

Check Point Remote Access VPN and Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) compete in the category of secure remote access solutions. Based on user feedback, Cisco appears to have an edge due to better platform integration and support, although both solutions offer strong security features.
Features: Check Point is recognized for its seamless integration with its firewall infrastructure, multi-factor authentication, and SSL VPN capabilities, which eliminate the need for additional hardware. Cisco is highlighted for its strong encryption, reliable multi-factor authentication, and smooth compatibility with Microsoft applications and diverse platforms, including Mac.
Room for Improvement: Check Point users note issues with Linux support, a complex interface, and difficulties in deploying new clients, recommending enhancements in user-friendliness and OS compatibility. Cisco users face challenges with frequent updates, connection drops, high licensing fees, and call for improved system integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point offers straightforward deployment but struggles with configuration scaling. Cisco users find the deployment easy, especially on Windows, and benefit from cloud service integration. Check Point receives mixed reviews for support speed, while Cisco is praised for reliability but could improve response times and clarity.
Pricing and ROI: Both products are considered expensive, with Cisco typically pricier than Check Point. Users value the security features provided. Check Point users find cost justification through integration with their infrastructure. Cisco users see good ROI from comprehensive features, noting licensing costs can be a contention point, yet acknowledging its value in remote connectivity.
It reduces the dependency on being physically present in the office and enhances the overall user experience, saving time and maintaining security.
I have seen a return on investment with fewer employees needed and time saved.
It has reduced the number of support tickets related to remote access by about 30%, saving our IT team significant time.
They are really helpful, and whenever we face any technical or configuration issues, we reach out to them, and they help us resolve the issues as soon as possible.
Contacting the Technical Assistance Centers (TACs) initially can be difficult, but once I get in touch with the TAC team, it is easy to solve problems.
The customer support for Check Point Remote Access VPN has been very helpful and responsive whenever we needed assistance.
Cisco offers very high-quality customer service.
Cisco technical support is difficult, and it requires lots of contracts.
Over the years, there's been a decline in the quality, mainly in areas such as the experience level of support engineers and the time taken to address and escalate issues.
I don't see that we can hit any kind of roof in our organization.
The scalability of Check Point Remote Access VPN is good as it supports a large number of remote users simultaneously.
Our organization finds Check Point Remote Access VPN handles increased numbers of remote users smoothly without performance issues.
A smaller firewall can handle fewer sessions, while a larger one can handle tens of thousands of sessions.
The scalability of Cisco Secure Client depends on the hardware I choose.
Regarding scalability, Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) rates as excellent because we can scale out by simply buying more licenses from the vendor.
Otherwise, the experience and stability are outstanding.
I have not faced any issue, downtime, or latency with Check Point Remote Access VPN.
Check Point Remote Access VPN is very stable.
I would rate the stability ten out of ten.
The stability is really good, and I would rate it up to nine.
Regarding the performance of Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect), I have not seen any issues because performance-wise it functions properly.
The response time is much worse, with the first layer of support lacking sufficient knowledge on how to troubleshoot issues.
Optimizing handshake speed and reducing reconnection delays would improve the user experience, particularly for mobile and hybrid workers.
Deploying these solutions requires higher technical expertise than other solutions.
I am using Intune for deployments, and it's not easy to create an automated deployment where users do not need to register server addresses.
Vendors offer more features, such as a kill switch.
Cisco's security portfolio, including Secure Client and the firewalls, is falling behind.
It is competitively priced, and we have chosen it for its market leadership in the firewall space.
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing are straightforward, though the setup is a bit expensive.
Everything is included in the firewall licensing, so it's free to use as long as you have a firewall.
Palo Alto and Fortinet provide free VPN connections, but Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) requires a license purchase.
I perceive the pricing to be a seven, however, I have perpetual licenses.
The pricing seems to align equally with other competitors like Palo Alto during a competitive situation.
The functionality enables secure access for remotely connecting users, which is necessary for our operations.
Check Point Remote Access VPN has positively impacted my organization by improving productivity and given us a workaround in times of downtime.
Check Point Remote Access VPN has impacted my organization positively by providing better security and ensuring our data is safe within the entity.
Beneficial for businesses needing secure access outside the office.
Additionally, it gives the user flexibility of working from anywhere, which is a major feature we are looking at.
Cisco Secure Client's AnyConnect VPN's reliability has been absolutely wonderful, as well as the ability to connect from any network, regardless of location.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point Remote Access VPN | 3.1% |
| Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) | 5.7% |
| Other | 91.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 51 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 33 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 27 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
Check Point Remote Access VPN enables secure connectivity from remote locations with features like strong encryption and multifactor authentication. Its compatibility with multiple devices ensures operational flexibility for employees and partners accessing corporate resources.
Check Point Remote Access VPN integrates with current firewalls, providing robust security and seamless management. It supports effective remote work with centralized control, allowing users to connect securely from anywhere. While valued for its ease of use and stable performance, it faces limitations in Linux support and requires improved documentation. High-load performance inconsistencies and installation complexities are areas for development. Its adaptability to diverse systems, including cloud integration, offers scalable connectivity solutions.
What are the key features?Organizations in industries like technology and finance implement Check Point Remote Access VPN to maintain secure remote connectivity for employees and partners. By enabling access to internal resources and applications, they support effective remote work and adhere to stringent data security standards, particularly during increased remote working demands or business travel scenarios.
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) delivers reliable, stable connectivity and seamless integration with Active Directory, ensuring secure remote access through a one-click VPN capability. It's lightweight, user-friendly, and supports major operating systems, enhancing remote work flexibility.
Cisco Secure Client, including AnyConnect, is designed for secure remote connectivity, offering multi-factor authentication, advanced malware protection, and automatic error diagnostics. Compatible with Windows, Mac, and Linux, it provides an intuitive setup and a clean interface. While it excels in ease of use, issues such as the outdated Linux build and the need for modern UI enhancements persist. Users also face connectivity challenges with frequent updates and high prices, alongside the need for better endpoint security and system integration. Popular for remote work, it facilitates secure access to corporate networks, allowing seamless interactions with resources like emails, documents, and applications.
What key features does Cisco Secure Client offer?Cisco Secure Client is widely implemented across industries for secure remote connectivity, especially in sectors requiring constant access to servers, data centers, and research labs. It supports remote work by enabling employees in diverse fields to access internal resources efficiently, maintaining productivity and security.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.