Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE Integrity comparison

Cisco and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Cisco is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Cisco holds a 7.6% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS B-Series

Read 74 Cisco UCS B-Series reviews

1,130 Views
1,107 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

HPE Integrity

Read 20 HPE Integrity reviews

443 Views
443 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS B-Series

HPE Integrity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE Integrity are both competitive server solutions. Cisco seems to have an advantage in scalability and integration for virtualized environments, whereas HPE is favored for its unmatched reliability and stability, especially in mission-critical applications.

Features: Cisco UCS B-Series provides impressive scalability with quick server deployment and integration capabilities, particularly for virtual environments. Its centralized management through UCS Manager and the use of service profiles simplify complex server configurations. HPE Integrity, on the other hand, is known for its high reliability and redundancy, ensuring strong availability for mission-critical tasks. Additionally, its compatibility with a broad range of applications makes it versatile for various business requirements.

Room for Improvement: Cisco UCS B-Series could improve with more user-friendly management interfaces and simpler configuration processes. Additionally, the high cost of adding storage and the need for technical proficiency during setup pose challenges. HPE Integrity could enhance its cloud integration and manageability features, and users often find its pricing less competitive.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS B-Series is versatile, supporting both on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, complemented by highly rated customer service and support. HPE Integrity is primarily deployed on-premises, boasting stability, though its support service could improve in terms of response times and technical detail.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS B-Series is considered expensive, yet users justify the cost due to its comprehensive performance and support, ultimately providing significant operational efficiencies and ROI. HPE Integrity, while also expensive, offers reliability that users find worth the investment. Cisco offers potential discounts for existing customers, yet HPE's pricing is deemed to require more competitive strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE Integrity Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE Integrity

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS B-Series

Ranking in Blade Servers

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE Integrity

Ranking in Blade Servers

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS B-Series is 7.6%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Integrity is 2.6%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco UCS B-Series	7.6%
HPE Integrity	2.6%
Other	89.8%

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

DavidMbugua

Group General Manager-ICT at SkyLink

Reliable product with efficient automation capabilities

Cisco UCS B-Series manages various processes, including handling payments for over 650,000 growers, running group financials, managing human resources, and operating our main ERP system, SAP. The servers' resilience was particularly impactful. Even during power outages, the servers resumed operations from the last saved point without human intervention. The enhanced processing speed also allowed us to complete tasks that took two days in just one hour. The automation capabilities enhanced efficiency and facilitated integration with our networking components, particularly since we also used Cisco switches. The servers' security was reliable, and formal training on Cisco products made management easier. I rate the product an eight.

Read full review

Linda Belebesi

Unix System Engineer at Road Accident Fund

Highly stable, straightforward, and easy to use

In terms of improvement, the operating system development is slow, making it hard to keep up with modern tech and integrate with third-party products. Unlike other platforms, it lacks easy integration with popular cloud services like Office 365. This means if you are using HPE, you might face challenges connecting to the cloud and need to rely more on on-premises servers. Also, the support is lacking in some third-party products, limiting your options.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to replace a server with another one, simply by applying the profile"

"The most valuable features are monitoring and processing, which can handle a lot of throughput and are more powerful than the HPE series."

"It's modular."

"From a return on investment perspective, Cisco UCS B-Series is worth the money."

"The scalability is good because it comes with Fabric Interconnects, and you can directly add more blades as you go. Therefore, scalability is not a problem."

"If we could get more reference architecture available on the portal, it would be helpful in making decisions"

"The solution is stable."

"The Dual Fabric design allows for online/in-service upgrades during production with no impact."

More Cisco UCS B-Series pros

"It is very fast and easy to use."

"The tool provides good performance and productivity."

"The product's most valuable features are troubleshooting and monitoring."

"This is a reliable server, and many applications are integrated there."

"What I like about HPE Integrity servers is how stable and easy to use they are."

"The benefit provided by the solution for my organization stems from the fact that it provides maximum reliability and availability to users."

