Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs Lumen MPLS IP VPN comparison

Cisco and Lumen Technologies are both solutions in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category. Cisco is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0, while Lumen Technologies is ranked #36. Cisco holds a 6.1% mindshare in EIV, compared to Lumen Technologies’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lumen Technologies users who would recommend it.

Cisco Secure Client (includ...

Read 78 Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) reviews

5,970 Views
3,940 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Lumen MPLS IP VPN

Read 1 Lumen MPLS IP VPN review

350 Views
340 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Secure Client (includ...

Lumen MPLS IP VPN

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) and Lumen MPLS IP VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN.

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,667 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure Client (includ...

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SSL VPN (1st), ZTNA as a Service (9th), Cisco Security Portfolio (5th)

Lumen MPLS IP VPN

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

36th

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) is 6.1%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lumen MPLS IP VPN is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)	6.1%
Lumen MPLS IP VPN	0.4%
Other	93.5%

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

Featured Reviews

AJAY SARPAL

Manager - Projects at airtel

Offers work-from-anywhere flexibility but navigates occasional proxy confusion

The analytics I downloaded from your site as a free download did not carry the information that was actually required. I was looking at the market segmentation and market share, along with some USPs which differentiated them from each other. The free download had two issues: many things were repetitive, and it was designed to not release any relevant information. Only headers were present, so I was not able to determine whether the final report would be worthwhile. I have not worked with enterprise tools that I could share feedback on for website publication. I see benefits from using Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect). However, I would not recommend it because future adoptions will be towards Zscaler, as SSC is a better model than VPN. On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution a 7.

Read full review

reviewer1474251

Vice President at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

A robust, scalable, stable, and evolved product

It depends on multiple factors. If your building is already connected, then it is very easy to install. When the building is connected, we can set it up within three to four days. When the order gets triggered, we can do the implementation. We don't have to do much, but if the building is not connected, then there is a challenge. We need to pull out fiber or connect to RF, and we have to try some devices to provide internet. Depending on the distance out and the length of the fiber that needs to be deployed, it could take weeks and months because there are multiple factors. We also have to take permission from the local authorities, dig the roads, and do all that stuff. After we have the approvals in place, we can start the deployment. It can take a week or three months.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is the consistency, I have not had any issues with the performance."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"On Cisco's side, the Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) story is quite valuable."

"It utilizes certificates, which allows for automatic setup."

"This is absolutely a product that I can recommend."

"Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client's most valuable feature is the ability to connect to our enterprise applications, on-premise applications, and cloud any place in the world"

"AnyConnect is more stable than any other VPN connection, in my experience."

"Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) is very stable."

More Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) pros

"It is a robust solution. You can scale it up as per your requirement."

"We offer the best of times, so we commit 99.8% of the time on fiber and 98.5% on RF."

Cons

"In terms of areas for improvement in Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, from my point of view, the solution works well and right now I don't see the need to improve it. Probably a better user interface could be created for Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, but its core is VPN creation, and that works well, though I'm not a VPN specialist, and I'm not an expert on how to create a VPN, how the VPN gateway works, how it's implemented, and what's the architecture behind it. A two-factor authentication feature was recently added to the Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client. In the past, you only needed to log in with your username and password, but now, there's a token, and the user interface for that token isn't that good. That's another area for improvement. Cisco should also make the two-factor authentication better in the solution. What I'd like added to the Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client in its next release is a better two-factor authentication, in particular, the validity of the code being shorter because sometimes when I get the code and I add it to the client, it's invalid, though I'm unsure if it's centrally set up that way or if its a characteristic of the product. Making the interface of the Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client more user-friendly is also what I'd like to see in the next release of the solution."

"All I care about is being connected and I know that we've run into versioning issues in the past."

"The setup could be simplified for solutions engineers with a wizard."

"If you're just turning on your laptop, it should connect automatically without keying in the credentials."

"Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client can be improved by having better speed and reliability."

"Cisco Secure Client is quite solid, but the license terms are complex and could be improved."

"I would like a faster connection from the solution."

"Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client would be perfect if it weren't for the fingerprint feature."

More Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) cons

"It should have better integration with other platforms. With the internet, very few innovations can be there, but there are some solutions that can be integrated into the solutions that we provide"

"It should have better integration with other platforms."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing costs are reasonable."

