

Apptio Cloudability and CloudCheckr CMx High Security compete in the cloud management category. Cloudability has the upper hand in cost management features, while CloudCheckr excels in security and ease of use.
Features: Apptio Cloudability offers detailed reporting, customizable dashboards, and integration features focusing on AWS compatibility. Its forecasting and budgeting capabilities add value. CloudCheckr CMx High Security stands out with multi-cloud visibility, effective security checks, and actionable cost-saving recommendations for AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud.
Room for Improvement: Cloudability could improve its ease of use, automation capabilities, and cloud support, with API functionality and dashboard customization also needing enhancement. CloudCheckr faces challenges with integration speed for Azure and Google Cloud, user interface customization, and performance with larger data sets, along with occasional reporting issues.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both platforms deploy across public clouds; CloudCheckr also supports private clouds. Cloudability is praised for support, though some users see variability in technical assistance. CloudCheckr users have mixed support experiences, particularly when integrating with Azure and Google Cloud.
Pricing and ROI: Cloudability's pricing is perceived as expensive but provides significant ROI with its features, though high costs may deter smaller users. CloudCheckr offers competitive pricing with custom arrangements based on cloud spend, delivering notable ROI with effective cost-saving strategies.
It'd be very easy to save at least 10 to 20% costs from cloud spend just by utilizing the features of right-sizing or commitments management that Cloudability offers.
We save time by making the reporting easier.
I have seen a return on investment of 100%, with significant cost avoidance and measurable savings within the first few months of deployment.
This part has been eliminated and has saved significant effort while ensuring all teams remain aligned at all times.
I've seen a return on investment, as the savings are concrete, measurable, and they show up directly in the AWS bill.
The customer support from Cloudability is great.
Cloudability's customer support is adequate, and I would rate it an 8 on a scale of 1 to 10.
The additional support ended up taking longer than expected, with responses that did not meet our need for detailed and technical assistance.
Sometimes support needs to be reached, but they are very responsive and supportive.
The customer support for CloudCheckr is fantastic.
Cloudability's scalability is excellent because it can link with as few as one cloud account to thousands of cloud accounts, so there are no issues there.
It scales well for MSPs and large enterprises, allowing for management of hundreds of accounts and tens of thousands of resources while retaining performance and visibility.
CloudCheckr is stable and rock solid.
I've found that Groups is basically unusable because if it can't be used everywhere, you would have to run both group-based access control and direct user-based access control at the same time, which doesn't make any sense.
It would be beneficial if we could use resource tags to provide more fine-grained visibility.
I believe that automating all manual processes in Cloudability would be beneficial, providing a proactive prescriptive analysis on what needs to be done to lower costs.
CloudCheckr is a powerful and feature-rich tool with abundant metrics.
Another area is drift analysis; there have been complaints about tracking optimization opportunities, such as how to track opportunities identified in January and whether they were resolved in February.
CloudCheckr could enhance its Azure support, as it honestly feels an afterthought.
You also get value for money because of the breadth and depth of the features.
Overall, the pricing was quite convenient and represented good value for money.
Pricing is feature-tiered under the MSP licensing, and I would say the pricing was quite competitive and fair.
I won't pretend it's cheap, but we've saved multiples of what we pay for it, so the conversation with finance is straightforward.
The Views feature is also beneficial because lots of teams may use Cloudability within an organization, allowing users to segregate data to particular Views so they are only looking at what's relevant to them.
The forecasting feature has helped me understand how the resources are utilized and how the cost is burned, and then I use it to make changes to keep the cost in control.
I find the reports to be extensive and elaborate, and I get whatever information I require.
The cost visibility and reporting are really valuable, and the dashboard is informative and enables good decision-making.
CloudCheckr has positively impacted our organization as we've cut AWS spend by around 25% over two years.
What makes CloudCheckr easy for me to use is its intuitive interface.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cloudability | 5.5% |
| CloudCheckr | 2.9% |
| Other | 91.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
Cloudability offers advanced management of cloud costs across platforms, providing transparency, detailed billing, and reports. It integrates with AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud to optimize financial performance and resource utilization.
Cloudability is designed for comprehensive cost management in multi-cloud landscapes. Users benefit from its robust features, including cost optimization, forecasting, and detailed reporting. With tools like Reserved Instance Planner, it simplifies management of AWS environments. Its integration capabilities extend to multiple cloud platforms, providing a unified view of financials and resource usage. Despite its advantages, users seek better API integration for a seamless experience. Enhancements in automation, data accuracy, and dashboard customization are desired to improve usability and insights. Organizations leverage its capabilities to monitor and manage spending while optimizing infrastructure utilization.
What key features does Cloudability provide?
Why consider Cloudability reviews?
Cloudability is widely implemented across industries where managing cloud costs is critical. In sectors such as technology, finance, and manufacturing, organizations rely on its capability to optimize multi-cloud environments. It allows teams to consolidate data for better financial tracking and resource efficiency, ensuring that infrastructure investment aligns with business objectives.
CloudCheckr offers a cohesive platform for managing cloud infrastructures with a focus on cost visibility, security, and compliance. Designed for multi-cloud environments, it provides insights and optimizations to enhance decision-making and resource efficiency.
CloudCheckr delivers thorough cloud management with features like cost analysis, security and compliance checks, and automated optimization suggestions. Its intuitive interface allows for easy deployment, supporting cost-saving measures. Users often find its cost visibility, multi-cloud integration capabilities, and granular reporting particularly beneficial. However, improvements can be made in areas such as Azure and Google Cloud integration, reporting capabilities, pricing model clarity, and UI complexity reduction.
What are CloudCheckr's key features?Industries using CloudCheckr benefit from enhanced cloud financial optimization and security monitoring. Managed service providers find it crucial for customer billing, while organizations leverage its multi-cloud support for maintaining compliance and governing usage. Specifically useful in sectors like finance and technology, it aids in data analysis and cost-saving strategies.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.