost due to its comprehensive performance and support, ultimately providing significant operational efficiencies and ROI. HPE Integrity, while also expensive, offers reliability that users find worth the investment. Cisco offers potential discounts for existing customers, yet HPE's pricing is deemed to require more competitive strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE Integrity Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE Integrity

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS B-Series

Ranking in Blade Servers

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE Integrity

Ranking in Blade Servers

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS B-Series is 8.8%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Integrity is 2.6%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

Filip Kopecký

Chief Technology Officer at HOPI HOLDING a.s.

A highly stable and secure solution that has a straightforward setup

We are running many applications for a logistics provider. We do the storing of goods for our partners and transport and so on The most valuable features of the solution are stability and security. The solution’s pricing could be improved and made cheaper. I have been using Cisco UCS B-Series…

Read full review

Linda Belebesi

Unix System Engineer at Road Accident Fund

Highly stable, straightforward, and easy to use

In terms of improvement, the operating system development is slow, making it hard to keep up with modern tech and integrate with third-party products. Unlike other platforms, it lacks easy integration with popular cloud services like Office 365. This means if you are using HPE, you might face challenges connecting to the cloud and need to rely more on on-premises servers. Also, the support is lacking in some third-party products, limiting your options.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Stateless Blade is the best feature."

"It is a very robust and reliable solution."

"The most valuable feature is the service profile."

"The most valuable features are monitoring and processing, which can handle a lot of throughput and are more powerful than the HPE series."

"The product is easy to use."

"I like that the hardware is separated from the software definition of the components."

"The Dashboard is quite impressive and is, so far, the best based on my experience."

"The most beneficial feature is UCS Manager. It's the best way to manage hardware, creating group policies, like scrub policies and maintenance policies."

More Cisco UCS B-Series pros

"It is very fast and easy to use."

"What I like about HPE Integrity servers is how stable and easy to use they are."

"This is a reliable server, and many applications are integrated there."

"HPE Integrity is a reliable solution, but you'll need to refurbish the hardware because it's approaching the end of sale."

"The benefit provided by the solution for my organization stems from the fact that it provides maximum reliability and availability to users."

"We have what is called a chief data care center support. This is the highest level of support they have. We have been very happy with the support we have received."

"The product's most valuable features are troubleshooting and monitoring."

"The tool provides good performance and productivity."

Cons

"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The solution is difficult to set up."

"The GUI is not the greatest."

"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."

"The configuration is a bit complex, as it requires very high technical expertise to apply it."

"The solution’s technical support could be better."

"It is more expensive than the competitors."

"The cost is expensive and has room for improvement."

More Cisco UCS B-Series cons

"HPE Integrity has always been one step behind in areas like virtualization technologies, cloud enablement, the speed of backups, and replication."

"HPE Integrity needs improvement in terms of pricing for scalability."

"The manageability must be improved."

"The virtualization of HPE Integrity could be simplified. We have discussed this issue with HPE and hopefully, they will have an update."

"Unlike other platforms, it lacks easy integration with popular cloud services like Office 365."

"HPE Integrity is a pain. HPE hasn't put much work into developing the solution in the past few years because it will be discontinued soon."

"Pricing is very high."

"The monitoring is an area that needs some improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is highly-priced."

"The pricing for Cisco is less than for the HP Proliant series."

"Cisco UCS B-Series is an expensive solution."

"From a business point of view, the price is on the higher end."

"The licensing cost is a little bit expensive because by default, it depends on your fabric interconnect model. Most of the time, however, Cisco provides a lot of promotions to the customers, so the cost can be waived for many projects. The price of the chassis itself is fair."

"The type of service level purchase will determine the level of support response that you receive from Cisco."

"The cost of the blade servers is okay, but the cost of Fabric Interconnects ends up increasing the overall costs. For example, suppose it costs 3,500 USD per blade server. When you include the Fabric Interconnects, you could pay up to 30,000 USD. Therefore, compared to the cost of servers from Lenovo, Huawei, Dell, or HP, the cost of Cisco servers can be high. However, Cisco gives good discounts (about 90% to 94%) to partners and to customers who are already using Cisco servers. New Cisco customers do not get the level of discount that an existing customer does. Because you can get discounts with Cisco, I would give pricing a rating of four out of five."

"The product cost is high."

More Cisco UCS B-Series pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is the best."

"The price is not very expensive."

"Price-wise, the solution is very expensive."

"There is no license required to use HPE Integrity."

"HPE Integrity's pricing could be better."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS B-Series?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easily scalable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS B-Series?

The licensing cost for three years, followed by an AMC for two years, is reasonable. However, the management software, Cisco One, is priced a bit high but still considered reasonable. No additional...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS B-Series?

Last year, we faced challenges with firmware upgrades, but they were quickly resolved with assistance from Cisco TAC.

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE Integrity?

The tool provides good performance and productivity.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Integrity?

The pricing is the best. It is suitable for us. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Integrity?

Pricing is very high. It should be less. In comparison to other brands like Dell or Cisco, I think HPE is not CTS. HPE should not be CTS. It should be less than Cisco and IBM. IBM has higher costs....

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 31% of the time

Dell PowerEdge M vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 21% of the time

HPE BladeSystem vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 20% of the time

Supermicro SuperBlade vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 12% of the time

More Cisco UCS B-Series Competitors

HPE Superdome X vs HPE Integrity

Compared 58% of the time

Supermicro SuperBlade vs HPE Integrity

Compared 42% of the time

More HPE Integrity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series

April 2025

Download Cisco UCS B-Series product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Integrity

April 2025

Download HPE Integrity product report

Also Known As

UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-Series

HP Integrity Superdome , HP Integrity, SGI Altix

Overview

Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity.

Cisco

HP Integrity solutions provide an unparalleled portfolio of resilient systems for mission-critical environments. When availability matters, the new HP Integrity NonStop X enables you to stay ahead of your competition by mitigating the risk of downtime and effortlessly meeting your business processing, OLTP, and database requirements all with an industry-standard x86 architecture.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, Talbots

Home Credit Bank

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE Integrity

April 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE Integrity

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE Integrity and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE Integrity report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.