We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"To maintain the authorization of the connected user, Check Point provides multi-factor authentication for an RA VPN client to make sure legitimate users have access to resources."
"It offers a simple configuration and setup."
"The solution offers great security features, including zero-day protection, malware protection, anti-phishing, et cetera."
"Setting policies allow, block, and limit users' access."
"Once we install and connect the VPN service, it keeps on running until we disconnect."
"Access is browser-based only and requires no additional client installation."
"The IPSec VPN, Mobile Access, and Identity Awareness are three of the blades with which we have been working with since the pandemic. This has given us great mobility, making our network more dynamic."
"Our number of users working remotely vastly increased during the COVID 19 pandemic. Check Point Remote Access VPN allowed us to quickly make the transition from in-office to remote work."
"It is an easy system to set up."
"I'd rate Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client at nine out of ten for scalability."
"The solution is a super product that works as designed."
"Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client's most valuable feature is the ability to connect to our enterprise applications, on-premise applications, and cloud any place in the world"
"The security AnyConnect offers is excellent. It disconnects automatically if someone isn't using it on a private network and doesn't allow you to work, ensuring the data within the system is secure."
"We have plans to increase the usage of this solution, it can scale well."
"It does not slow down anything, unlike other solutions."
"What I like most about Cisco AnyConnect VPN is its reliability and stability."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The provisioning of VPN users has room for improvement."
"We encounter challenges for the product’s installation and troubleshooting processes compared to other VPN products."
"Bug Fixes and enhancement requests should be remediated earlier."
"It would be good to have Remote Access VPN solutions for Check Point edge services."
"They need to increase their timeout. Right now, it will fail after ten seconds, however, it shouldn't fail until after 20. If you don't get on your phone right away and check on your authentications, it will kick you out."
"We would like to implement HTML5 (clientless access) in the product without installing any additional software."
"This is the best version we are using, however, if some changes can be made in the next release, I'd like to see adjustments to the time period and internet connectivity."
"In an environment with multiple cluster checkpoints, the global properties common to all clusters in some cases give problems."
"There are some issues with connectivity and latency that should be improved."
"Even when your internet speed is good, once you connect to the VPN the speed gets automatically reduced, which is worrisome."
"If they could simplify connections via other machines, like Linux or Mac OS X, it would be helpful."
"The support could be more proactive in their recommendations. I noticed that the Cisco support agents tend to leave customers to do what they need to do in many ways, and you can choose how you want to do it. However, it would be great if they could proactively be involved in best practices and let other customers know how most people are doing it."
"We'd like the product to be cheaper."
"In general, it's always a good idea to improve scalability and stability."
"The solution should not rely on tokens from the mobile application for logins."
"The solution's performance and stability are average."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 57 reviews while Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 67 reviews. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client writes "A stable solution that helps users connect to resources when working from home". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient, Zscaler Private Access and Symantec VIP Access Manager, whereas Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Zscaler Private Access, Fortinet FortiClient and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks. See our Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.