Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs Contrast Security Assess comparison

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Contrast Security Assess

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.3

Check Point WAF boosts efficiency by consolidating tools, saving costs, and improving security, with organizations reporting substantial financial benefits.

Sentiment score

6.8

Contrast Security Assess improves code quality, reduces costs, and streamlines workflows by detecting vulnerabilities early, enhancing efficiency.

When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.

Thanos Constantopoulos

Manager, Managed Security Services at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

Contrast has probably saved us a couple hundred hours over the past six years.

Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The speed of fixing issues is significantly improved due to the vast amount of information provided by Contrast Security Assess, making it quite essential for finding the root cause of problems in the source code.

For more quotes and insights, download the Contrast Security Assess report

Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.7

Check Point WAF's customer service is well-regarded for responsiveness and expertise, though speed and complexity resolution need improvement.

Sentiment score

8.4

Contrast Security Assess support is responsive and knowledgeable, with efficient issue resolution and high user satisfaction despite customization challenges.

They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

They go out of their way to respond quickly and very knowledgeably.

Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Customer support is one of the strongest points of Contrast Security Assess, as they are really responsive and answer tickets in less than one hour.

For more quotes and insights, download the Contrast Security Assess report

Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.3

Check Point WAF efficiently scales for cloud environments, accommodating growth and workload changes without bottlenecks, earning high scalability ratings.

Sentiment score

8.0

Contrast Security Assess offers scalability across platforms but faces challenges with change management and limited technology support.

If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.

Mantu Shaw

Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Check Point CloudGuard WAF's scalability is very good.

Ruben Ruiz

Sr. VP of Creative & Development at a non-tech company with 51-200 employees

It is fairly simple to install the agents for Contrast Security Assess and keep them updated.

Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Contrast Security Assess's scalability is not an issue at all.

For more quotes and insights, download the Contrast Security Assess report

Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.2

Check Point WAF offers stable, reliable protection with minimal downtime, despite occasional configuration and licensing challenges that are quickly resolved.

Sentiment score

7.9

Contrast Security Assess is highly stable and reliable, with occasional environment-related issues and limited ColdFusion support.

It is very stable.

RicardoFernandes1

Team Leader, Cloudops & Cloud Architect at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees

It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.

Rui Dias

Sysadmin at a government with 501-1,000 employees

I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.

Charalampos Symeou

Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

We opened a ticket to customer support and experienced four weeks of disruption due to the extension malfunctioning in some of the .NET servers running Contrast Security Assess.

For more quotes and insights, download the Contrast Security Assess report

Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Room For Improvement

Check Point WAF users seek better pricing, simplicity, AI features, multilingual support, enhanced APIs, and improved documentation and support.

Contrast Security Assess offers effective automation but requires better documentation, integration, reporting, support, pricing flexibility, and AI enhancements.

The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

Future releases should include better bot mitigation, behavioral anomaly detection, compliance templates, advanced threat intel integration, and streamlined multi-cloud support to boost protection and usability.

Kresimir Mikolcevic

Senior Cyber Security Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

A machine learning-based adaptive mode could help the WAF learn over time and auto-tune policies.

reviewer2702679

Technical Support Executive at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Regarding Contrast Security Assess's AI capabilities, I think they are missing a huge opportunity because they could lead the way in automatic testing and AI security testing.

Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Contrast support has been great in fixing any issues or getting back to us with questions.

For more quotes and insights, download the Contrast Security Assess report

Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Contrast Security Assess can be improved as it checks the code and asks to fix the code that is vulnerable, and in that way, we can prevent potential hacking or attempts for people to inject malicious code.

reviewer2882520

Postdoctoral Research Fellow at a program development consultancy with 1-10 employees

Setup Cost

Check Point WAF pricing is high but justified by robust features, reliable security, and flexible licensing options.

Contrast Security Assess offers scalable pricing based on application size and environment, ranging from $20,000 to $100,000 annually.

It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.

Mantu Shaw

Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.

Baruch Peretz

Ciso at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Licensing costs are fairly high compared to other DAST and SAST tools, but it seems to be worth the money.

For more quotes and insights, download the Contrast Security Assess report

Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Valuable Features

Check Point WAF offers AI-driven security, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective protection with centralized management and simplified configuration.