"It costs around 80,000 Indian rupees for a hundred licenses, so approximately $1,020 USD."

"Sometimes there is a problem with the number of licenses for the end-user. The number of concurrent users is limited due to a valid license."

"One thing I've noticed is the price in comparison to other VPNs."

"I am using a paid version of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client."

"We pay for an annual subscription. Additionally to the subscription, we thought in order to connect this solution to the Active Directory we had to purchase a Cisco ACS, Access Control System. It turns out we did not actually need it."

"I would rate the pricing for the license of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client around four to five out of ten. It's not the cheapest option, but it's also not overly expensive."

"My company has a three-year or a four-year license. In scenarios attached to a solution where the product may be reaching an end-of-support or end-of-life phase, Cisco provides OS support in such environments."

More Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) pricing and cost advice

"As a provider, we need to have licenses from the regulatory authorities. Once we have those licenses in place, we can provide connections to our customers. So, getting licenses is a challenge. It is a time-consuming process. Other than that, there is no massive challenge."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client?

The tool is user-friendly, robust and easy to use in any environment.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client?

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) is somewhat expensive compared to others such as Fortinet or Palo Alto, which provide free VPN when the firewall is purchased. Palo Alto and Fortinet prov...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client?

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) can be made better, as the product for me has not changed in the last year. The only problem is that if you want to download it somewhere else, you cannot...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenVPN Access Server vs Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway vs Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)

Compared 5% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)

Compared 5% of the time

Ivanti Connect Secure vs Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)

Compared 4% of the time

Check Point Remote Access VPN vs Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) Competitors

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Lumen MPLS IP VPN

Compared 40% of the time

AWS Direct Connect vs Lumen MPLS IP VPN

Compared 36% of the time

AWS PrivateLink vs Lumen MPLS IP VPN

Compared 24% of the time

More Lumen MPLS IP VPN Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)

March 2026

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) report

Download Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

February 2026

Download Lumen MPLS IP VPN product report

Also Known As

Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client

CenturyLink MPLS/IP VPN, CenturyLink MPLS IP VPN

Overview

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) delivers reliable, stable connectivity and seamless integration with Active Directory, ensuring secure remote access through a one-click VPN capability. It's lightweight, user-friendly, and supports major operating systems, enhancing remote work flexibility.

Cisco Secure Client, including AnyConnect, is designed for secure remote connectivity, offering multi-factor authentication, advanced malware protection, and automatic error diagnostics. Compatible with Windows, Mac, and Linux, it provides an intuitive setup and a clean interface. While it excels in ease of use, issues such as the outdated Linux build and the need for modern UI enhancements persist. Users also face connectivity challenges with frequent updates and high prices, alongside the need for better endpoint security and system integration. Popular for remote work, it facilitates secure access to corporate networks, allowing seamless interactions with resources like emails, documents, and applications.

What key features does Cisco Secure Client offer?

Reliable Connectivity: Provides stable, dependable VPN access with a one-click connection.
Multi-Factor Authentication: Enhances security through additional user verification steps.
Advanced Malware Protection: Safeguards against threats with proactive protection measures.
Automatic Error Diagnostics: Identifies and fixes errors promptly.
Cross-Platform Support: Compatible with Windows, Mac, and Linux for broad accessibility.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Increased Remote Work Efficiency: Facilitates secure, fast access to necessary resources.
Improved Network Security: Provides robust protection against external threats.
Ease of Use: Features simple setup and user-friendly interface for quick deployment.
Enhanced Data Protection: Keeps sensitive information secure through encryption and authentication.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers a good balance of features against pricing, though further improvements could enhance value.

Cisco Secure Client is widely implemented across industries for secure remote connectivity, especially in sectors requiring constant access to servers, data centers, and research labs. It supports remote work by enabling employees in diverse fields to access internal resources efficiently, maintaining productivity and security.

Cisco

CenturyLink® MPLS/IP VPN provides traffic prioritization and routing, allowing you to efficiently deliver applications across multiple locations.

Lumen Technologies

Sample Customers

MST, Molina Healthcare, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers, Arup, New South Wales Rural FireService

Mammoet, En Masse

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.