Checkmk vs ServiceNow Discovery comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Checkmk Logo
2,121 views|1,953 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
ServiceNow Logo
4,283 views|1,920 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Checkmk and ServiceNow Discovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. ServiceNow Discovery Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""We can monitor multiple sites using the product.""I really like the auto-discovery feature.""The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution.""It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD.""The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."

More Checkmk Pros →

"ServiceNow Discovery works better than other products I've used.""It's a single system of record and it captures the relationships.""It is a stable solution...The initial setup of the product is straightforward.""The most valuable feature is its integration with CMDB, as it collects all the data.""The solution finds public cloud infrastructures globally and updates the integration management database, service catalogs, and asset management details.""This solution provides excellent insights.""One highly valuable aspect is the use of service accounts, which automates the process of identifying underlying nodes and associated assets.""It has been stable since deployment."

More ServiceNow Discovery Pros →

Cons
"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most.""Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert.""If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved.""It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating.""The initial setup is a bit complex.""In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

More Checkmk Cons →

"ServiceNow Discovery could improve the interface. The navigation bar could improve. It would be helpful to have a landing page to go to find all the elements in one place.""The service mapping component is less developed than it is in other solutions, and is in need of improvement.""In a few instances, ServiceNow has failed to discover some basic things. Some other tools are better at network discovery than ServiceNow. I'm not talking about database servers or any other infrastructure—only networking. Cloud discovery could also be better.""It is one of the most costly applications in terms of subscription costs.""What needs improvement in ServiceNow Discovery is the reporting UI because I didn't find it as friendly compared to other tools. Other tools have better reporting UI than what's currently in ServiceNow Discovery. What I'd like to see in the next release of ServiceNow Discovery is more user-friendly out-of-the-box reporting that would be helpful for non-technical users. Some users such as managers would want to just do a few clicks to access the reports and shouldn't be required to do search queries, but right now, reporting in the tool isn't very user-friendly.""It creates quite a bit of duplication, so that needs to be fixed.""ServiceNow Discovery should be updated to provide its users with more out-of-the-box information and attributes to support the routers and switches from Cisco.""The solution is too high priced."

More ServiceNow Discovery Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."
  • "The product is affordable."
  • "Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."
  • More Checkmk Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This solution is a paid option within the ServiceNow framework."
  • "It's a bit expensive compared to other products in the market, but it's worth the money you pay because it's far advanced in terms of features, automation, and capabilities compared to other products."
  • "There is a subscription for ServiceNow Discovery. It's expensive, but I think it's one of the best solutions on the market, so it's worth it."
  • "The price could be better. It's a bit on the pricey side."
  • "It is an expensive product with a price that depends on the models that you wish to purchase."
  • "It costs a lot. It is probably close to over a hundred thousand. It's an expensive platform, but you can't compare ServiceNow's Discovery functionality to other discovery tools. It's not an apples-to-apples comparison of ServiceNow to a configuration management tool to an asset management tool because it does those things, but it's not those things."
  • "You need a subscription to ServiceNow Discovery, so you can use its features. You can also use specific plugins with the tool, and some of the plugins are free. I don't have information on how much my company pays for the subscription to ServiceNow Discovery."
  • "The solution is very expensive."
  • More ServiceNow Discovery Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
    770,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:Checkmk has been constantly improving the tool. I am quite impressed that Checkmk has been keeping up with changes. It would be appropriate to say that I am fairly impressed with Checkmk. I am pretty… more »
    Top Answer:My company uses Checkmk to monitor our core servers, and we also use it for our network devices for more of a storing thing because the DNA part keeps about a week's worth of work, and that's about… more »
    Top Answer:The product provides great scalability features.
    Top Answer:Though I am not much involved in the pricing part, I know that it is a bit costly. As per a general discussion I had with the stakeholders, I figured out that it is a costly tool. There is a need to… more »
    Top Answer:On the patent side, my company faced some issues with ServiceNow Discovery. In the subsequent releases of the product, ServiceNow promptly addressed the patent-related issues in the tool. More… more »
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 42 in Server Monitoring
    Views
    2,121
    Comparisons
    1,953
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    718
    Rating
    8.5
    3rd
    out of 42 in Server Monitoring
    Views
    4,283
    Comparisons
    1,920
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    614
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    ServiceNow
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Quickly gain a complete view of your IT infrastructure, no matter how complex. Checkmk provides powerful monitoring of networks, servers, clouds, containers and applications. Fast. Effective.

    ServiceNow Discovery finds applications and devices on your network, and then updates the CMDB with the information it finds. Discovery is available as a separate subscription from the rest of the Now Platform.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    York, National Grid, DXC Technology, experian, BEACHBODY
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government8%
    Retailer6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Retailer12%
    Educational Organization12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise54%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Checkmk vs. ServiceNow Discovery
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. ServiceNow Discovery and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Checkmk is ranked 7th in Server Monitoring with 6 reviews while ServiceNow Discovery is ranked 3rd in Server Monitoring with 37 reviews. Checkmk is rated 8.6, while ServiceNow Discovery is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Checkmk writes "A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Discovery writes "Valuable relationship building that discovers and auto-builds to make cleanup easy". Checkmk is most compared with Zabbix, Icinga, Netdata, Centreon and Observium, whereas ServiceNow Discovery is most compared with Tanium, Microsoft Configuration Manager, Lansweeper, AWS Cloud Map and ScienceLogic. See our Checkmk vs. ServiceNow Discovery report.

    See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

    We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.