Contrast Security Assess offers real-time vulnerability detection with minimal false positives, enhancing security through CI/CD integration and proactive measures.

Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.

Domenico Cacciari

Security Administrator at regione marche

The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.

Charalampos Symeou

Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

The ability to see what is going on and what has been going on in a given application and basically get to see what is coming across it in real time is helpful in finding vulnerabilities to remediate before production deployments.

Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Instead of fixing each vulnerability reported independently, you can group them and fix them in a single point in the source code, resolving several vulnerabilities at once.

For more quotes and insights, download the Contrast Security Assess report

Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Contrast Security Assess has positively impacted my organization by improving the security features of our application.

reviewer2882520

Postdoctoral Research Fellow at a program development consultancy with 1-10 employees

Categories and Ranking

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (6th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (5th), DevSecOps (2nd)

Contrast Security Assess

Ranking in Application Security Tools

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 1.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Contrast Security Assess is 1.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	1.1%
Contrast Security Assess	1.7%
Other	97.2%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

Real-time assessments have improved remediation speed and reduced time spent on authentication issues

Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

I do find that here and there with Contrast Security Assess there are user interface issues, particularly with how they work with libraries. The way that it works is people have access to library data for all applications, not just the applications that they should have access to. However, they are trying to fix that. The way the libraries are handled with Contrast Security Assess could use some work. I know that there is an additional service tier that allows for more in-depth library data. These are small things. Contrast support has been great in fixing any issues or getting back to us with questions. They seem to really be dedicated to the product.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	40

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Contrast Security Assess?

I was not involved in the negotiation of pricing for Contrast Security Assess, but I am somewhat familiar with setup cost and licensing. Licensing costs are fairly high compared to other DAST and S...

What needs improvement with Contrast Security Assess?

What advice do you have for others considering Contrast Security Assess?

I would give Contrast Security Assess a score of 8 out of 10. That is a small little issue, but it is a great product and I would recommend it to others. There are a couple things that could be imp...

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Comparisons

Compared 6% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

Veracode vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 6% of the time

Mend.io vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 5% of the time

Quotium Seeker vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 5% of the time

Oligo vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 5% of the time

More Contrast Security Assess Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

October 2026

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Download Contrast Security Assess product report

Contrast Security Assess

October 2026

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

Contrast Assess

Overview

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

Contrast Security Assess is an IAST platform known for accurate vulnerability detection. It integrates into development workflows, offering real-time insights into security issues with minimal false positives, supporting legacy applications and enhancing code security visibility.

Designed to integrate seamlessly into DevOps workflows, Contrast Security Assess automates real-time vulnerability detection and reduces false positives through its powerful IAST features. By continuously monitoring vulnerabilities, it provides a robust option for securing legacy applications and identifying vulnerabilities without lengthy scans. This cloud-hosted platform supports numerous programming languages, making it versatile for security testing across enterprise environments. Users benefit from detailed reports that pinpoint exact code locations requiring remediation, enhancing speed and efficiency in addressing security concerns.

What are the key features of Contrast Security Assess?

IAST Technology: Delivers accurate vulnerability detection with reduced false positives.
Seamless Integration: Integrates into development processes, supporting real-time vulnerability detection.
Open Source Security: Analyzes third-party libraries for vulnerabilities.
Continuous Monitoring: Provides valuable insights with real-time security feedback for developers.
API Interface: Enhances operational efficiency and streamlining with minimal false positives.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Security Visibility: Offers comprehensive insights across application environments.
Speed and Efficiency: Quick identification and remediation of vulnerabilities accelerate development.
Operational Streamlining: Seamless integration into DevOps workflows improves productivity.
Legacy Application Support: Effective for securing existing applications with ongoing monitoring.

Companies in industries requiring high levels of application security, such as finance and healthcare, implement Contrast Security Assess for its ability to enhance visibility and detect vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle. Its seamless integration with DevOps processes makes it ideal for environments that prioritize agility while maintaining stringent security standards.

Contrast Security

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Williams-Sonoma, Autodesk, HUAWEI, Chromeriver, RingCentral, Demandware.