"HPE Integrity is a reliable solution, but you'll need to refurbish the hardware because it's approaching the end of sale."

"We have what is called a chief data care center support. This is the highest level of support they have. We have been very happy with the support we have received."

Cons

"The solution’s technical support could be better."

"Cisco is expensive and difficult to manage. The product is not intuitive. It also needs to improve storage management and upgrades."

"There are patches that cannot be implemented without any downtime or reboot required."

"It is more expensive than the competitors."

"The cost is expensive and has room for improvement."

"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."

"There is a delay in the product's reporting and the rebooting system compared to servers from other vendors."

"This product uses a converged network adapter because it is the only way to provide flexibility with both fiber and ethernet connections."

More Cisco UCS B-Series cons

"HPE Integrity is a pain. HPE hasn't put much work into developing the solution in the past few years because it will be discontinued soon."

"The virtualization of HPE Integrity could be simplified. We have discussed this issue with HPE and hopefully, they will have an update."

"HPE Integrity has always been one step behind in areas like virtualization technologies, cloud enablement, the speed of backups, and replication."

"Pricing is very high."

"HPE Integrity needs improvement in terms of pricing for scalability."

"The monitoring is an area that needs some improvement."

"The manageability must be improved."

"Unlike other platforms, it lacks easy integration with popular cloud services like Office 365."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco UCS B-Series is an expensive solution."

"The price of this solution compared to others is fair."

"This is a premium device and our clients are not as concerned about the reasonableness of the price compared to satisfaction with their productivity."

"The licensing cost is a little bit expensive because by default, it depends on your fabric interconnect model. Most of the time, however, Cisco provides a lot of promotions to the customers, so the cost can be waived for many projects. The price of the chassis itself is fair."

"Cisco UCS B-Series is not a cheap solution."

"A physical licensing fees needs to be paid."

"The pricing for Cisco is less than for the HP Proliant series."

"There is a need to pay towards the licensing costs of the solution on a yearly basis. Price-wise, it is an expensive product"

More Cisco UCS B-Series pricing and cost advice

"Price-wise, the solution is very expensive."

"There is no license required to use HPE Integrity."

"The price is not very expensive."

"HPE Integrity's pricing could be better."

"The pricing is the best."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	41

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS B-Series?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easily scalable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS B-Series?

Comparing Cisco UCS B-Series with traditional servers, while its initial cost may be slightly higher, it is not as expensive as Oracle Exadata, making it a worthwhile investment. It pays off in the...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS B-Series?

There is a need for Cisco UCS B-Series to evolve and scale vertically, particularly with the increasing data demands and the integration of AI, ensuring the solution remains certified and capable u...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE Integrity?

The tool provides good performance and productivity.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Integrity?

The pricing is the best. It is suitable for us. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Integrity?

Pricing is very high. It should be less. In comparison to other brands like Dell or Cisco, I think HPE is not CTS. HPE should not be CTS. It should be less than Cisco and IBM. IBM has higher costs....

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 34% of the time

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 19% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 19% of the time

HPE BladeSystem vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 14% of the time

Supermicro SuperBlade vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 13% of the time

More Cisco UCS B-Series Competitors

HPE Superdome X vs HPE Integrity

Compared 49% of the time

Supermicro SuperBlade vs HPE Integrity

Compared 35% of the time

HPE Synergy vs HPE Integrity

Compared 16% of the time

More HPE Integrity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series

September 2025

Download Cisco UCS B-Series product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Integrity

September 2025

Download HPE Integrity product report

Also Known As

UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-Series

HP Integrity Superdome , HP Integrity, SGI Altix

Overview

Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity.

Cisco

HP Integrity solutions provide an unparalleled portfolio of resilient systems for mission-critical environments. When availability matters, the new HP Integrity NonStop X enables you to stay ahead of your competition by mitigating the risk of downtime and effortlessly meeting your business processing, OLTP, and database requirements all with an industry-standard x86 architecture.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, Talbots

Home Credit Bank

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE Integrity

September 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE Integrity

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE Integrity and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE Integrity report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.