Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 5, 2022
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco ISE (Identity Service...
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
139
Ranking in other categories
Network Access Control (NAC) (1st), Cisco Security Portfolio (1st)
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (5th), Authentication Systems (3rd), Identity Management (IM) (7th), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is 25.7%, down from 32.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is 4.0%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Access Control (NAC)
Unique Categories:
Cisco Security Portfolio
22.4%
Single Sign-On (SSO)
8.8%
Authentication Systems
9.6%
 

Featured Reviews

TO
May 3, 2024
Helped improve our security and is reliable
The solution is being used for authentication purposes and for sharing assessments.  Cisco ISE has helped improve our security.  It helps ensure that you are working in accordance with the organizational policy before you join the network. Also, the solution is very reliable.  I would like to…
it_user589359 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 18, 2017
It has its own hardware and software token for two-factor authentication. Some of the settings are difficult to access.
One of the most valuable features is the simple FSSO (Fortinet Single Sign-On) configuration that helps to manage user-based security rules. It is a cool security product. It's easy to use, implement and maintain, but there is room for improvement When we came across access management, we…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For guests we give them limited access to the internet when they come in so that access has been useful. Previously, we just used to give them the APN key which they would leave with. Now, we give them credentials to use that are for a limited period of time."
"There is good integration with third-party systems like antivirus patch management, MDM."
"It provides client provisions and profiling as well as guest access."
"The user experience of the solution is great. It's a very transparent system."
"It's scalable."
"The initial setup was easy. It took around one month. We did the installation part within half an hour to two hours but we found a couple of issues so we raised a case and once everything was resolved it was a month in total."
"The return on investment we have seen is related to time in terms of troubleshooting. The logs, such as the security logs, inform us of the issues that people have had. ISE has been very instrumental in helping isolate those issues. We've seen a lot of cost savings because we don't have to pay an IT person to waste time doing something that should be instantaneous."
"The first benefit is that we can implement zero trust architecture because of Cisco ISE. I can assure my CISO in my company that my network is such that nobody can just bring in their laptop, desktop, or any sort of mobile device and can directly get connected to my network. That is a benefit that I can only allow people who I trust on the network."
"It is very stable. We have never had any issues with this solution."
"We have not had issues with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator. It is stable."
"The most valuable feature is the OTP on the mobile phone."
"We have a perpetual license for 2FA."
"The most valuable features are the performance and ease of use."
"The initial setup of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is easy."
"The product is stable and reliable."
"Simple to deploy, simple to use, and user-friendly."
 

Cons

"Difficult to figure out the protocols and nodes in order to implement correctly."
"ISE is a little clunky. The front-end feels like it is from the 1980s."
"Cisco ISE has numerous features that are impractical, and I won't utilize them since they require payment."
"The initial setup process is complex since there are so many big components."
"There should be an easier way to do the upgrades. There are a lot of steps to get to the next version from the previous version which ends up being a bit of the headache with the upgrade."
"I would like to see them simplify the dashboard. It's very configurable, but, at the same time, it's not easy to maneuver through it. They should "Merakify" it."
"The web UI should be made similar to the one in DNAC."
"The tracking mechanism in Cisco ISE is relatively costly, especially its vendor-specific protocol."
"We've had some issues with integration."
"For improvement, Fortinet needs to ensure that they provide quick support to users...Fortinet sometimes needs to respond to users facing issues within an hour."
"It can not use SQL to query FortiAnalyzer directly."
"The speed of deployment on the cloud could be improved. It took a few days when it should have been just two days"
"A better integration with other vendors."
"The technical support team is bad."
"I don't have any issues with this solution, but it may need a better, more user-friendly interface or better design of the platform."
"There is room for improvement in stability and support."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is difficult to measure security breaches, but since we have not been attacked so far, it has paid for itself over the years."
"The recent changes in the licensing model have caused some issues with the team."
"Cybersecurity resilience has been very important to our organization and has been a big factor. We've had issues in the past, but one of the things I like about ISE is its logging features. Security wise or information wise, it really has been a powerful tool."
"There are three levels of pricing: basic, plus, and apex. Basic satisfied our needs."
"It costs around 50,000 baht in the first year, but I'm unsure about the second year."
"Cisco has actually transitioned to a lot of subscription models, fees, and licenses."
"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."
"The price is okay."
"Between paying them to help with the configuration, the box itself, and the support, it came to like $12,500, including a three-year service agreement."
"I would start off with a VM including the base license and scale according to the number of users you need to authenticate."
"I price of the solution is expensive."
"It is usually cheap. Without a license, you can use some basic features. You can buy a 20-year license and implement the solution once."
"I would rate the pricing a four out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is not that costly. It is cheap, easy to manage, easy to install, and easy to configure."
"FAC is an affordable solution for Middle Range (200E/400E) and also needs a package of mobility agents (2,000) perpetual."
"I rate the price of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator a three out of five."
"It's not expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
24%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
21%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Aruba Clearpass or Cisco ISE?
Aruba ClearPass is a Network Access Control tool that gives secure network access to multiple device types. You can adapt the policies to VPN access, wired, or wireless access. You can securely ...
What are the main differences between Cisco ISE and Forescout Platform?
OK, so Cisco ISE uses 802.1X to secure switchports against unauthorized access. The drawback of this is that ISE cannot secure the port if a device does not support 802.1x. Cameras, badge readers, ...
How does Cisco ISE compare with Fortinet FortiNAC?
Cisco ISE uses AI endpoint analytics to identify new devices based on their behavior. It will also notify you if someone plugs in with a device that is not allowed and will block it. The user exper...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?
The price seems okay. It's not that expensive compared to other authenticators. Especially the clients, like Fortinet VPN clients, it is free. Unless you take the full feature of the FortiClient, t...
What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?
One thing I dislike is that if you have the software authenticator on a mobile device and that device is lost, it's difficult to remove. If you have the FortiAuthenticator client installed on your ...
 

Also Known As

Cisco ISE
FortiAuthenticator
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, BC Hydro, Beachbody, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Cisco IT, Derby City Council, Global Banking Customer, Gobierno de Castilla-La Mancha, Houston Methodist, Linz AG, London Hydro, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Molina Healthcare, MST Systems, New South Wales Rural Fire Service, Reykjavik University, Wildau University
Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.